But if you're not exposed to the advertising, you're not going to spend so much money, and you'll have more left to support the site through donations.
Have you seen that business model work for anyone who wants more than $3000 a month in revenue?
I'm sure/I hope if I'm missing something it will be pointed out...
I usually use sudo aptitude search subversion, which helpfully lists any packages with subversion in the name. I'm sure there's a way to do that from the graphical package manager, but I don't use it.
I believe that his basic premis can be extended: "If it can be thought, it can be done."
I've always understood his basic premise to be "I must doubt everything -- everything can be an illusion -- except the fact of my doubt, which gives me confidence that I do exist."
Once people realize they're being fed misinformation, demand will surge for a local paper with news closer to the truth, and individuals will see that demand and want to cash in on it. They will create new newspapers to fill that demand. The only thing that could stop that from happening is the barrel of a gun backed by a law.
... or apathy, which explains why it hasn't happened much at all.
Your point about the licence fee and different ways of accessing content is correct, we should be treated equally, regardless of OS / Browser / Device. Having said that I'm happy to cut the BBC a little slack in this.
Good point. Non-Windows machines have only been accessing the Internet for some 40 years now.
If you believe putting "Vista Capable" on something that does indeed run Vista, but doesn't run the whole whoosh-whoosh warrants a class action lawsuit for "fraud"...
That's the legal question the lawsuit asks. I realize when you're King of The Cosmos you can impose tort reform and magically dismiss this case, but I certainly didn't vote for you.
If it's perl, he should shift to php as soon as possible, because perl code becomes very hard to maintain the longer it goes...
Citations, please.
Feel free to throw out any studies or (especially) anecdotes where the Perl programmers did not write effective test cases, did not refactor regularly, and did not take advantage of the breadth and depth of prior work found on the CPAN (including Perl::Critic, Perl::Tidy, and Test::Class).
Those are the techniques I expect from any professional development team, regardless of language. I've seen Perl teams use those techniques effectively -- so I doubt that any problem you've had is the result of the language.
Try reusing Perl code, outside of stuff written to be part of a Perl Module (.pm).
It's often easier to reuse code designed to be reused. You're dangerously close to tautology here.
DSL's let you mold Ruby into something else that you'd like Ruby to be.
... sort of like APIs in other languages, except that most other APIs don't require you to learn the ins and outs of Ruby's particular parser corner cases if you want to debug things.
Perhaps you're not taking sexual assault seriously enough. Do you honestly think anyone deserves it?
Don't presume...
Don't presume that I've never run a mail server, that I don't believe convicted spammers deserve the full consequences of the law, and that I don't have loved ones who have survived sexual assault.
Slashdot Mirror
Have you seen that business model work for anyone who wants more than $3000 a month in revenue?
There's the problem. You assumed that there's a single dominant opinion.
I usually use sudo aptitude search subversion , which helpfully lists any packages with subversion in the name. I'm sure there's a way to do that from the graphical package manager, but I don't use it.
That's a dirty lie.
I've always understood his basic premise to be "I must doubt everything -- everything can be an illusion -- except the fact of my doubt, which gives me confidence that I do exist."
So that's a no then? The difference between an airplane, a building, and the software is that the design of the software is the finished product.
... or apathy, which explains why it hasn't happened much at all.
Microsoft hardly invented the idea.
Do you know the difference between a building, an airplane, and a piece of software?
Equal access regardless of platform has been a feature of the Internet for a while. If you break that feature, you have to do it deliberately.
Good point. Non-Windows machines have only been accessing the Internet for some 40 years now.
I expect something called a computer to be a general purpose computing device, not an appliance.
That's the legal question the lawsuit asks. I realize when you're King of The Cosmos you can impose tort reform and magically dismiss this case, but I certainly didn't vote for you.
I don't particularly care about Windows, but fraud is certainly illegal.
Begin?
Citations, please.
Feel free to throw out any studies or (especially) anecdotes where the Perl programmers did not write effective test cases, did not refactor regularly, and did not take advantage of the breadth and depth of prior work found on the CPAN (including Perl::Critic, Perl::Tidy, and Test::Class).
Those are the techniques I expect from any professional development team, regardless of language. I've seen Perl teams use those techniques effectively -- so I doubt that any problem you've had is the result of the language.
Your math is too simple. Theaters keep some of that money for themselves.
What does this have to do with the GPL?
No, it's a "You can't debug a kernel containing obfuscated binary blobs" situation.
The Linux kernel still supports more devices.
It's often easier to reuse code designed to be reused. You're dangerously close to tautology here.
... sort of like APIs in other languages, except that most other APIs don't require you to learn the ins and outs of Ruby's particular parser corner cases if you want to debug things.
... and full of magic unicorn fairy dust powers which suddenly turn teams unable to write decent code into gods among men.
Then they're not really DSLs, are they?
It's somewhat easier--and consequently cheaper--to make a bit-perfect duplicate of a piece of software than a physical book.
History rarely supports repeating experiments.
Perhaps you're not taking sexual assault seriously enough. Do you honestly think anyone deserves it?
Don't presume that I've never run a mail server, that I don't believe convicted spammers deserve the full consequences of the law, and that I don't have loved ones who have survived sexual assault.
How does that make it okay to equate rape with justice?