That's not the appropriate solution to that problem and it's hardly desirable to have random applications being killed. The appropriate solution is to ensure that the system processes are higher priority by default and that they stay that way. I've never had a FreeBSD desktop end up bogged down like that when it wasn't result of something going wrong in the kernel. And even that's not something that happens very often. Most of the time it politely panics and resets.
Planning a system where random processes can be terminated without any particular obvious pattern to the end users isn't particularly helpful.
The problem with that legal theory is that child porn charges aren't binary, allowing law enforcement to search through the partition could lead to other charges or increased jail time for the accused.
Sort of like how they bring somebody in for one murder then demand that the accused fess up to any and all other murders or other crimes that the individual might have committed.
No, if you don't provide the subpoenaed the evidence, you're required not to destroy any of it and they just hold you in contempt of court while they execute the relevant search warrants and get in touch with somebody that does know where it is.
The point of subpoenas is that this material is already in existence and accessible, they're just compelling the parties involved to provide all of it. Just because it's been subpoenaed and provided doesn't necessarily mean that the evidence will be admissible in court. Many times when one party or the other can't produce a witness to vouch for the validity of the evidence it can't be admitted as evidence. Sometimes it can be used for illustrative purposes, but not as actual evidence.
The point is that if you don't provide the evidence in a safe, they can hire a locksmith and have it opened on their own. In this case they're bitching about the fact that breaking the encryption would be too time consuming so they want to force the defendant to disclose the key. Now, if that key happens to be written down somewhere, they probably have a point, but if that key is completely in memory, then they're completely out of line requiring that to be disclosed. It's tantamount to requiring a defendant to disclose where the bodies are buried because they can't be arsed to conduct the search.
In that case they execute a search warrant for the gun and if they don't find it they're kind of screwed. I'd like to hear your suggestion as to how they can execute a search warrant on somebody's head.
Providing a password is testifying. In this case it would be a violation of the defendants right to remain silent. Defendants are never required to interpret evidence for the prosecution, or at least not incriminating evidence. As for subpoenaed materials, that's just as a matter of convenience, those materials can generally be collected by the authorities themselves with the relevant search and seizure which is why that's not a Fifth Amendment violation.
In this case this requires forcing the defendant to reveal something that's in his mind without any corroborating evidence.
Not quite, the dark side of the moon is also the side that's facing away from the sun at any given time.
The point is that it's rather difficult to keep things like that secret if there are people with cameras orbiting overhead and being imaged on a regular basis. Being able to do these things under cover of night is a lot easier.
You shouldn't be using liquid water in that calculation. It's not going to be liquid in space unless of course you're intending on keeping it heated the entire way. 9.617 x 10^-1 is a much better umber for that.
Also, you can use some of the oxygen for breathing saving you from having to double up on that with the rest of the gases for the atmosphere. You get the electricity which is a real challenge to get early on. And you're not committed to using all of it for water initially. You can store it for later relatively easy.
Which has it's own problems until we get the trip from the Moon to the Earth down pat. If you spend too much time on the Moon, or in space for that matter, you could easily find yourself in a position where you're no longer able to stand the gravity of the Earth. Somebody may someday find a way of causing bones to adapt to the Earth again, but in the meantime it's a very serious problem.
Most likely you'd be shipping tanks of hydrogen and oxygen and mixing them on the Moon. You don't get any savings in terms of mass, but you get a huge savings in space. The food you'd almost certainly be shipping in and would probably come in some sort of highly concentrated form delivered by unmanned craft.
We can do it, it's mostly a question of whether or not we want it badly enough to do it. Compared with some of the other things we've done lately it should be well within our capabilities. People have been to the moon.
The challenge though is going to be primarily expense, getting the materials to the moon is a relatively well understood problem and most of them can, presumably, be unmanned missions. The real challenge is going to making the base habitable and protected from whatever might fall from the sky.
Well, they are environmentally friendly as long as you ignore how the devices were produced, where the electricity comes from and the effects of having to replace one when the device finally fails. Not to mention the frequent resale of textbooks and that they don't require any energy to work.
The problem is that the law is illegal. Private security doesn't have arresting powers in any state except under very specific conditions. Around here Joe Blow has authority to arrest than private security does. The airports are not Federal property and anybody operating on it has to comply with state law on the matter.
Around here indecent liberties are a forcible felony, which means that legally speaking you have authority to use deadly force if they force you to let them touch your genitals for any reason. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.100
I don't personally recommend trying anything like that as I doubt that the courts would recognize the behavior as legally justifiable, but it is one of your rights around here.
Live munitions are what the TSA is looking for. Despite what the GGP suggests this would be a victory for TSA. The TSA isn't responsible for investigating such things, they're responsible for finding those things. It would be up to the FBI or local law enforcement to determine the rest of the story.
And I definitely agree with the GP. I remember in Boy Scouts spending some time at the rifle range and they were very particular about you returning with the same number of cases as you bought. If you didn't then they'd have to shut the range down and climb down under the platform and find those extra cases.
I'm not sure if they ever had to do so as we all knew to not screw around with the ammo and to just put it in the cup when we were done, but it wouldn't surprise me if they had to do so at some point. In retrospect it's somewhat surprising that the platform had cracks through which cases could fall.
A lot of folks don't know what an arrest is. Any time a person is detained by law enforcement they are arrested. In most cases the officer will either issue a citation or decide that there's no crime committed and allow the person to leave. It's important to understand that as one is never allowed to leave the scene until told that they can leave. Otherwise you can face charges even if there were no basis for charges in the first place.
Indeed, somebody involved really has to exercise some common sense and you can be sure that it's not going to be the advertisers.
I don't mind viewing reasonable text ads and sometimes I even click on them, it's the annoying flash ad crashes and millions of javascripts that have to load and the ones that turn words into links or otherwise make it a pain to view the page that I block with extreme prejudice. If they want me to view the ads then they need to make it a somewhat reasonable proposition. I hate clicking on an ad because the click didn't register initially and when it did there's an ad there.
I disagree, sites with excessive ads are less likely to be providing searchers with information that they actually want and it makes it less likely that ad buyers are going to get what they're paying for.
This is way too soon to be suggesting that this will slip any further. Google can't afford to be caught punishing sites for views.
Same goes for the top 1%, they're doing just fine without their tax cuts. Doesn't stop the whining about how raising taxes on them or failing to renew tax cuts is going to kill American jobs though.
Except that courts, the public square and voting aren't things that the folks with the rifles tend to use for that purpose. There's a correlation between voting for candidates that promise this sort of bad behavior and folks that insist upon owning firearms.
No implication of causation there, just a correlation worth considering when deciding which boxes are likely to get more thoroughly exercised and in what order.
14 months isn't reasonable, this should have been a civil matter, the parties that owned the copyrights are rich enough to be able to file suit. These aren't exactly independent production companies that genuinely can't afford to bring these things to trial, these are rich corporations that would have no problem whatsoever paying to protect their property. This isn't like somebody burgled their office which would be a legitimate reason for the authorities to handle it.
I'm probably going to have to crack my steam games because I'm going somewhere that I'm not going to be able to connect to the internet regularly. Steam is a complete joke when it comes to offline mode. Sometimes you can be offline for months other times it decides that it needs to phone home after a few days.
Slashdot Mirror
That's not the appropriate solution to that problem and it's hardly desirable to have random applications being killed. The appropriate solution is to ensure that the system processes are higher priority by default and that they stay that way. I've never had a FreeBSD desktop end up bogged down like that when it wasn't result of something going wrong in the kernel. And even that's not something that happens very often. Most of the time it politely panics and resets.
Planning a system where random processes can be terminated without any particular obvious pattern to the end users isn't particularly helpful.
Providing the password is translating the data. It's just translating data which nobody else is able to translate this life time.
The problem with that legal theory is that child porn charges aren't binary, allowing law enforcement to search through the partition could lead to other charges or increased jail time for the accused.
Sort of like how they bring somebody in for one murder then demand that the accused fess up to any and all other murders or other crimes that the individual might have committed.
No, if you don't provide the subpoenaed the evidence, you're required not to destroy any of it and they just hold you in contempt of court while they execute the relevant search warrants and get in touch with somebody that does know where it is.
The point of subpoenas is that this material is already in existence and accessible, they're just compelling the parties involved to provide all of it. Just because it's been subpoenaed and provided doesn't necessarily mean that the evidence will be admissible in court. Many times when one party or the other can't produce a witness to vouch for the validity of the evidence it can't be admitted as evidence. Sometimes it can be used for illustrative purposes, but not as actual evidence.
The point is that if you don't provide the evidence in a safe, they can hire a locksmith and have it opened on their own. In this case they're bitching about the fact that breaking the encryption would be too time consuming so they want to force the defendant to disclose the key. Now, if that key happens to be written down somewhere, they probably have a point, but if that key is completely in memory, then they're completely out of line requiring that to be disclosed. It's tantamount to requiring a defendant to disclose where the bodies are buried because they can't be arsed to conduct the search.
In that case they execute a search warrant for the gun and if they don't find it they're kind of screwed. I'd like to hear your suggestion as to how they can execute a search warrant on somebody's head.
Providing a password is testifying. In this case it would be a violation of the defendants right to remain silent. Defendants are never required to interpret evidence for the prosecution, or at least not incriminating evidence. As for subpoenaed materials, that's just as a matter of convenience, those materials can generally be collected by the authorities themselves with the relevant search and seizure which is why that's not a Fifth Amendment violation.
In this case this requires forcing the defendant to reveal something that's in his mind without any corroborating evidence.
Not quite, the dark side of the moon is also the side that's facing away from the sun at any given time.
The point is that it's rather difficult to keep things like that secret if there are people with cameras orbiting overhead and being imaged on a regular basis. Being able to do these things under cover of night is a lot easier.
You shouldn't be using liquid water in that calculation. It's not going to be liquid in space unless of course you're intending on keeping it heated the entire way. 9.617 x 10^-1 is a much better umber for that.
Also, you can use some of the oxygen for breathing saving you from having to double up on that with the rest of the gases for the atmosphere. You get the electricity which is a real challenge to get early on. And you're not committed to using all of it for water initially. You can store it for later relatively easy.
You do realize that the dark side of the moon doesn't always cover the same ground, right?
Which has it's own problems until we get the trip from the Moon to the Earth down pat. If you spend too much time on the Moon, or in space for that matter, you could easily find yourself in a position where you're no longer able to stand the gravity of the Earth. Somebody may someday find a way of causing bones to adapt to the Earth again, but in the meantime it's a very serious problem.
Most likely you'd be shipping tanks of hydrogen and oxygen and mixing them on the Moon. You don't get any savings in terms of mass, but you get a huge savings in space. The food you'd almost certainly be shipping in and would probably come in some sort of highly concentrated form delivered by unmanned craft.
We can do it, it's mostly a question of whether or not we want it badly enough to do it. Compared with some of the other things we've done lately it should be well within our capabilities. People have been to the moon.
The challenge though is going to be primarily expense, getting the materials to the moon is a relatively well understood problem and most of them can, presumably, be unmanned missions. The real challenge is going to making the base habitable and protected from whatever might fall from the sky.
Well, they are environmentally friendly as long as you ignore how the devices were produced, where the electricity comes from and the effects of having to replace one when the device finally fails. Not to mention the frequent resale of textbooks and that they don't require any energy to work.
I did a quick search and apparently the iBook format uses a proprietary CSS which makes it not entirely compatible between itself and ePub.
The problem is that the law is illegal. Private security doesn't have arresting powers in any state except under very specific conditions. Around here Joe Blow has authority to arrest than private security does. The airports are not Federal property and anybody operating on it has to comply with state law on the matter.
Around here indecent liberties are a forcible felony, which means that legally speaking you have authority to use deadly force if they force you to let them touch your genitals for any reason.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.100
I don't personally recommend trying anything like that as I doubt that the courts would recognize the behavior as legally justifiable, but it is one of your rights around here.
Live munitions are what the TSA is looking for. Despite what the GGP suggests this would be a victory for TSA. The TSA isn't responsible for investigating such things, they're responsible for finding those things. It would be up to the FBI or local law enforcement to determine the rest of the story.
And I definitely agree with the GP. I remember in Boy Scouts spending some time at the rifle range and they were very particular about you returning with the same number of cases as you bought. If you didn't then they'd have to shut the range down and climb down under the platform and find those extra cases.
I'm not sure if they ever had to do so as we all knew to not screw around with the ammo and to just put it in the cup when we were done, but it wouldn't surprise me if they had to do so at some point. In retrospect it's somewhat surprising that the platform had cracks through which cases could fall.
A lot of folks don't know what an arrest is. Any time a person is detained by law enforcement they are arrested. In most cases the officer will either issue a citation or decide that there's no crime committed and allow the person to leave. It's important to understand that as one is never allowed to leave the scene until told that they can leave. Otherwise you can face charges even if there were no basis for charges in the first place.
Indeed, somebody involved really has to exercise some common sense and you can be sure that it's not going to be the advertisers.
I don't mind viewing reasonable text ads and sometimes I even click on them, it's the annoying flash ad crashes and millions of javascripts that have to load and the ones that turn words into links or otherwise make it a pain to view the page that I block with extreme prejudice. If they want me to view the ads then they need to make it a somewhat reasonable proposition. I hate clicking on an ad because the click didn't register initially and when it did there's an ad there.
I disagree, sites with excessive ads are less likely to be providing searchers with information that they actually want and it makes it less likely that ad buyers are going to get what they're paying for.
This is way too soon to be suggesting that this will slip any further. Google can't afford to be caught punishing sites for views.
Same goes for the top 1%, they're doing just fine without their tax cuts. Doesn't stop the whining about how raising taxes on them or failing to renew tax cuts is going to kill American jobs though.
I get ICE, technically I'm sure some of those downloads were international. What I really don't get is why the DHS is involved in this at all.
Except that courts, the public square and voting aren't things that the folks with the rifles tend to use for that purpose. There's a correlation between voting for candidates that promise this sort of bad behavior and folks that insist upon owning firearms.
No implication of causation there, just a correlation worth considering when deciding which boxes are likely to get more thoroughly exercised and in what order.
14 months isn't reasonable, this should have been a civil matter, the parties that owned the copyrights are rich enough to be able to file suit. These aren't exactly independent production companies that genuinely can't afford to bring these things to trial, these are rich corporations that would have no problem whatsoever paying to protect their property. This isn't like somebody burgled their office which would be a legitimate reason for the authorities to handle it.
I'm probably going to have to crack my steam games because I'm going somewhere that I'm not going to be able to connect to the internet regularly. Steam is a complete joke when it comes to offline mode. Sometimes you can be offline for months other times it decides that it needs to phone home after a few days.