Reading between the lines..
if I'm deciphering the patent correctly..
The closest to it I can think of would be the interference of High Frequency Gravitational waves.
Now - theoretically - you can get these by use of High Frequency Superconductors. but it has nothing to do with the fact they are superconductors: It's due to the fact that the material that they calculate has the right quantum states to only be able to produce what should be high frequrncy gravitational waves under the correct conditions.
Please note the continual use of words like 'calculate' 'should' 'theoretical'. Last paper I saw on the subject was from a forum talking about best designs for a generator, so they could ask for funding to see if it worked.
anyway. According to general relativity, you have two HFGW fields intersect at the right angle, they will create a singularity at point of intersection. a small one. mostly temporary, as long as the field is up.. well. think about it, for a minute. See if you can work out why 'mostly'.
anyway. THe general idea for propulsion is: I put 2 HFGW emmitters on the front of my spaceship. it generaets a singularity in frnot of it, and is pulled towards the singularity.. but as the emitters are moving forward, the singularity moves forward as well, so it never actually gets any closer. Please note you are/not/ generating energy from nothing, you are converting electrical energy into gravitational energy into kinetic energy.
Now. To the point of all this rample.
You may recall, a while back, a lab claiming they had noticed gravitational distortions with spinning superconducting magnets.
It just so happens that their superconducting magnet was made of the specific material in question. Spinning has nothing to do with it: they rekon it's curvature. (for focusing the beam.) So.. it ireads like this guy has read the earlier labs paper, and added in some crackpot ideas about how to get his hands on zero point energy.
personally? I'm not holding my breath, and waiting to see the results form the HFGW trials. in a decade or so..
Slashdot Mirror
Reading between the lines.. if I'm deciphering the patent correctly.. The closest to it I can think of would be the interference of High Frequency Gravitational waves. Now - theoretically - you can get these by use of High Frequency Superconductors. but it has nothing to do with the fact they are superconductors: It's due to the fact that the material that they calculate has the right quantum states to only be able to produce what should be high frequrncy gravitational waves under the correct conditions. Please note the continual use of words like 'calculate' 'should' 'theoretical'. Last paper I saw on the subject was from a forum talking about best designs for a generator, so they could ask for funding to see if it worked. anyway. According to general relativity, you have two HFGW fields intersect at the right angle, they will create a singularity at point of intersection. a small one. mostly temporary, as long as the field is up.. well. think about it, for a minute. See if you can work out why 'mostly'. anyway. THe general idea for propulsion is: I put 2 HFGW emmitters on the front of my spaceship. it generaets a singularity in frnot of it, and is pulled towards the singularity.. but as the emitters are moving forward, the singularity moves forward as well, so it never actually gets any closer. Please note you are /not/ generating energy from nothing, you are converting electrical energy into gravitational energy into kinetic energy.
Now. To the point of all this rample.
You may recall, a while back, a lab claiming they had noticed gravitational distortions with spinning superconducting magnets.
It just so happens that their superconducting magnet was made of the specific material in question. Spinning has nothing to do with it: they rekon it's curvature. (for focusing the beam.) So.. it ireads like this guy has read the earlier labs paper, and added in some crackpot ideas about how to get his hands on zero point energy.
personally? I'm not holding my breath, and waiting to see the results form the HFGW trials. in a decade or so..