Slashdot Mirror


User: SorryTomato

SorryTomato's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
26
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 26

  1. Re:not really on Automating Future Aircraft Carriers · · Score: 1

    Which is sort of unfortunate, because the new boats are soft targets; they can't absorb fire and keep on fighting -- the assumption is that they won't get hit by anything, which seems like a dubious assumption. No the assumption is that traditional armor is useless for protecting the most vital and vulnerable part of a warship - all those sensors and antennas topside. An modern IOWA style ship would effectively be considered unarmored as it still cannot take a hit and remain combat effective. A ship (or tank or aircraft or a soldier) is useless without eyes.