Anyone else notice they're only acheiving 60% reliability, and that number actually DROPS?
Seems far from reliable evidence to me, especially given a totally random prediction should be expected to hit 50% reliability.
What they're really doing is measuring first impulses, which would rationally be more likely to be chosen when the decision has absolutely NO real importance. (Left or Right button? Are you even kidding me?)
Slashdot Mirror
Anyone else notice they're only acheiving 60% reliability, and that number actually DROPS? Seems far from reliable evidence to me, especially given a totally random prediction should be expected to hit 50% reliability. What they're really doing is measuring first impulses, which would rationally be more likely to be chosen when the decision has absolutely NO real importance. (Left or Right button? Are you even kidding me?)