the beer commercial shows you that when you open up one of their beers you get 20 naked women to show up at your party, but the "other" beer brings balding middle aged men.
Honestly, which party would be better for you, the host? Buying a few 24 packs of coors light for you and your sports friends or stocking up on 4/$9 wine coolers for the ladies? Think about it
I wonder, will there be a point in time when we hold accountable either the credit agencies for their broken system or organizations we are forced to trust with our data for not keeping it safe?
Sure. But it's up to you. Here's a handy guide for redressing your grievances: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storming_of_the_Basti lle
Problem: Any such changes would only affect those convicted (or possibly charged, not too sure on that) after the new statute came into effect. You can't just say that someone already in jail now has to serve 10 more years because the punishment changed, that's an ex post facto violation.
Of course, you can always just do what New York Governor Pataki did and commit sex offenders to mental hopsitals indefinitely when they've served their time:
Unfortunately, our country is founded on the idea that government must demonstrate why we should give up a right, rather then why we need to have it.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the States respectively, or to the people.
Does any one else think its not the purpose of the government to say what we can and cannot know, use and look at?
Yeah, these guys:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the States respectively, or to the people
Nowhere in Article One does congress have anything which gives them the authority to censor material.
The same benefit any big company finds with technology
Step 1: Higher up finds he's got all this money, but it's tied up in the company and he wants to sneak it out into my own pocket.
Step 2: Contract out with a friend for a zany new technological upgrade that does nothing for the business or it's customers. Overspend like it's going out of style.
When was the last time you hear of a police officer disciplined for gross misuse of tear gas, rubber bullets, or clubs? That (non-rioting bystander) girl killed by a beanbag round in Boston -- they didn't even press charges, much less convict.
Slashdot Mirror
Marketroids are duplicitous, unscuplulous, charlatans
Not to mention you're fucked without the ice beam.
the beer commercial shows you that when you open up one of their beers you get 20 naked women to show up at your party, but the "other" beer brings balding middle aged men.
Honestly, which party would be better for you, the host? Buying a few 24 packs of coors light for you and your sports friends or stocking up on 4/$9 wine coolers for the ladies? Think about it
Now they are going to have to outsource all of our Porn to India.......
Mmm, yeah. If it comes to that... look, you can keep it. No, really. We'll be fine. There will be another way. Trust me, we're good.
Stone cold fuck nuts.
Lew saw this coming.
Segways by terrorists
So that's how the only 7-foot Saudi lugging around a dialysis machine is still able to elude our armed forces.
You'd have to love the simplicity in those queries, though. And they're so adaptable to future Enemies of the Empire.
if (user()->query_age() if (user()->query_race() == "brown") return phone_dhs();
if (juden) ausrotten();
I wonder, will there be a point in time when we hold accountable either the credit agencies for their broken system or organizations we are forced to trust with our data for not keeping it safe? Sure. But it's up to you. Here's a handy guide for redressing your grievances: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storming_of_the_Basti lle
Government only has the power to make sure it protects your civil rights. They have no authority to dictate the same between private citizens.
Problem: Any such changes would only affect those convicted (or possibly charged, not too sure on that) after the new statute came into effect. You can't just say that someone already in jail now has to serve 10 more years because the punishment changed, that's an ex post facto violation.
i ne.html?ex=1321851600&en=d259e46fb50f2954&ei=5088& partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Of course, you can always just do what New York Governor Pataki did and commit sex offenders to mental hopsitals indefinitely when they've served their time:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/22/nyregion/22conf
Um, yeah. Wrong one. Oops.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Unfortunately, our country is founded on the idea that government must demonstrate why we should give up a right, rather then why we need to have it.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the States respectively, or to the people.
Wait, so in this carefully-constructed example of yours, what the guy actually do wrong?
You're back to square one. What group decides what is obscene and belongs in .xxx? What is hate speech and belongs in .kkk?
I don't think you understand this whole "world wide web" thing all that well.
Ha, nice try, I read that one on alt.sex.stories already!
Does any one else think its not the purpose of the government to say what we can and cannot know, use and look at?
Yeah, these guys:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the States respectively, or to the people
Nowhere in Article One does congress have anything which gives them the authority to censor material.
It must be a lawful order. They can't just command you to leave the area if you're not doing anything wrong and then beat you for noncompliance.
Well, they can, really, since nothing has stopped them yet. But nowhere is that power granted.
The same benefit any big company finds with technology
Step 1: Higher up finds he's got all this money, but it's tied up in the company and he wants to sneak it out into my own pocket.
Step 2: Contract out with a friend for a zany new technological upgrade that does nothing for the business or it's customers. Overspend like it's going out of style.
Step 3: Split profit
I thought moving more than X dollars between accounts automagically flagged you as a terrorist? Pretty sweet deal for the bank:
Me: I've had enough of this shit, I quit
Bank: If you do, we'll have the government sieze all your money
Me: Hey, let's negotiate!
Actually, that's exactly what it means.
If you try to redress your grievances in any peaceful way and are told "no", then your right to do it is being infringed.
Please point out where in the police manual it states that refusing to obey an officer's orders allows for force to be used.
How often do sports riots result in deaths before the police come on the scene? The cure is worse than the disease.
The only two I can think of where someone (1 person in each) died were the crown heights and la race riots.
a legal-age man can purchase alcohol with his wife who is under the drinking age limit
However, this coming to light will pretty much ensure him a lifetime registration as a sex offender.
When was the last time you hear of a police officer disciplined for gross misuse of tear gas, rubber bullets, or clubs? That (non-rioting bystander) girl killed by a beanbag round in Boston -- they didn't even press charges, much less convict.
Right, the "it's a nonlethal alternative" arguement only works when the alternative is being used only when a lethal one would be otherwise.