I fully agree, see my comments earlier: wikipedia will evolve faster and faster despite quality issues. But it requires a reasonable and critical approach to its content. The Weblinks are a useful "second opinion" and better than the search results of google and Co. today. In addition intelligent search interfaces such as http://wiki.lumrix.net/en [lumrix.net] provide cross checking (validation) of certain topics in different languages. Precondition: Little foreign language competence!
... will evolve faster and faster despite quality issues. But it requires a reasonable and critical approach to its content. The Weblinks are a useful "second opinion" and better than the search results of google and Co. today.
In adition intelligent search interfaces such as http://wiki.lumrix.net/en provide cross checking (validation) of certain topics in different languages.
Precondition: Little foreign language competence!
Slashdot Mirror
I fully agree, see my comments earlier:
wikipedia will evolve faster and faster despite quality issues. But it requires a reasonable and critical approach to its content. The Weblinks are a useful "second opinion" and better than the search results of google and Co. today. In addition intelligent search interfaces such as http://wiki.lumrix.net/en [lumrix.net] provide cross checking (validation) of certain topics in different languages. Precondition: Little foreign language competence!
... will evolve faster and faster despite quality issues. But it requires a reasonable and critical approach to its content. The Weblinks are a useful "second opinion" and better than the search results of google and Co. today. In adition intelligent search interfaces such as http://wiki.lumrix.net/en provide cross checking (validation) of certain topics in different languages. Precondition: Little foreign language competence!