The tests, which found that Windows performed as well as Linux on legacy hardware when installed and run out-of-the-box, were done in part to give Microsoft the data it needed to effectively 'put to rest the myth that Linux can run on anything.'"
There's a huge logical fallacy here. One OSs success on a particular platform does not nullify another's. I can't disprove that you had bacon for breakfast by proving that I had sausage. I can't even do that if we eat breakfast at the same table!
1. Think. 2. Talk.
That's the proper order of operations and the above mythbuster should stick to it.
Slashdot Mirror
There's a huge logical fallacy here. One OSs success on a particular platform does not nullify another's. I can't disprove that you had bacon for breakfast by proving that I had sausage. I can't even do that if we eat breakfast at the same table!
1. Think. 2. Talk.
That's the proper order of operations and the above mythbuster should stick to it.