Slashdot Mirror


User: ganjadude

ganjadude's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,568
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,568

  1. also, still havent explained HOW shes gonna do any of the talking points you posted.... ill wait

  2. except for hes done nothing but shit on the constitution since hes been in office......

    nice to see you ignore everything else that i had to correct on your post however. typical clinton supporter, head buried in the sand

  3. Re:In the last ten years or so, green has gone nuk on Global CO2 Concentration Passes Threshold of 400 ppm -- and That's Bad for the Climate (time.com) · · Score: 1

    and this is true, but saying anti nuke is the same as global warming denier is simply incorrect. maybe the people at the top, but many of the morons on the street never got the memo

  4. ok so now that you have pushed out the talking points. explain HOW shes going to do any of that????

    - Strengthening the Affordable Care Acts is to the benefit of the American people.

    you mean the program that was pushed down our throats and has NEVER worked, costs for most on it are rising an avg of 22% this year alone, insurance companies leaving the exchanges.... that ACA??? So tell me HOW shes gonna fix it, not just that she will

    - Increasing taxes on the very wealthy to close the deficit is to the benefit of the American people.

    her plan will bring in less revenue and hurt the middle class and poor even more than you thing because things dont work that way. its a great talking point but you raise the money on the "rich" (which include farm owners and small business owners" and costs rise and business closes. but yes, those mean rich people that hillary is getting all her money from are simply going to give more money to the government. heres an idea, instead of spending a billion on her campaign, why not give it to the treasury???

    - Strengthened bank legislation is to the benefit of the American people.

    thats not what it seems like based on her talks with wallstreet, but you go on and believe that

    - Sensible gun control legislation is to the benefit of the American people.

    we already have sensible gun control, its called the 2nd amendment. the president really has no constitutional say on guns that is a decision for congress, to pull a constitutional convention and get 3/4ths of the states to agree to ammend the constitution....do you REALLY think congress is gonna do that??? no - so no she wont be doing anything with guns, just like obama

    - Wider access to women's health care (including abortion) is to the benefit of the American people.

    really? and how do you propose that? by taking more of our money to give to special interest groups??? how is that better for america? if someone wants an abortion fine! but me and you should not pay for it. just like we shouldnt pay for penis pills and birth control, thats NOT what a government is supposed to do

    - Appointing non-right-wing Supreme Court justices is to the benefit of the American people.

    LOL yes just what we need more justices who think its ok to take more and more of our rights away. The correct Justice to put on the bench is one who is a constitutional scholar. anything less is a disservice to america

    - Supporting LGBT rights it to the benefit of the American people.

    really? because you would be shocked to find out trump is a bigger friend to the gay community than hillary ever has been. shes only come out publicly in support of the LGBT community recently because she thinks its beneficial to her campaign. go over her career, shes been anti LGBT for 90% of it and look at trump who has no history of being anti LGBT

    the mental gymnastics you must go through to believe the garbage that she spews is disgusting

  5. no most things have not been proven to be fakes. in fact the corruption just seems to get worse

    notice how she never claims the wikileaks dumps are fakes, just deflects responding and blames russia (with no real proof), potentially inciting ww3????

  6. as has been noted time and time and again the energy is not there in solar or wind to replace everything else *at this point in time*

  7. Anti-nuclear power = Climate Change Denier.

    that may have been true in the past, but not for many many years. its the environmentalists, the global warming supporters who are the ones who have been anti nuke since the 70s

  8. Re:horse has left the barn on Global CO2 Concentration Passes Threshold of 400 ppm -- and That's Bad for the Climate (time.com) · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    no because spending billions even trillions to build such a machine is not a good use of money for those of us who, you know are alive....now

  9. Re:Sea level rise isn't the main problem on Global CO2 Concentration Passes Threshold of 400 ppm -- and That's Bad for the Climate (time.com) · · Score: 1

    thats why im buying land inland so it will be beachfront in a few decades!!!

  10. Re:Queue the world ending in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... on Global CO2 Concentration Passes Threshold of 400 ppm -- and That's Bad for the Climate (time.com) · · Score: 2

    well, thats because intelligent people come here

  11. Re:Apparently it impacted news trends, not posts on Latest WikiLeaks Reveal Suggests Facebook Is Too Close For Comfort With Clinton (hothardware.com) · · Score: 1

    so they are playing games. I get nothing but pro clinton and bernie stuff on my wall when i cant stand either of them

  12. effective at what exactly and to whos benefit? not the american people thats for sure

  13. Re:In Soviet Russia on Latest WikiLeaks Reveal Suggests Facebook Is Too Close For Comfort With Clinton (hothardware.com) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    none of the things he has *said* are worse than the things she has *done* is the issue

  14. their news programming (all day until 5) is news proper. from 5 PM on its opinion. same holds true with cnn but for the other guys.

  15. Re: Watches are worn as bling on No One Is Buying Smartwatches Anymore (gizmodo.com) · · Score: 1

    exactly. I got mine with my S7 when i got that in april free as well and its something that i would not buy, but its nice when its a gift. it does spend more time sitting on its charger than on my wrist however after a month and a half. to be fair, i wasnt a watch guy prior to it so i think its more i dont like stuff (jewelry, watches arm bands etc) on me

  16. Re:What is this FB you keep railing on about? on PayPal Payments and Notifications Are Coming To Facebook Messenger (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 1

    yeah but.... no glitter tag!!!!

  17. and with paypal behind it you KNOW it will be bad. Irecall a time i sold something that took 2 days longer than expected to get there so the customer complained and got their moneyback. 2 days later when it showed up fine no problem got the money back on my acct. well minus the 10 dollars in paypal fees that never should have been applied in the first place. they would hear none of it. Id have better luck working with big banks than paypal trying to get my money back

  18. Re: well, of course there will be less females. on Women in Computing To Decline To 22% by 2025, Study Warns (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    woah woah woah, we dont get to decide that. we shouldnt define AI with outdated pronouns!!!!

  19. Re:"if nothing is done to encourage more of them t on Women in Computing To Decline To 22% by 2025, Study Warns (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    why is it a "problem" to you? This is america, not china, we let our kids do what they want and be what they want here

  20. Re: gloves? on New Smart Guns Will Have Fingerprint Readers (computerworld.com) · · Score: 1

    you are correct, I was using the term in the traditional sense. Im all for a constitutional convention, get 3/4ths of the states to agree. anything else is as i said NOT up for negotiation

  21. Re:The problem with 'smart' guns on New Smart Guns Will Have Fingerprint Readers (computerworld.com) · · Score: 1

    it only has to happen once, thats the point

  22. Re:Supply and Demand - where is the demand? on New Smart Guns Will Have Fingerprint Readers (computerworld.com) · · Score: 1

    the problems are however being missed. NJ tried to pass a law which said after this type of gun is on the market, all other guns are illegal after 3 years.

    nots not that we dont want you to have this kind of gun if you want, its because we dont want this to be the only kind of gun we are allowed to buy

  23. Re: gloves? on New Smart Guns Will Have Fingerprint Readers (computerworld.com) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you are right. there is no negotiation. "shall not infringe" is pretty clear

  24. Re:I'm a socialist on New Smart Guns Will Have Fingerprint Readers (computerworld.com) · · Score: 2

    thats kind of the point. if someone wants to kill themselves, let them!

  25. Re:I'm a socialist on New Smart Guns Will Have Fingerprint Readers (computerworld.com) · · Score: 2

    The right wing didn't want blacks to have guns.

    false