If ChromeOS could run a slicer and something like Pronterface, I'd be happy.
For now, Windows 10 is the viable solution. Dual-boot to Ubuntu, better. GCodePrintr could be one part of that.
But I can use my M8 when I retire it, as a controller, and not bother with another notebook-sized device where space is already tight. I can velcro the M8 in place.
I expect Internet search, social media, messaging services to be honest - if they claim to be impartial truthful, I expect them to show me results that are that.
Hillary defines 'them' mostly as Bernie does. Two for one there. The who should be obvious by now, but for clarification, I am one of 'them'.
Johnson seems to define 'them' as other politicians and their lackeys. He may be a poet in hiding. He seems sincere, but don't they all?
Cruz defined 'them' as Democrats and their sponsors, I think. He neglected the leadership of his own party, largely to his detriment.
Trump of course changes his definition to fit the occasion. This is either pandering or opportunism, with a healthy dose of carnival barker thrown in. The rest should be paying attention to his tactics. Hillary would have to change very little to be like Trump. Bernie, well, tougher. Johnson is not playing the same game, so he isn't losing, he's just irrelevant. For now. Nothing is certain yet.
The rest of the Republican elves could not distinguish themselves, and no longer get my words beyond dismissal.
0. "Out of curiosity, is it safe to assume you've never actually owned or been involved in running a business?" It is not. I have been both, though starting a business may not count, right?
1. I feel the Bern, right in my back pocket. His brand of cronyism will destroy us all, even businesses. Hillary will try at least to save Wall Street, despite her protests. Trump will of course change little in this regard.
So help me here. By relaxing the commercial operator restrictions to those similar to hobby restrictions, this is reasonable in you view? Why?
ps - I'm not trying to make businesses appear evil. I'm trying to expose the government as so business-friendly when it's to their liking that it's indistinguishable from a bought-and-paid-for agency. I'm actually more in agreement with you than you think, but that's unclear without checking the list of items to satisfy our mutual distrusts.
Think of it as a favor. OR crony corporatism, if you prefer. Same thing. Corporations can do this, but John Q. Citizen has different rules, because, business.
Seems like a feature to me. Solution? Beyond hard forking and a reset of the DAO, perhaps not allowing recursive splits.
This is debugging in 'real'-life. How many online games have you played where you bought in-game swag and it was stolen/destroyed? Yeah, I don't either. Right.
Agreed, I had been using IME for long time. This is not new. In fact, it's so old I expect that if it were compromised, those exploits are in their 3rd generation by now. The one where sovereign hackers usurp the previously installed tools and the fight is for the C&C net.
And I suspect it has been tried, repeatedly. By everyone of note.
Hardly. We should respect each other, without the threat of force.
But already we've lost civility in so many areas of American society that indeed, you can be beaten for attending a political rally, and the state will watch, if they don't much like the headliner.
Rule 0; If everyone at the poker table has a gun, someone is going to get shot.
Rule 1; If everyone at the poker table checks their gun at the door, you only need a gun outside the door.
I'm not ready to carry my handgun yet - I haven't yet completed training in how to carry safely and use properly (including learning how to evaluate situations and use force appropriately), but if/when I do, I will probably not carry it to a poker game. But I might to a public event. And where I live, I can carry unconcealed, legally, and indeed you often can find someone carrying an AR-15 style rifle, openly, both to exercise their rights and to give full warning to the criminals, that they will be opposed.
And, frankly, if everyone were armed all the time, pretty soon we would stop shooting each other and probably stop shouting and calling each other bad names. After the initial and saddening culling. But that happens in slow-motion now. I cite Chicago. Give everyone in public housing training, range time, and a functional handgun with ammo, and watch the gang shootings go elsewhere. In time, those public housing residents would pay little attention to where their issued handgun was. It would not be needed.
No it does not. It also requires tenants to either report crimes or cooperate with the police. If my tenant has an RO against their partner or anyone, they are expected to report violations. If the RO is against a fellow tenant, that requires me to evict the transgressor. And for me to cooperate with the police.
Sadly, the only instance where that was the issue, the loss of income cost me all the tenants. They had to move in with family.
In American, yes, a landlord could be sued and have to defend their choice.
And I am a landlord. I don't ask questions that aren't
0. Necessary - marital status, sex/gender, sexual orientation for instance. 1. Legally permitted - sexual orientation, family status (children, marital status), physical handicaps, education, citizenship (as in whether they are a citizen anywhere, since it is legally murky in Arizona to ask if they are in the US legally).
I do ask some questions that are interesting and may some day be illegal:
0. Criminal record excepting traffic and civil actions with one exception noted below. 1. Pets expected to reside with the applicant. 2. Employment, basic info without salary/pay details. 3. Prior evictions (questions about prior disputes with landlords are not permitted, so far as I know).
I rent regularly to people with felonies, as most complexes refuse to, and do not pull a credit check, as we usually have multiple applicants and any flags on the application would make them second or lower choices. And I regularly rent to first-timers who have little success with the complexes. And my tenants sign a 'crime-free addendum' the local police recommend, legally permitting me to evict them with 3 days' notice if the police respond to criminal complaints, or anyone is arrested on the premises, or the police inform me that known convicts are found on the premises during an investigation. Intended to put a stop to absent landlords ignoring drug and gang activity, which is a problem here as this community is a gang hangout since at least the 80s. So far I have not had to invoke it, and it has saved one tenant from difficulty saying 'no' to friends needing a place to crash and do their illegal business. One such 'friend' called me to complain. I asked that one to wait while I conferenced in the local police substation so they could further explain the addendum. Click.
It's not that hard to be a landlord. But common sense goes a long ways, Who your tenants sleep with or how they dress doesn't mean anything. Whether they can earn money to pay the rent, and if they can avoid burning the place down, or if they import their drug sales business, those things matter.
Slashdot Mirror
If ChromeOS could run a slicer and something like Pronterface, I'd be happy.
For now, Windows 10 is the viable solution. Dual-boot to Ubuntu, better. GCodePrintr could be one part of that.
But I can use my M8 when I retire it, as a controller, and not bother with another notebook-sized device where space is already tight. I can velcro the M8 in place.
This is the problem. What is 'extremist'?
I suspect that if defined by the alleged victims, it will be at least the opinions of those they disagree with.
And it becomes censorship.
I expect Internet search, social media, messaging services to be honest - if they claim to be impartial truthful, I expect them to show me results that are that.
If they intend to filter or censor, just tell me.
That would be a loss...
'Ferocity'.
You clearly define that differently than I do.
Hillary defines 'them' mostly as Bernie does. Two for one there. The who should be obvious by now, but for clarification, I am one of 'them'.
Johnson seems to define 'them' as other politicians and their lackeys. He may be a poet in hiding. He seems sincere, but don't they all?
Cruz defined 'them' as Democrats and their sponsors, I think. He neglected the leadership of his own party, largely to his detriment.
Trump of course changes his definition to fit the occasion. This is either pandering or opportunism, with a healthy dose of carnival barker thrown in. The rest should be paying attention to his tactics. Hillary would have to change very little to be like Trump. Bernie, well, tougher. Johnson is not playing the same game, so he isn't losing, he's just irrelevant. For now. Nothing is certain yet.
The rest of the Republican elves could not distinguish themselves, and no longer get my words beyond dismissal.
Please clarify - which candidate? I can't tell which of six you're referring to.
0. "Out of curiosity, is it safe to assume you've never actually owned or been involved in running a business?" It is not. I have been both, though starting a business may not count, right?
1. I feel the Bern, right in my back pocket. His brand of cronyism will destroy us all, even businesses. Hillary will try at least to save Wall Street, despite her protests. Trump will of course change little in this regard.
So help me here. By relaxing the commercial operator restrictions to those similar to hobby restrictions, this is reasonable in you view? Why?
ps - I'm not trying to make businesses appear evil. I'm trying to expose the government as so business-friendly when it's to their liking that it's indistinguishable from a bought-and-paid-for agency. I'm actually more in agreement with you than you think, but that's unclear without checking the list of items to satisfy our mutual distrusts.
You don't think the Democrats want to spy on us?
Think of it as a favor. OR crony corporatism, if you prefer. Same thing. Corporations can do this, but John Q. Citizen has different rules, because, business.
Whoosh...
"Someone left a bug in the contract"
Seems like a feature to me. Solution? Beyond hard forking and a reset of the DAO, perhaps not allowing recursive splits.
This is debugging in 'real'-life. How many online games have you played where you bought in-game swag and it was stolen/destroyed? Yeah, I don't either. Right.
As if a wind-up satellite wouldn't suffice.
Already got this...
Agreed, I had been using IME for long time. This is not new. In fact, it's so old I expect that if it were compromised, those exploits are in their 3rd generation by now. The one where sovereign hackers usurp the previously installed tools and the fight is for the C&C net.
And I suspect it has been tried, repeatedly. By everyone of note.
Wireless charging with an aluminum case is a challenge. One doomed to fail.
And I luv aluminum.
Hardly. We should respect each other, without the threat of force.
But already we've lost civility in so many areas of American society that indeed, you can be beaten for attending a political rally, and the state will watch, if they don't much like the headliner.
Rule 0; If everyone at the poker table has a gun, someone is going to get shot.
Rule 1; If everyone at the poker table checks their gun at the door, you only need a gun outside the door.
I'm not ready to carry my handgun yet - I haven't yet completed training in how to carry safely and use properly (including learning how to evaluate situations and use force appropriately), but if/when I do, I will probably not carry it to a poker game. But I might to a public event. And where I live, I can carry unconcealed, legally, and indeed you often can find someone carrying an AR-15 style rifle, openly, both to exercise their rights and to give full warning to the criminals, that they will be opposed.
And, frankly, if everyone were armed all the time, pretty soon we would stop shooting each other and probably stop shouting and calling each other bad names. After the initial and saddening culling. But that happens in slow-motion now. I cite Chicago. Give everyone in public housing training, range time, and a functional handgun with ammo, and watch the gang shootings go elsewhere. In time, those public housing residents would pay little attention to where their issued handgun was. It would not be needed.
I've figured out that the design /production team has these mandates ;
Executive management wants reduced costs.
Product owners want product that is on par with the competition.
Dev team managers (yay, plural) want achievable goals.
I work on a servicing team. I want either functional product or what to tell customers when it isn't.
Agile has changed the time frame of failure from months/years to weeks. Can I define that as success?
No it does not. It also requires tenants to either report crimes or cooperate with the police. If my tenant has an RO against their partner or anyone, they are expected to report violations. If the RO is against a fellow tenant, that requires me to evict the transgressor. And for me to cooperate with the police.
Sadly, the only instance where that was the issue, the loss of income cost me all the tenants. They had to move in with family.
As a landlord, I can't imagine asking applicants for social media access. No good can come of it. None.
In American, yes, a landlord could be sued and have to defend their choice.
And I am a landlord. I don't ask questions that aren't
0. Necessary - marital status, sex/gender, sexual orientation for instance.
1. Legally permitted - sexual orientation, family status (children, marital status), physical handicaps, education, citizenship (as in whether they are a citizen anywhere, since it is legally murky in Arizona to ask if they are in the US legally).
I do ask some questions that are interesting and may some day be illegal:
0. Criminal record excepting traffic and civil actions with one exception noted below.
1. Pets expected to reside with the applicant.
2. Employment, basic info without salary/pay details.
3. Prior evictions (questions about prior disputes with landlords are not permitted, so far as I know).
I rent regularly to people with felonies, as most complexes refuse to, and do not pull a credit check, as we usually have multiple applicants and any flags on the application would make them second or lower choices. And I regularly rent to first-timers who have little success with the complexes. And my tenants sign a 'crime-free addendum' the local police recommend, legally permitting me to evict them with 3 days' notice if the police respond to criminal complaints, or anyone is arrested on the premises, or the police inform me that known convicts are found on the premises during an investigation. Intended to put a stop to absent landlords ignoring drug and gang activity, which is a problem here as this community is a gang hangout since at least the 80s. So far I have not had to invoke it, and it has saved one tenant from difficulty saying 'no' to friends needing a place to crash and do their illegal business. One such 'friend' called me to complain. I asked that one to wait while I conferenced in the local police substation so they could further explain the addendum. Click.
It's not that hard to be a landlord. But common sense goes a long ways, Who your tenants sleep with or how they dress doesn't mean anything. Whether they can earn money to pay the rent, and if they can avoid burning the place down, or if they import their drug sales business, those things matter.
So am I. Your point?
Which people?
Well, at least you understand all this.
Cruz 'dumb...'?
Never mind. I thought you were somewhat serious Cruz may be mired in his philosophy, but dumb isn't applicable.
People who don't agree with you aren't always dumb.