Are you implying Google should bring its China practices here? If I type in "warez", I don't care if it's illegal. I want search results and ads based on warez. If Google starts filtering my search results, they can kiss my hundred clicks per day goodbye.
Are you kidding?! I charge $35/hr to install and run SpyBot, Adaware, and AVG (the other option around here is the Geek Squad - I'm doing this town a service). I hit the "Scan" button and watch the money signs fly through the air while making CHA-CHING noises. The extra money helps me pay my rent and utilities. Vista had better be as easy to get through as their previous OS's or I'll be homeless!
Companies sure are getting around these days..
on
1GB CompactFlash Roundup
·
· Score: 3, Informative
I've got a Rosewill case, SanDisk 512mb flash memory chip, Kingston system memory, PNY video card, Lexar 1GB flash stick, and some Rosewill memory on top of that. It seems as though companies are taking bits and pieces from each pie instead of one entire pie (wow, that was the worst analogy I've ever given -- must sleep...).
If the network is microsegmented with multiple dataprocessing units throughout the cities, it would be fairly efficient to deal with that much bandwidth, especially if the dataprocessing units were sending out the results instead of video. Also, I would imagine that bandwidth would be more effectively estimated based on camera numbers, not vehicle numbers.
In all seriousness, I am fine with having cameras tracking my car (assuming it was adopted in America). The only argument I'd give is that it's against our rights, but I have no personal attachment to the position of my car. In fact, I'd LOVE it a criminal stole my car and was brought down only a few miles away because these cameras were able to quickly identify the position of it. Also, I'd like to insert a cliche: I've got nothing to hide.
Slashdot Mirror
Are you implying Google should bring its China practices here? If I type in "warez", I don't care if it's illegal. I want search results and ads based on warez. If Google starts filtering my search results, they can kiss my hundred clicks per day goodbye.
None of you could spot the life-like robotic boy attached to the device after take-off!
Are you kidding?! I charge $35/hr to install and run SpyBot, Adaware, and AVG (the other option around here is the Geek Squad - I'm doing this town a service). I hit the "Scan" button and watch the money signs fly through the air while making CHA-CHING noises. The extra money helps me pay my rent and utilities. Vista had better be as easy to get through as their previous OS's or I'll be homeless!
Starseige Starseige: Tribes Tribes 2 I'm a fanboy, so sue me.
Completed by the 2010 decade, huh. Someone wake me up around the year 20100.
*shrug* Thanks for the mod tho! 3
I've got a Rosewill case, SanDisk 512mb flash memory chip, Kingston system memory, PNY video card, Lexar 1GB flash stick, and some Rosewill memory on top of that. It seems as though companies are taking bits and pieces from each pie instead of one entire pie (wow, that was the worst analogy I've ever given -- must sleep...).
If the network is microsegmented with multiple dataprocessing units throughout the cities, it would be fairly efficient to deal with that much bandwidth, especially if the dataprocessing units were sending out the results instead of video. Also, I would imagine that bandwidth would be more effectively estimated based on camera numbers, not vehicle numbers.
In all seriousness, I am fine with having cameras tracking my car (assuming it was adopted in America). The only argument I'd give is that it's against our rights, but I have no personal attachment to the position of my car. In fact, I'd LOVE it a criminal stole my car and was brought down only a few miles away because these cameras were able to quickly identify the position of it. Also, I'd like to insert a cliche: I've got nothing to hide.
...then you can find the same technology in a standard NIC. I believe it is more commonly refered to as the "Three-way Handshake".