TBSDY are saying for the record of wiki or a personal record?
What's your evidence to show this slashdot is from WeHateTech.com's Josh or Glen?
A user of WeHateTech.com has created this thread. But not WeHateTech.com. There's a signicant difference and should be recognized by all parties.
There has been multiple listings of WeHateTech.com in Wikipedia. By Wiki records, some of been made in the "talk" others in "podcast" and one with a french name, and another as "we hate tech" and "wehatetech".
What was the impact to Wikipedia from these multiple entries?
If you are from Wikipedia, please explain why editors refer to WeHateTech.com users as "sock puppets" and why editors use descriptions like "resistance is futal"? If you aren't from Wiki then... I'd like to here from Wiki these editor comments.
The auditing process of wikipedia editors and admins is in question. Editors have the ability to remove other editors comments or pages without counsel. Also, wikipedia has two editorial camps.
The first camp is more communicative and adheres to the policies of wikipedia.
The second camp is referred to as "janitors" due to the "cleanup" of pages and supression of vandil attacks.
It's the second camp or janitors that are in question. There have been incidents of page alterantion without comments. This disregard for process his the center of many problems within wikipedia.
Slashdot Mirror
Encylclopedia Dramatica provides a saracastic point of view but, there's some truth mixed in. (excuse the profane link) http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Bur eaucratic_Fuck/
TBSDY are saying for the record of wiki or a personal record? What's your evidence to show this slashdot is from WeHateTech.com's Josh or Glen? A user of WeHateTech.com has created this thread. But not WeHateTech.com. There's a signicant difference and should be recognized by all parties. There has been multiple listings of WeHateTech.com in Wikipedia. By Wiki records, some of been made in the "talk" others in "podcast" and one with a french name, and another as "we hate tech" and "wehatetech". What was the impact to Wikipedia from these multiple entries? If you are from Wikipedia, please explain why editors refer to WeHateTech.com users as "sock puppets" and why editors use descriptions like "resistance is futal"? If you aren't from Wiki then ... I'd like to here from Wiki these editor comments.
The auditing process of wikipedia editors and admins is in question. Editors have the ability to remove other editors comments or pages without counsel. Also, wikipedia has two editorial camps. The first camp is more communicative and adheres to the policies of wikipedia. The second camp is referred to as "janitors" due to the "cleanup" of pages and supression of vandil attacks. It's the second camp or janitors that are in question. There have been incidents of page alterantion without comments. This disregard for process his the center of many problems within wikipedia.