By whose definition? We own the governing organizations, we own the infrastructure inside of the U.S. I suppose you could argue that no one can own the Internet, but we certainly control it, and I have yet to be presented with a reason why it shouldn't be that way.
No, read the COTUS. If you change your statement to be : "If The local Government is justified in providing public sanitation service...", then you would be correct. The states and the people are not under the same restrictions as the federal government per the COTUS.
Because public sanitation, police and fire are all handled by the state and local governments. The COTUS talks about the Feds. You might want to actually read the COTUS before making a statement like that.
The right to privacy is not in the Constitution. It is what is known as an penumbral right. It has been guaranteed by the courts even though it is not expressly stated as such. That being said, privacy != anonymity.
Mostly true, but in Micro$oft's case they owe allegiance to their stockholders, which is why it is "imperative to acquire/accrete more capital and expand its markets"
Slashdot Mirror
Er, I don't know about you, but personally, I would find a guild advertised as 'non-caucasian' to be exclusionary, racist and offensive.
Except that a turbo is a type of supercharger....
Supercharging is simply forcing extra air or charge into the combustion chamber.
Extra air requires extra fuel if you want your engine to live.
t was created with US tax money.
Incorrect.
No, correct.
It was created for Americans and Europe to protect themselves from attack.
Incorrect, as it is today.
No, correct.
we paid for it.
Incorrect.
No, correct.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET
So at the end of the day, we own it.
Incorrect.
By whose definition? We own the governing organizations, we own the infrastructure inside of the U.S. I suppose you could argue that no one can own the Internet, but we certainly control it, and I have yet to be presented with a reason why it shouldn't be that way.
Like bio-diesel and alcohol.
Already done.
Ever hear the expression, "fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice, shame on me"?
No, read the COTUS. If you change your statement to be : "If The local Government is justified in providing public sanitation service...", then you would be correct. The states and the people are not under the same restrictions as the federal government per the COTUS.
Because public sanitation, police and fire are all handled by the state and local governments. The COTUS talks about the Feds. You might want to actually read the COTUS before making a statement like that.
What about a space elevator?
The right to privacy is not in the Constitution. It is what is known as an penumbral right. It has been guaranteed by the courts even though it is not expressly stated as such. That being said, privacy != anonymity.
Mostly true, but in Micro$oft's case they owe
allegiance to their stockholders, which is why it
is "imperative to acquire/accrete more
capital and expand its markets"