I'm sure there are few or many ways to encrypt at greater probability to the limit of randomness itself. But what is the point of encrypting something that does not carry equal amount of security with integrity of the encrypted data once unecrypted?
A one-time pad is simply a non-repeating set of truly random characters, essentially a shared-secret between parties. It is entirely unrelated to "security" and/or "integrity" which are different concepts entirely with "security" being a process and "integrity" being the ability to verify that something, whatever it is, hasn't been damaged, tampered with, or otherwise compromised..
Do you believe in DNA encryption?
What does that mean, using 4 states instead of just 2 (binary)?
Slashdot Mirror
Over a year ago, Bush created the "Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board".
poop
Soylent Green is people!
i go poopie
I'm sure there are few or many ways to encrypt at greater probability to the limit of randomness itself. But what is the point of encrypting something that does not carry equal amount of security with integrity of the encrypted data once unecrypted?
A one-time pad is simply a non-repeating set of truly random characters, essentially a shared-secret between parties. It is entirely unrelated to "security" and/or "integrity" which are different concepts entirely with "security" being a process and "integrity" being the ability to verify that something, whatever it is, hasn't been damaged, tampered with, or otherwise compromised..
Do you believe in DNA encryption?
What does that mean, using 4 states instead of just 2 (binary)?