1.A popular notion, but not correct. WE aren't doing any such thing. Elite Democrats (mostly rich/powerful socialists who just happen to be mostly white) are imposing this stuff as a way to DIVIDE us (us being the non rich non socialists) by race.
I agree with this. It is just a few , but who elected them? and why? Because you whined about them being unlike you. Beyond that who influances them, the same group that owns all the media for North America, and it is the Democrats who started the social engeneering, with there liberal relaxation on the media it allowed it to conquor us so now it shapes and controlls the North american and westren nations. Some of Europe still has a backbone, but not enough to do much lol.
2. They used their control of the media to force whites to accept it by dint of endless, unrebutted by refusing any opposing view airtime/columnspace, charges that anyone opposing them is a bigot.
They were willing to accept the loss of many whites at the ballotbox though. The blacks bought in readily, not realizing the trap and now most live in shattered slums where once stood poor but proud and rising communities. yet you elected them again and were were the pitch forks... this was done by both parties and will continue untill the average joe wakes up and learns about what "will" happen.
Then they subverted the women's sufferage movement and again created a permamant divide with a dependent group voting solid for Democrats. Why Democrat, if every woman who wanted rights when they got the right to vote voted for a woman then they could easily havetaken up a small founding party that by today would have held power for at least a decade. By being too simple minded to think beyond A and B you were divided. Change only comes when it is forced. Not everyone will like the change though
Again with the trade unions, creating a spoils system where the few had great benefits that everyone knew could never be extended universally. Sure unions got rid of sweatshops, but they also got rid of quality and small budding companies the chance to grow. Anyone who joins a union is a sucker!!!!! Why so bold a statement it may and i say may get you a few goodies every few years, but you normally have to threaten to Strike for it and when you do you look for every carrot offered is a tighter bridal either to you the worker or to us the consumer either way it sux. Second what crazy survival of the weakest mentality decided the funding and approaiation of funds with in unions. (oh yeah it was the mobs of the 40's)Any place where a single person can make full wages all the time yet if "they" decide to strike, (they distort much to get it to happen if needed) those who actually walk off only make a TINYportion to try and live through the strike. I say leaders should suffer with the striker and since you won't find a union anywhere that those union guys sharein a strike suffering and make little or nothing during none strike times, i think a union is for a sucker and it's power to force workers to pay who don't want to damn... how pissed will you all be when... sorry if you were forced to join the army, it's much like a union...
3.And the unions made sure everyone knew which switch to pull in the voting booth to stay on the gravy train.
This ones funny last time i checked they may publically sway one way or another byut we allhave secret ballots don't we so they never should really know who voted for who, and once again this goes back to lackof choice, if I were some of the groups who would never vote Republican Who else can I vote for and since all the top is the same and the strings are pulled by the same groups one is no different then the other
4.And it worked for about two generations, the Democratic Party was a majority of minorities. With total control over mass communications and the destruction of public education
Hummmm.. where to begin, darn. Either the media keeps you realy sheltered if you believe that or you have to be kidding. The only control they had was they lost control, now in the 50...60...70 tv was reali
Of course thats what it's all about is watching the common people the agenda is to have us a police state by 2020, big brother is here he's just expanding and the internet is the last fronteer of freedom. It's like the survaliance, the only time you can be sure what your saying is when your face to face and criminals know that few use cell phones and like you said they slang it out ewhen they do. But the sheep don't notice as there privleges are stripped away, there privacy diminished and the social engeneering continues.
Slashdot Mirror
1.A popular notion, but not correct. WE aren't doing any such thing. Elite Democrats (mostly rich/powerful socialists who just happen to be mostly white) are imposing this stuff as a way to DIVIDE us (us being the non rich non socialists) by race. I agree with this. It is just a few , but who elected them? and why? Because you whined about them being unlike you. Beyond that who influances them, the same group that owns all the media for North America, and it is the Democrats who started the social engeneering, with there liberal relaxation on the media it allowed it to conquor us so now it shapes and controlls the North american and westren nations. Some of Europe still has a backbone, but not enough to do much lol. 2. They used their control of the media to force whites to accept it by dint of endless, unrebutted by refusing any opposing view airtime/columnspace, charges that anyone opposing them is a bigot. They were willing to accept the loss of many whites at the ballotbox though. The blacks bought in readily, not realizing the trap and now most live in shattered slums where once stood poor but proud and rising communities. yet you elected them again and were were the pitch forks... this was done by both parties and will continue untill the average joe wakes up and learns about what "will" happen. Then they subverted the women's sufferage movement and again created a permamant divide with a dependent group voting solid for Democrats. Why Democrat, if every woman who wanted rights when they got the right to vote voted for a woman then they could easily havetaken up a small founding party that by today would have held power for at least a decade. By being too simple minded to think beyond A and B you were divided. Change only comes when it is forced. Not everyone will like the change though Again with the trade unions, creating a spoils system where the few had great benefits that everyone knew could never be extended universally. Sure unions got rid of sweatshops, but they also got rid of quality and small budding companies the chance to grow. Anyone who joins a union is a sucker!!!!! Why so bold a statement it may and i say may get you a few goodies every few years, but you normally have to threaten to Strike for it and when you do you look for every carrot offered is a tighter bridal either to you the worker or to us the consumer either way it sux. Second what crazy survival of the weakest mentality decided the funding and approaiation of funds with in unions. (oh yeah it was the mobs of the 40's)Any place where a single person can make full wages all the time yet if "they" decide to strike, (they distort much to get it to happen if needed) those who actually walk off only make a TINYportion to try and live through the strike. I say leaders should suffer with the striker and since you won't find a union anywhere that those union guys sharein a strike suffering and make little or nothing during none strike times, i think a union is for a sucker and it's power to force workers to pay who don't want to damn... how pissed will you all be when... sorry if you were forced to join the army, it's much like a union... 3.And the unions made sure everyone knew which switch to pull in the voting booth to stay on the gravy train. This ones funny last time i checked they may publically sway one way or another byut we allhave secret ballots don't we so they never should really know who voted for who, and once again this goes back to lackof choice, if I were some of the groups who would never vote Republican Who else can I vote for and since all the top is the same and the strings are pulled by the same groups one is no different then the other 4.And it worked for about two generations, the Democratic Party was a majority of minorities. With total control over mass communications and the destruction of public education Hummmm.. where to begin, darn. Either the media keeps you realy sheltered if you believe that or you have to be kidding. The only control they had was they lost control, now in the 50...60...70 tv was reali
Of course thats what it's all about is watching the common people the agenda is to have us a police state by 2020, big brother is here he's just expanding and the internet is the last fronteer of freedom. It's like the survaliance, the only time you can be sure what your saying is when your face to face and criminals know that few use cell phones and like you said they slang it out ewhen they do. But the sheep don't notice as there privleges are stripped away, there privacy diminished and the social engeneering continues.