How about instead of just saying "See RFC 3675" you point out exactly what the rfc says what about an.xxx domain would cause problems. From the link the objections they raise seem to be:
Linguistic Problems - I think many languages can get along with.xxx for porn without incident.
Explosion of Top Level Domain Names (TLDs) - Seeing as were only talking about one more root level domain I dont think we need to worry about this.
You Can't Control What Names Point At You! - So what? Will some people try to fudge with the domain names? What would be the point? We aren't trying to codify a new law here, just expand what DNS is all about. If some people are intent on hosting porn on a.com server that is fine. Most people probably would see benifits in conforming to the new standards.
Slashdot Mirror
brian0918 has pointed to out how the GP is incorrect, why is it still modded up? Talk about flaws in voting...
How about instead of just saying "See RFC 3675" you point out exactly what the rfc says what about an .xxx domain would cause problems. From the link the objections they raise seem to be:
.xxx for porn without incident.
.com server that is fine. Most people probably would see benifits in conforming to the new standards.
Linguistic Problems - I think many languages can get along with
Explosion of Top Level Domain Names (TLDs) - Seeing as were only talking about one more root level domain I dont think we need to worry about this.
You Can't Control What Names Point At You! - So what? Will some people try to fudge with the domain names? What would be the point? We aren't trying to codify a new law here, just expand what DNS is all about. If some people are intent on hosting porn on a