For one the target people are the ones who had the biggest marketing and deployment base. Which was the people who were using the windoze software. In other words why even bother with people who used a mac because the majority uses windoze software. Its still only a small base who use a mac compared to the latter.
Hello Actually this is a fake Hello. This post also fake. I am typing it on a keyboard disguised as a typewriter. That is also fake. My name is also fake it should read Joe Tea. No wait that is also fake. This is also fake C YA
This can be also found here http://board.iexbeta.com/index.php?showtopic=31202
Note the date and there is a link to the same site that slashdot has. Come up with
some new stuff not rehashed blab. Although still funny.
Maybe everyone should remember the sites they visited when they got JACKED. Its a big chore but maybe putting up those sites will also force the hands of those companies to take action. One that I came across awhile back was from NEXTEL and SPRINT. Just a thought.
I have been running into some companies that use gpl apps without the proper lic. or sources. They have different interfaces than the original gpled app. These are then resold to other companies with another interface. So one GPLed app could be had by other companies with only a different interface and no one would know. Until someone looks for it. There are also resellers of applications that are just using Gpled code. Not to mention some outsourcing companies creating applications for various companies in the US and outside of its boarders. Some of these turned out to be directly taken from GLPed code. All without the proper lic. and credits or without sources. One example is the CD/DVD burning and ripping software market. These may be only just one of a lot of reasons but don't qoute me or anything. I am no lawyer
Slashdot Mirror
For one the target people are the ones who had the biggest marketing and deployment base. Which was
the people who were using the windoze software. In other words why even bother with people who used a
mac because the majority uses windoze software. Its still only a small base who use a mac compared to
the latter.
The only thing this code has to offer is the number to an endless account at an atm.
Hello
Actually this is a fake Hello. This post also fake. I am typing it on a keyboard disguised as a typewriter. That is also fake. My name is also fake it should read Joe Tea. No wait that is also fake.
This is also fake C YA
This can be also found here http://board.iexbeta.com/index.php?showtopic=31202
Note the date and there is a link to the same site that slashdot has. Come up with
some new stuff not rehashed blab. Although still funny.
Yep it is old news. I also ran across this while doing some research on the JUICEBOX product that contained uClinux.
Maybe everyone should remember the sites they visited when they got JACKED. Its a big chore but maybe putting up those sites will also force the hands of those companies to take action. One that I came across awhile back was from NEXTEL and SPRINT. Just a thought.
I have been running into some companies that use gpl apps without the proper lic. or sources. They have different interfaces than the original gpled app. These are then resold to other companies with another interface. So one GPLed app could be had by other companies with only a different interface and no one would know. Until someone looks for it. There are also resellers of applications that are just using Gpled code. Not to mention some outsourcing companies creating applications for various companies in the US and outside of its boarders. Some of these turned out to be directly taken from GLPed code. All without the proper lic. and credits or without sources. One example is the CD/DVD burning and ripping software market. These may be only just one of a lot of reasons but don't qoute me or anything. I am no lawyer