Yeah.. it's great as long as you don't want to connect to an ad-hoc wireless network. From what I've been able to read on the matter, it seems that _no_ Linux distro can currently do this:s
I would expect that the resources that would be required (for the equipment and the expertise) to make a serious attempt at this are out of reach for most. I'm sure the likes of organizations such as the NSA have already attempted this, but as to whether or not they had any success..well I'm sure that information is classified.
Crazy1Jim Wrote: > Or even better, don't tell them that they're banned. > Just let them keep posting, but they're the only ones > who sees their posts.
That sounds like a good idea, but just make sure that you block or re-route their ip-address/range to the blackholed version of your site. Alternatively, if you wanted, you could direct their ip-range to a page that says 'Blocked. Reason: Loser' (or whatever message you wanted). You could have it block their ip-range for some hours or days, and then fall back to blocking only their ip-address for another period of time). A system like this seems to me as though it would thwart the vast majority of trolls by quickley becoming a time pit in terms of just figuring out WTF is going on.
If you wanted to invest even more time you could also implement checks on http cookies to try and identify the duplicate clients through perhaps even more advanced means.
Naturally, the level will escalate to rediculous levels and go on and on. However, it would allow for extensive control by the administration.
For the rest of us who aren't botnet savvy and already familiar with 'Storm', here is a a link to get started: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_Worm. WTFBBQ, YMMV.
No, the parent is right on the money mate. Calling you a tool isn't an insult, it's just stating the facts. You really are a pathetic little shit of a tool.
I wouldn't be surprised if you're related to Rick Santorum.
A web application should be cleaning up after each transaction to arrive at a safe state; why wouldn't a web server do the same? If it doesn't, it should.
Ya, and people should always wear their seatbelts, never drink and drive, and floss everytime they brush their teeth; Yet, the majority of humans fail to abide by these 3 simple "should haves".
Maybe you should write a howto covering how you think a web server should behave, and then proceed to write your own implementation from scratch (for my network programming class I had to do this, in C++ with my own sockets library).
Oh, and nevermind the fact that the web server may not have any state information.
I'm sure you're just another troll or BOFH wannabe anyways.
Slashdot Mirror
+5 Insightful. Where are the mod points when I actually want to use them?
Anyways, thanks for clearing that up!
WICD works wonderfully for me, with zero issues...?
http://wicd.sourceforge.net/
Yeah.. it's great as long as you don't want to connect to an ad-hoc wireless network. From what I've been able to read on the matter, it seems that _no_ Linux distro can currently do this :s
they're going to be telling us that Fortran is the new Java.
I would expect that the resources that would be required (for the equipment and the expertise) to make a serious attempt at this are out of reach for most. I'm sure the likes of organizations such as the NSA have already attempted this, but as to whether or not they had any success..well I'm sure that information is classified.
--
WI-FIzzle Blaahhggg.. I just post useful code snippets and linux information here
Thanks!
That sounds like a good idea, but just make sure that you block or re-route their ip-address/range to the blackholed version of your site. Alternatively, if you wanted, you could direct their ip-range to a page that says 'Blocked. Reason: Loser' (or whatever message you wanted). You could have it block their ip-range for some hours or days, and then fall back to blocking only their ip-address for another period of time). A system like this seems to me as though it would thwart the vast majority of trolls by quickley becoming a time pit in terms of just figuring out WTF is going on.
If you wanted to invest even more time you could also implement checks on http cookies to try and identify the duplicate clients through perhaps even more advanced means.
Naturally, the level will escalate to rediculous levels and go on and on. However, it would allow for extensive control by the administration.
Pretty control-freakish though, too.
Well..is it?
--
Wi-Fizzle Blaahgish heap..
Is that per person? That's a lot..
Why can't they just use animal urine or synthetic urine?
-- :/
Wi-Fizzle Research..yeah it's a lame domain name
Do you know where one can would be able to find more information on LastV/LastXP/LastVista? It sounds like it could be really cool.
Thanks!
Wi-Fizzle.com; I guess it's really just a blaaaaaaaaahg..
How about getting some nice prints of some of the stuff from ACiD? I love that old-school ascii art...
Or you could print Natalie Portman and hot grits on a dot matrix printer...or goatse.. It's up to you..
You are severely oversimplifying their solution.
For the rest of us who aren't botnet savvy and already familiar with 'Storm', here is a a link to get started: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_Worm. WTFBBQ, YMMV.
-
I <3 Cisco Clean Access
Why isn't anyone mentioning the ext JavaScript library? jQuery is so last year!
-- For Shizzle
You sound awfully paranoid. You really think anyone is out to get YOU this very instant? You should get that checked out...
No, the parent is right on the money mate. Calling you a tool isn't an insult, it's just stating the facts. You really are a pathetic little shit of a tool.
I wouldn't be surprised if you're related to Rick Santorum.
You can't bike 4 miles before smelling like a pig? What has the world come to....
Thanks much, Mr. Waddams.
That just made my day. Thanks!
but can it do 2 gzips at the same time!?
Solid; Sure. Harden; No. To me it reads as if it were something composed by an individual who was having difficulty expressing their ideas..
Precisely!
--
Wi-Fizzle Fo' Shizzle Dizzle
How exactly would one 'harden' ones understanding? Sounds wacky.. or tacky ..
--
Wi-Fizzle Fo' Shizzle Dizzle
Ya, and people should always wear their seatbelts, never drink and drive, and floss everytime they brush their teeth; Yet, the majority of humans fail to abide by these 3 simple "should haves".
Maybe you should write a howto covering how you think a web server should behave, and then proceed to write your own implementation from scratch (for my network programming class I had to do this, in C++ with my own sockets library).
Oh, and nevermind the fact that the web server may not have any state information.
I'm sure you're just another troll or BOFH wannabe anyways.
c'ya and good luck, buck.
--
wi-fizzle research, straight outta oakland
Part 2 is mirrored as well:
t -2.html
http://mirror.wi-fizzle.com/copyright-is-dead-par
--
wi-fizzle research and development
In case the site is removed/taken offline again, here is a mirror of the article which will be up for the foreseeable future:l
http://mirror.wi-fizzle.com/copyright-is-dead.htm
--
wi-fizzle research and development
I tagged this one with 'borg'.
Damn the man.