You can indeed have both, and if you can't see that I suppose your collage proffesors are to blame.
The wealth is being redistributed through governments and big company's, from the middle class folks to the poor. Globaly.
Which means the really wealthy will take their cut on the way down.
Or is this concept too tricky for you?
I had to re-itterate in a more to the point fashion, that the current state of finance in the world has a little over 1% of the worlds population (United States + European Union) controlling almost 50% of the worlds total GDP.
China knows it has an economic growth comming, and it's a long time in comming, isn't it?
Anyway, with this growth they are susspicious. They don't feel the more wealthy countries will be so remiss as to allow their riches to just funell away. So China may be slowley stepping up it's intelligence gathering opperations to this effect.
China is a big bad machine. If we give them an inch they will take $3,000 miles without a heartbeats pause.
The total population of the planet Earth is 6,446,131,400 as of July 2005.
1,306,313,812 of which belongs to China, and 1,080,264,388 to India with the Europian Union running a long third at 456,953,258 and the United States running an even longer fourth at 295,734,134.
The total available monetary assests of the planet Earth is $55,500,000,000,000 US. 11,750,000,000,000 of which belongs to the United States with the European Union running a close second at $11,650,000,000,000 and China running a long third with $7,262,000,000,000. India ranks in at fith with a modest GDP of $3,319,000,000,000. The United States ranks 157th on the birth rate chart with 14.4. China comes in at 164th with 13.14.
What does all this mean? It means that most of the wealth of this world is owned by the United States and European Union. That's GDP people. Solid wealth PRODUCTION. China dose'nt even hold a candle.
With the world opening into a global free market, this MUST change. What we are seeing is the begining of a global wealth re-distribution. Unfortunatly for us here in the U.S. that means those that have will loose, and those that don't have will gain.
It will be a crash for us, and a major boon for the Earth as a whole. After it all balances out in a couple of hundred years.
It is unfortunate, but I don't see the rich people of the world loosing any of their money in this redistributino of wealth. In fact, I see the rich getting massivley richer, the poor getting a little bit richer, and the middle of the road disapearing almost entirley. In a couple of century's mind you.
Windows Media Player 10 series is available for free download to all Windows users. MSN Messenger 7.5 is available for free download to all Windows users.
Hmm, lets see, I can pay for Korean company A's crappy beta media player, or download a polished late version one for free?
The point of this entire endevour, then? 32 million free dollars.
If we can capture the C02, then lets liquify it, round it up with all of the trash in the landfills, all of the nuclear waste, and all of our other refuse, and launch it into space with a nuke set to go off in 100 years?
Getting into orbit is cheap enough now, and ion based engine systems would provide economical acceleration for the demolition craft.
Furthermore, the money we would save be eliminating current waste, refuse, and environmental protection systems would more than pay for it.
The best solution is the most simplistic, but the most dangerous, complicated, and proffitable solution is always selected.
For real, go search "Linux" at microsoft. All you get is ways to abandon linux for MS products. For that matter, every result msn search gives you for just about everything directs you to Microsoft, or MS partner companies.
This is a terrible attempt to control the disimination of information, and the very thought of people concerning MS, the internet, and these shrubbs will fail.
What idiots.
Slashdot Mirror
You can indeed have both, and if you can't see that I suppose your collage proffesors are to blame. The wealth is being redistributed through governments and big company's, from the middle class folks to the poor. Globaly. Which means the really wealthy will take their cut on the way down. Or is this concept too tricky for you?
Honestly, Japan barley registers on the radar. All of this information couresy of the C.I.A. refferanced against Forbes and WPO for integrity.
I have no idea what all of these misconseptions are about with the U.S. supposedly being poor and in so much debt.
I had to re-itterate in a more to the point fashion, that the current state of finance in the world has a little over 1% of the worlds population (United States + European Union) controlling almost 50% of the worlds total GDP.
We have nothing to worry about in our lifetimes.
China knows it has an economic growth comming, and it's a long time in comming, isn't it?
Anyway, with this growth they are susspicious. They don't feel the more wealthy countries will be so remiss as to allow their riches to just funell away. So China may be slowley stepping up it's intelligence gathering opperations to this effect.
China is a big bad machine. If we give them an inch they will take $3,000 miles without a heartbeats pause.
When in Rome....
The total population of the planet Earth is 6,446,131,400 as of July 2005. 1,306,313,812 of which belongs to China, and 1,080,264,388 to India with the Europian Union running a long third at 456,953,258 and the United States running an even longer fourth at 295,734,134. The total available monetary assests of the planet Earth is $55,500,000,000,000 US. 11,750,000,000,000 of which belongs to the United States with the European Union running a close second at $11,650,000,000,000 and China running a long third with $7,262,000,000,000. India ranks in at fith with a modest GDP of $3,319,000,000,000. The United States ranks 157th on the birth rate chart with 14.4. China comes in at 164th with 13.14. What does all this mean? It means that most of the wealth of this world is owned by the United States and European Union. That's GDP people. Solid wealth PRODUCTION. China dose'nt even hold a candle. With the world opening into a global free market, this MUST change. What we are seeing is the begining of a global wealth re-distribution. Unfortunatly for us here in the U.S. that means those that have will loose, and those that don't have will gain. It will be a crash for us, and a major boon for the Earth as a whole. After it all balances out in a couple of hundred years. It is unfortunate, but I don't see the rich people of the world loosing any of their money in this redistributino of wealth. In fact, I see the rich getting massivley richer, the poor getting a little bit richer, and the middle of the road disapearing almost entirley. In a couple of century's mind you.
Windows Media Player 10 series is available for free download to all Windows users. MSN Messenger 7.5 is available for free download to all Windows users. Hmm, lets see, I can pay for Korean company A's crappy beta media player, or download a polished late version one for free? The point of this entire endevour, then? 32 million free dollars.
If we can capture the C02, then lets liquify it, round it up with all of the trash in the landfills, all of the nuclear waste, and all of our other refuse, and launch it into space with a nuke set to go off in 100 years? Getting into orbit is cheap enough now, and ion based engine systems would provide economical acceleration for the demolition craft. Furthermore, the money we would save be eliminating current waste, refuse, and environmental protection systems would more than pay for it. The best solution is the most simplistic, but the most dangerous, complicated, and proffitable solution is always selected.
For real, go search "Linux" at microsoft. All you get is ways to abandon linux for MS products. For that matter, every result msn search gives you for just about everything directs you to Microsoft, or MS partner companies. This is a terrible attempt to control the disimination of information, and the very thought of people concerning MS, the internet, and these shrubbs will fail. What idiots.