Anti-Muslim violence in Central Africa[edit]
Further information: Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration
After the predominantly Muslim Seleka militia took control of the Central African Republic under President Michel Djotodia in 2013, a period of lawlessness and sectarian violence continued. Following warnings of "genocide" by the UN and a controversial intervention force by MISCA, Djotodia resigned. Despite neutral Catherine Samba-Panza being made president, the Anti-balaka Christian militants continued sectarian violence, including reported targeted killings, against Muslim civilians.[21]
so, standing up to islamist extremists is now a sign of christian terrorism??? in what world???
what people dont like to talk about in the crusades, it was the christians fighting the muslims. which came first though the christian brutality or the muslim brutality? (in regards to the crusades)
show me one islam ran country that is not out there oppressing their women and minorities, other religions. so me one islamic country that has basic rights. If one exists, i dont know of it
Clearly these gunmen were victims, and we should not judge them for their actions. They should be rewarded for standing up against the big bad papers for printing cartoons.
trillions??? gimme citations on all subsidies (meaning actual dollars given to companies, not simply letting them keep more of their own money) equaling trillions for fiscal year 2013, or any year... Ill wait....
also quite possible. Im no seismic expert by any means. im only going on the limited knowledge I do have that show smaller earthquakes tend to keep bigger ones away
as for the water issue, i dont know enough to weigh in on that. as for the seismic activity, are not a few smaller quakes much better than the large one that will be coming??
well, gases is cheaper because the middle east is dropping prices to put the american frackers out of business. so.... yeah, take what you will from that
I could have sworn that the video of burning sink water was proven to be a fake. not in the sense that it didnt actually happen, but on the basis that it had nothing to do with fracking??
appeasement clearly has not worked. sometimes hard actions need to be taken
what you are leaving out is the people they were killing were the muslims who had just got done killing their people and taking over their land....
the muslims were the other side of the crusades
Anti-Muslim violence in Central Africa[edit] Further information: Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration After the predominantly Muslim Seleka militia took control of the Central African Republic under President Michel Djotodia in 2013, a period of lawlessness and sectarian violence continued. Following warnings of "genocide" by the UN and a controversial intervention force by MISCA, Djotodia resigned. Despite neutral Catherine Samba-Panza being made president, the Anti-balaka Christian militants continued sectarian violence, including reported targeted killings, against Muslim civilians.[21]
so, standing up to islamist extremists is now a sign of christian terrorism??? in what world???
what people dont like to talk about in the crusades, it was the christians fighting the muslims. which came first though the christian brutality or the muslim brutality? (in regards to the crusades)
show me one islam ran country that is not out there oppressing their women and minorities, other religions. so me one islamic country that has basic rights. If one exists, i dont know of it
we are not worried about what happened centuries ago
How many people were killed in the name of Christianity in the past 100 years? last 50? Last 10???
Clearly these gunmen were victims, and we should not judge them for their actions. They should be rewarded for standing up against the big bad papers for printing cartoons.
will be funny when they get there and its 72 little boys
also, why would anyone want 72 virgins???? gimme some women who know what they are doing!
the religion of peace....
I dont disagree with you in reality. then again im about 2 weeks away from supporting violent revolution lol
oh for the vast majority i agree with you. I was only speaking on laptops
I don't consider allowing people to shit on our environment permissible. It's not their money, it's our money
Correct. It is OUR money. NOT the governments.
the flaming water has been called out as a hoax
but are we not trying to do everything we can environmentally for the future?
the only idiot here seems to be you. no substance, only insults
I dont consider allowing people to keep their own money, giving them money. only in "we need more money!!!" politics does that count
The FBI doesnt get to make that decision, A Judge or congress will
no because as soon as they do, the prices will be right back in the 100$ a barrel
trillions??? gimme citations on all subsidies (meaning actual dollars given to companies, not simply letting them keep more of their own money) equaling trillions for fiscal year 2013, or any year... Ill wait....
also quite possible. Im no seismic expert by any means. im only going on the limited knowledge I do have that show smaller earthquakes tend to keep bigger ones away
as for the water issue, i dont know enough to weigh in on that. as for the seismic activity, are not a few smaller quakes much better than the large one that will be coming??
well, gases is cheaper because the middle east is dropping prices to put the american frackers out of business. so.... yeah, take what you will from that
what if causing a number of small earthquakes prolongs the release of a large one. Less energy is being pent up so the slippage should do less damage
I could have sworn that the video of burning sink water was proven to be a fake. not in the sense that it didnt actually happen, but on the basis that it had nothing to do with fracking??