i agree that there may be some level of damage done with radiation, simply because... its radiation, it doesnt sound like something you would want on the list of ingredients in your food. but the point isnt so much whether it does damage, or even the extent of the damage (which seems much more important than the over all argument of yes or no, radiation?) but instead, is it worth the damage? sure it might emit radiation, which might be bad, but come on, its free wi fi! how can some radiation be compared to the possabilities made available with free wifi acces? if they really have any beef with it, well, they also make u sit in classes all day, which isnt what our bodies naturally want or need. but its the point of what we do sitting in the chairs all day that makes it worth the cost (usually) and so shouldnt the use fullness of wifi negate those "possible" side effects?
Slashdot Mirror
i agree that there may be some level of damage done with radiation, simply because... its radiation, it doesnt sound like something you would want on the list of ingredients in your food. but the point isnt so much whether it does damage, or even the extent of the damage (which seems much more important than the over all argument of yes or no, radiation?) but instead, is it worth the damage? sure it might emit radiation, which might be bad, but come on, its free wi fi! how can some radiation be compared to the possabilities made available with free wifi acces? if they really have any beef with it, well, they also make u sit in classes all day, which isnt what our bodies naturally want or need. but its the point of what we do sitting in the chairs all day that makes it worth the cost (usually) and so shouldnt the use fullness of wifi negate those "possible" side effects?