I agree that currently, objectively even if it's uncomfortable to have the government read and log all my electronic communications I'm not *currently* hugely worried about it. I'm much more worried about thieves, etc.
The problem is what's going to happen moving forward? The logical end game, is total surveillance of everything electronic/physical ( with cam, image recognition ) where the police comes knocking on your door because your phone GPS logs and CCTV show that 2 months ago you were in a house that's just been busted for being a drug dealer den. It's all automatic, they just had to tell the datamining tools to flag every single person that came in and out of that house since the drug dealer moved in 4 years ago.
I would like to say it's alarmist and stuff but for example where I live in Canada, Cop cars now have automated license plate scanners. It's all tied to your police file, DMV, ticket, etc. If *anything* is out of order like unpaid plates, broken tail light 2 days ago that you needed to repair, etc it's going to popup a warning that they should check you. I was pulled over ( rightly so ) because I was 2 days late on my driver license, the cop car just happened to be parked on the side of the street and when I drove by it signaled that a car ( with picture ) just drove by with an owner that hadn't renewed his driver license on time. The next step of this, is already in the works,it's going to be total surveillance of all car plates all the time. It's nothing ground breaking but I know where I live it's being worked on, we have a shitload of camera everywhere to monitor traffic, it's just a natural extension of that. They'll just signal in somewhat real time the position of a car the cops want tracker and I imagine at some point they'll extend it to unpaid license plates and stuff. Obviously that system works mostly in urban areas. I can't find the news article about it, but I read about it almost a year ago IIRC.
It's a bit flawed as an analogy because the soldiers things probably won't happen to you. On the other hand, current surveillance is automated and they automatically break down all the doors to take a peak, just in case.
That's a very US centric view. We as Canadians have a different approach to government and how we want to build our society. We're more like european countries with Free School for all, Free Healthcare for all, lots of social services and support for our vulnerable population. The term "free enterprise" is not something I think I've heard *once* in my life from a politician here. We frankly don't make a big deal about the "sacred invisible hand of the market".
An aspect of this, is the government spending a LOT of money developing artists, book/movie production houses, etc. This conflict between Netflix and the CRTC is tied to that. Other broadcaster have to chip money into the pot for, yes, our socialist approach to fostering local arts. Many Canadians *support* this idea and we're not too fond of an American company trying to wreck the system of local content production.
Except that we're the second largest market for Netflix, that would be a lot of revenue streams evaporating overnight, they're not going to give that up. Frankly, Netflix Canada is so empty of recent content ( and even old one ) that it wouldn't be much of a loss.
I don't know the FCC but this case is exactly what the CRTC is supposed to be regulating. Netflix wants to get away without chipping into the pot for canadian content production ( that others have to pay ).
That's a very US centric view. We as Canadians have a different approach to government and how we want to build our society. We're more like european countries with Free School for all, Free Healthcare for all, lots of social services and support for our vulnerable population.
An aspect of this, is the government spending a LOT of money developing artists, book/movie production houses, etc. This conflict between Netflix and the CRTC is tied to that. Other broadcaster have to chip money into the pot for, yes, our socialist approach to fostering local arts. Many Canadians *support* this idea and we're not too fond of an American company trying to wreck the system of local content production.
The world isn't the united states:P
Some countries or regions run a much cleaner energy generation program that don't rely so heavily on coal.
Re:Is communism bad in theory or only in practice?
on
Google's China Problem
·
· Score: 1
One could argue that people will only take up jobs that they *like* instead of doing a job they usually hate for good money. I made the choice to exchange higher wage for a job that I love doing a long time ago.
No, both versions are watermarked but the watermarked is in a different place on each version. You simply check for the differences between the two files and correct it.
Maybe it's a local family or regional thing but TV while being something we do watch isn't as important as described in your post. A lot of the discussions in my family or with my friends is mostly centered around politics, science and ethics/philosophy of some kind. In short, we like to talk about remaking the world I guess ^_^.
For once, we don't need to use the ?????? in our profit plans :
1. Have news website write how great the portal hosting it is.
2. Get the news posted on slashdot and other news site.
3. Increase page views and make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
4. Profit!
Slashdot Mirror
I agree that currently, objectively even if it's uncomfortable to have the government read and log all my electronic communications I'm not *currently* hugely worried about it. I'm much more worried about thieves, etc.
The problem is what's going to happen moving forward? The logical end game, is total surveillance of everything electronic/physical ( with cam, image recognition ) where the police comes knocking on your door because your phone GPS logs and CCTV show that 2 months ago you were in a house that's just been busted for being a drug dealer den. It's all automatic, they just had to tell the datamining tools to flag every single person that came in and out of that house since the drug dealer moved in 4 years ago.
I would like to say it's alarmist and stuff but for example where I live in Canada, Cop cars now have automated license plate scanners. It's all tied to your police file, DMV, ticket, etc. If *anything* is out of order like unpaid plates, broken tail light 2 days ago that you needed to repair, etc it's going to popup a warning that they should check you. I was pulled over ( rightly so ) because I was 2 days late on my driver license, the cop car just happened to be parked on the side of the street and when I drove by it signaled that a car ( with picture ) just drove by with an owner that hadn't renewed his driver license on time. The next step of this, is already in the works,it's going to be total surveillance of all car plates all the time. It's nothing ground breaking but I know where I live it's being worked on, we have a shitload of camera everywhere to monitor traffic, it's just a natural extension of that. They'll just signal in somewhat real time the position of a car the cops want tracker and I imagine at some point they'll extend it to unpaid license plates and stuff. Obviously that system works mostly in urban areas. I can't find the news article about it, but I read about it almost a year ago IIRC.
It's a bit flawed as an analogy because the soldiers things probably won't happen to you. On the other hand, current surveillance is automated and they automatically break down all the doors to take a peak, just in case.
That's a very US centric view. We as Canadians have a different approach to government and how we want to build our society. We're more like european countries with Free School for all, Free Healthcare for all, lots of social services and support for our vulnerable population. The term "free enterprise" is not something I think I've heard *once* in my life from a politician here. We frankly don't make a big deal about the "sacred invisible hand of the market".
An aspect of this, is the government spending a LOT of money developing artists, book/movie production houses, etc. This conflict between Netflix and the CRTC is tied to that. Other broadcaster have to chip money into the pot for, yes, our socialist approach to fostering local arts. Many Canadians *support* this idea and we're not too fond of an American company trying to wreck the system of local content production.
Except that we're the second largest market for Netflix, that would be a lot of revenue streams evaporating overnight, they're not going to give that up. Frankly, Netflix Canada is so empty of recent content ( and even old one ) that it wouldn't be much of a loss.
I don't know the FCC but this case is exactly what the CRTC is supposed to be regulating. Netflix wants to get away without chipping into the pot for canadian content production ( that others have to pay ).
That's a very US centric view. We as Canadians have a different approach to government and how we want to build our society. We're more like european countries with Free School for all, Free Healthcare for all, lots of social services and support for our vulnerable population.
An aspect of this, is the government spending a LOT of money developing artists, book/movie production houses, etc. This conflict between Netflix and the CRTC is tied to that. Other broadcaster have to chip money into the pot for, yes, our socialist approach to fostering local arts. Many Canadians *support* this idea and we're not too fond of an American company trying to wreck the system of local content production.
As a Canadian, fuck American corporations who think they can just ignore our laws and sovereignty.
The world isn't the united states :P
Some countries or regions run a much cleaner energy generation program that don't rely so heavily on coal.
One could argue that people will only take up jobs that they *like* instead of doing a job they usually hate for good money. I made the choice to exchange higher wage for a job that I love doing a long time ago.
Woz isn't squeeky clean either, with the whole blue box deal etc.
No, you definitly are not an expert.
Lol, obviously you've never been to a teather that shows porn.
Sorry to be a stickler here but it can't be inhuman treatment because they're not human, they're mices.
No, both versions are watermarked but the watermarked is in a different place on each version. You simply check for the differences between the two files and correct it.
Maybe it's a local family or regional thing but TV while being something we do watch isn't as important as described in your post. A lot of the discussions in my family or with my friends is mostly centered around politics, science and ethics/philosophy of some kind. In short, we like to talk about remaking the world I guess ^_^.
For once, we don't need to use the ?????? in our profit plans :
1. Have news website write how great the portal hosting it is.
2. Get the news posted on slashdot and other news site.
3. Increase page views and make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
4. Profit!