The question is entirely irrelevant. It is answered in the First Amendment. It seems that the askee wants special status in the constitution and the right to take time-off for religious "holidays" and perhaps an entry as a victimized religion in a federal hate-crimes bill.
Fact is, these "cusp" religions don't play any factor in the role of government -- nor should they.
-Respect
Eazy-E pointed out what a "studio gangsta" Dre was 7 or so years ago. Dre isn't hard core like us -- he isn't even from Compton. It's just like Eazy-E said:
"now you think you're bigger, but to me you ain't nothing but a bitch ass nigger. Who ain't worth a food stamp, but at Death Row, I hear you're getting treated like bootcamp. Gotta follow your seargent's directions, or get yo ass pumped by a Smith and Wesson...."
Figure it out Dre, the slashdot community sides with our late boy Eazy. What's more, if this lawsuit doesn't stop -- my nutz will be firmly planted on your chin. --
This is a Linux Information Resource, so I'd expect some Linux bias. However, there was little exaggeration or mudslinging in the timeline. The Mozilla Project's loss of Zawicki, security holes, and "kernel panics" (lack of ISDN support, etc.) were all mentioned -- these were certainly setbacks to the Open Source movement.
I think that you any propaganda you saw is benign. I found this timeline to be both entertaining and informative. Perhaps the tinting on your spectacles is too dark.
By the way, the results of the second test were mentioned:
The Mindcraft benchmark is rerun with Linux experts present. NT still wins; Linux comes out with set of things to fix. Many of the fixes happen within a few weeks.
There's but one mistake in your comment -- the most common mistake in intelligencia today. "GL", "Sp" et al are not acronyms. "GL" is an initialism and "Sp" is an abbreviation. Acronyms refer to word/phrase shortenings that are pronounced as words (ie. "Nortel" for Northern Telecom).
Appreciate the breadth of your mathematical knowledge. Thanks for posting.
One question for you: if this is dull math, what do you consider interesting?
There is inherent danger in government overregulation. "Duopolies" and cartels are rarely desired in laissez-faire economics, however, they generally occur in industries with high operating overhead (broadcast media, telecom, etc...). Restrictions on such companies are sometimes necessary, but the government viewership limitations you cited hardly constitutes a big business "payoff".
Anyhow, let's quickly examine the issue at hand: internet taxation. Clearly, the global nature of E-commerce and the sheer number of emptors and vendors prohibit a fair taxation scheme. McCain understands that the internet is best left (relatively) unregulated and should be commended for taking such a stance.
While it may be a tough pill to swallow for the Democrat Slashers, the GOP seems to hold similar views to the internet that most anti-regulatory zealots do. McCain would have my vote (if I wasn't Canadian).
Slashdot Mirror
The question is entirely irrelevant. It is answered in the First Amendment. It seems that the askee wants special status in the constitution and the right to take time-off for religious "holidays" and perhaps an entry as a victimized religion in a federal hate-crimes bill. Fact is, these "cusp" religions don't play any factor in the role of government -- nor should they. -Respect
It's just like Eazy-E said:
Figure it out Dre, the slashdot community sides with our late boy Eazy. What's more, if this lawsuit doesn't stop -- my nutz will be firmly planted on your chin.
--
I think that you any propaganda you saw is benign. I found this timeline to be both entertaining and informative. Perhaps the tinting on your spectacles is too dark.
By the way, the results of the second test were mentioned:
Appreciate the breadth of your mathematical knowledge. Thanks for posting.
One question for you: if this is dull math, what do you consider interesting?
Salut.
There is inherent danger in government overregulation. "Duopolies" and cartels are rarely desired in laissez-faire economics, however, they generally occur in industries with high operating overhead (broadcast media, telecom, etc...). Restrictions on such companies are sometimes necessary, but the government viewership limitations you cited hardly constitutes a big business "payoff".
Anyhow, let's quickly examine the issue at hand: internet taxation. Clearly, the global nature of E-commerce and the sheer number of emptors and vendors prohibit a fair taxation scheme. McCain understands that the internet is best left (relatively) unregulated and should be commended for taking such a stance.
While it may be a tough pill to swallow for the Democrat Slashers, the GOP seems to hold similar views to the internet that most anti-regulatory zealots do. McCain would have my vote (if I wasn't Canadian).