The real reason gasoline was forced as the fuel of choice in the first place was the petroleum industries leveraging and the govt interests in control.
You see anybody and their mother can grow hemp for industrial use. (Fuel derivatives being one of them)
And so went the mind warping of America to convince people that we were besigned by the evil 'marijuana' plant, the same plant in wide spread use by people since the country was formed. Note that Hemp and 'pot' are similar, but you can't get high off Hemp. Yet still the powers that be had Hemp thrown in the same pile, and it was effectivly band
Of course history shows the driving forces behind the effective banning of hemp were the petroleum and paper (that motherfucker Hearst) industries.
FACT: The diesel engine was *first* designed to run on hemp oil.
IMAGINE: The entire trucking industry using a locally reproducable, economical, enviromentally neutral fuel.
IT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED, but the aristocracy decided against this for you.
Walker will have to get FAA clearance before he launches his rocket. The FAA will review the design of the craft as well as the flight plan before considering issuing a license. --------
Leave it to the government to fuck with a man's dreams. Screw'um! Do it anyway..
Debian supported this using dselect. The 'FTP' method has been around as long as I can remember and my frist Debian install was 1.0.1 (?) Around early 1996 (?)
run dselect, Cursor down once to 'update'. Hit return about 5 times, and it goes from there to 'Select' to 'Install', automatically selecting all newer packages, downloading, then installing them.
I'm sure there were external ways to call this but I never looked into it.
You could just as well argue that taking incurs a gain. There is a gain here.
You could. Of course you could argue just about anything else of equal stupidity. (Try looking up 'take', 'receive', 'loss', and 'gain' at http://www.m-w.com/)
The point is the 'victim' in the case can show no loss. All they can show is the lack of a potientcial gain.
To steal you must take. A taking incurs a loss. There is no loss here.
Now you could argue (dumbly) that it is a loss because they would have made money had xxx person purchase this. But this shit only exists in the minds of sick fucks otherwise know as lawyers.
It's not a loss. It's lack of a gain.
This is why 'piracy' requires it's own set of laws, because the common law act of robbery (aka theft) does not apply.
Does anyone ever read the thing? This is not (directly) a self incrimination issue. They are not trying to (directly) force the key out of him. It's a property issue.
"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Send the fuckers a bill for $100 million for his (patentable?) intelectual property, then put a lien against the government when they don't pay. Then when they bitch, start seizing the funds from their bank accounts.
Now the govt does tend to get a little bit pissed off when you do shit like this. (And yes I know of people that have)
Not quite, but please read article 9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
#1) The FCC exists and acts unconstitionally; the congress was outside it's legal authority establishing it.
(See Art 1 Sec 8, Amd 1, Amd 9, and Amd 10)
#2) Corporations are not natural people. They exist only in the legal fiction (laws) created by the State. Without s State, you can not have a corporation. So you can see your post does not make much sense to us Anarchists.
#3) Businesses does not force you to do things at the barrel of a gun. Governments do. Businesses that do, are government. It's obvious which one you stand more to lose to...
#4) Man has not 'flocked' to government. He has been forced into it by other men. I don't see any of us having much of a choice, now do we? (Also Historically the minimal and governmentless societies have been the most peaceful. (IE Celts vs Romans)
#5) Anarchism is not justified by the ideal that men are basically good. It is justified that men are bascially evil, and it is exactly those men that should not have priviledge over other men.
(In plain english. It's those same scumbags that make up the govenment...only a HIGHER percentage)
#6) It is time for the aristocracy (governments) of the world to step aside and let men live free.
They do nothing for you, only to you. Only the 'house nigger mentality' can justify otherwise.
People need to seriously start considering the health risks of living with constant high frequency RF. As an EE/CE, I don't feel very comfortable talking on cell phones a long time. I sure as hell don't want tons of 2.4GHz traffic beaming through my house. (BTW that's about the same wave length as a microwave oven)
Slashdot Mirror
The real reason gasoline was forced as the fuel of choice in the first place was the petroleum industries leveraging and the govt interests in control.
You see anybody and their mother can grow hemp for industrial use. (Fuel derivatives being one of them)
And so went the mind warping of America to convince people that we were besigned by the evil 'marijuana' plant, the same plant in wide spread use by people since the country was formed. Note that Hemp and 'pot' are similar, but you can't get high off Hemp. Yet still the powers that be had Hemp thrown in the same pile, and it was effectivly band
Of course history shows the driving forces behind the effective banning of hemp were the petroleum and paper (that motherfucker Hearst) industries.
FACT: The diesel engine was *first* designed to run on hemp oil.
IMAGINE: The entire trucking industry using a locally reproducable, economical, enviromentally neutral fuel.
IT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED, but the aristocracy decided against this for you.
Get my gun...
Walker will have to get FAA clearance before he launches his rocket. The FAA will review the design of the craft as well as the flight plan before considering issuing a license.
--------
Leave it to the government to fuck with a man's dreams. Screw'um! Do it anyway..
Undisputable Fact: Free men own weapons. Slaves don't.
The impeachment process starts here
Debian supported this using dselect. The 'FTP' method has been around as long as I can remember and my frist Debian install was 1.0.1 (?) Around early 1996 (?)
run dselect,
Cursor down once to 'update'. Hit return about 5 times, and it goes from there to 'Select' to 'Install', automatically selecting all newer packages, downloading, then installing them.
I'm sure there were external ways to call this but I never looked into it.
You could just as well argue that taking incurs a gain. There is a gain here.
You could. Of course you could argue just about anything else of equal stupidity. (Try looking up 'take', 'receive', 'loss', and 'gain' at http://www.m-w.com/)
The point is the 'victim' in the case can show no loss. All they can show is the lack of a potientcial gain.
I care that when you copy and distribute his mp3s, you are breaking the law
I don't care about the law. Nor for any other instruments of the duelistic mind.
and you are stealing his art.
To steal you must take. A taking incurs a loss. There is no loss here.
Now you could argue (dumbly) that it is a loss because they would have made money had xxx person purchase this. But this shit only exists in the minds of sick fucks otherwise know as lawyers.
It's not a loss. It's lack of a gain.
This is why 'piracy' requires it's own set of laws, because the common law act of robbery (aka theft) does not apply.
Does anyone ever read the thing? This is not (directly) a self incrimination issue. They are not trying to (directly) force the key out of him. It's a property issue.
"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Send the fuckers a bill for $100 million for his (patentable?) intelectual property, then put a lien against the government when they don't pay. Then when they bitch, start seizing the funds from their bank accounts.
Now the govt does tend to get a little bit pissed off when you do shit like this. (And yes I know of people that have)
Of course it's just fine when the IRS does it....
Not quite, but please read article 9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
#1) The FCC exists and acts unconstitionally; the congress was outside it's legal authority establishing it. (See Art 1 Sec 8, Amd 1, Amd 9, and Amd 10)
#2) Corporations are not natural people. They exist only in the legal fiction (laws) created by the State. Without s State, you can not have a corporation. So you can see your post does not make much sense to us Anarchists.
#3) Businesses does not force you to do things at the barrel of a gun. Governments do. Businesses that do, are government. It's obvious which one you stand more to lose to...
#4) Man has not 'flocked' to government. He has been forced into it by other men. I don't see any of us having much of a choice, now do we? (Also Historically the minimal and governmentless societies have been the most peaceful. (IE Celts vs Romans)
#5) Anarchism is not justified by the ideal that men are basically good. It is justified that men are bascially evil, and it is exactly those men that should not have priviledge over other men. (In plain english. It's those same scumbags that make up the govenment...only a HIGHER percentage)
#6) It is time for the aristocracy (governments) of the world to step aside and let men live free. They do nothing for you, only to you. Only the 'house nigger mentality' can justify otherwise.
People need to seriously start considering the health risks of living with constant high frequency RF. As an EE/CE, I don't feel very comfortable talking on cell phones a long time. I sure as hell don't want tons of 2.4GHz traffic beaming through my house. (BTW that's about the same wave length as a microwave oven)
You ever try Solaris? It's flithy and lacks many of the features of linux. (Debian GNU/Linux anyway)
I tend to agree here. Women do not have a mind for engineering. It's a biological fact.