Give me a test that can be done to show that the requirements of falsifiability in science can be falsified.
You can't.
Therefore, the current view of science is self-contradictory.
Karl Popper and the so-called scientific establishment are working within a framework of absurdity.
It is impossible for a tube to be filled with "radiation".
Radiation would be emitted spherically in all directions from the tube, subject to the inverse square law. That is, unless one was far enough away from the tube for it to be considered a point source.
What the tube was filled with is "contamination", which is the source of the radiation.
Contamination is the "sh*t"...radiation is the "stink".
Slashdot Mirror
Give me a test that can be done to show that the requirements of falsifiability in science can be falsified. You can't. Therefore, the current view of science is self-contradictory. Karl Popper and the so-called scientific establishment are working within a framework of absurdity.
It is impossible for a tube to be filled with "radiation". Radiation would be emitted spherically in all directions from the tube, subject to the inverse square law. That is, unless one was far enough away from the tube for it to be considered a point source. What the tube was filled with is "contamination", which is the source of the radiation. Contamination is the "sh*t"...radiation is the "stink".