that is not the posit of the previous poster. matter itself does not consciously decide to undergo process, as you've stated as being the alternate view, nor does it require a conscious creator to kick of the event in your view. primordial matter or energies, under sufficient conditions will undergo change as described by the laws that describe those entities. it's that simple. it's a fallacy to state that because we do not yet understand these laws that we never will, or that a because we don't yet understand them, we require conscious being to catalyze the event.
Slashdot Mirror
that is not the posit of the previous poster. matter itself does not consciously decide to undergo process, as you've stated as being the alternate view, nor does it require a conscious creator to kick of the event in your view. primordial matter or energies, under sufficient conditions will undergo change as described by the laws that describe those entities. it's that simple. it's a fallacy to state that because we do not yet understand these laws that we never will, or that a because we don't yet understand them, we require conscious being to catalyze the event.