Bosons, baryons, fermions. If Mills has hard evidence of non-quantum particle behaviour it's gonna take a lot of gluon to keep the big money, big science, "high-energy" physics roadshow together. Squeals out of that sector of gubmint teat-suckers would be priceless, not to mention the "hot fusion in a decade" crowd. The bigger the lie the beggars the belief or something.
Fudge, kludge and smudge.
Isn't a hydrino just like a neutron in an excited state?
Collapsing the electron all the way into the proton yields a neutron or does the neutron decay not work backwards, give or take an antineutrino or energy between friends?
Actually, the Mills theory is quite clear that achieving lower hydrogen energy states is not by emission of photons but by using a catalytic transfer, as is common in many chemical reactions. The core of his argument is that the electron energy levels are non-radiative states, as defined by a Maxwell equation boundary condition. Ground state and above are able to radiate/absorb via phtons as per Planck's laws, thus the dogmatic doctrine of quantum mechanics was formed. Non-radiative energy transfers (via good old particle collision) are old hat and left behind by the physicists for the chemists around 1915, but they do still happen and obey well-defined, indeed intuitive even, laws.
Mills claims to access lower energy electron levels of hydrogen by collison interaction with ions of other elements that have correctly sized energy holes. Such lowered electron level hydrogens, if they were to occur in nature, would be lighter than hydrogen and rarer even than hydrogen at sea level. If they do exist, they will probably have some pretty funky chemistry since the electron about determines that for most elements. And who knows about toxicity, plutonium doesn't occur naturally but is the product of fission heat release of uranium, and is notoriously stable.
Plutonium was created by nuclear processes that released heat but is not found in nature before then. Stable as anything too. Hydrinos if real, could be considered an electronic conversion of matter into energy, rather than nuclear like fission and fusion, I suppose.
Slashdot Mirror
Bosons, baryons, fermions. If Mills has hard evidence of non-quantum particle behaviour it's gonna take a lot of gluon to keep the big money, big science, "high-energy" physics roadshow together. Squeals out of that sector of gubmint teat-suckers would be priceless, not to mention the "hot fusion in a decade" crowd. The bigger the lie the beggars the belief or something. Fudge, kludge and smudge.
Isn't a hydrino just like a neutron in an excited state? Collapsing the electron all the way into the proton yields a neutron or does the neutron decay not work backwards, give or take an antineutrino or energy between friends?
Actually, the Mills theory is quite clear that achieving lower hydrogen energy states is not by emission of photons but by using a catalytic transfer, as is common in many chemical reactions. The core of his argument is that the electron energy levels are non-radiative states, as defined by a Maxwell equation boundary condition. Ground state and above are able to radiate/absorb via phtons as per Planck's laws, thus the dogmatic doctrine of quantum mechanics was formed. Non-radiative energy transfers (via good old particle collision) are old hat and left behind by the physicists for the chemists around 1915, but they do still happen and obey well-defined, indeed intuitive even, laws.
Mills claims to access lower energy electron levels of hydrogen by collison interaction with ions of other elements that have correctly sized energy holes. Such lowered electron level hydrogens, if they were to occur in nature, would be lighter than hydrogen and rarer even than hydrogen at sea level. If they do exist, they will probably have some pretty funky chemistry since the electron about determines that for most elements. And who knows about toxicity, plutonium doesn't occur naturally but is the product of fission heat release of uranium, and is notoriously stable.
Plutonium was created by nuclear processes that released heat but is not found in nature before then. Stable as anything too. Hydrinos if real, could be considered an electronic conversion of matter into energy, rather than nuclear like fission and fusion, I suppose.