You said "built" which implies in this case historic perspective. Neither Internet nor WWW was "built" on porn. Being a media, not matter what was the original purpose, it is of course immediately used for sharing various sort of crap, be it porn, be it catz, or cute babies (yes, there was a time on the Internet, when cute babies were as popular as cute pets, nowadays of course, a human degraded so much and so suddenly that the only feeling that a human being can feel looking at a picture of a cute baby is a criminal sexual desire to devour the child. O, humanity.).
Cell phones are consumer technology and human-powered businesd technology.
AI is to replace technology.
Tough problem is spreading wealth to the vast amount of unemployable. Spreading in clever way, creating social structures, not just nightmerish dystopian grey blocks for living.
The deaths ate inevitable, they will happen, if every "servant of the people" stupid governor will start acting like this, this will have a tremendous negative impact on the progress.
Given that pedestrian caused this problem, this perfectly illustrates the future.
If the whole dialog from the excerpt I am reading is not in, it will be a contrarevutionary betrayal.
Imagine a dialog of two physicists, not in Pasadena, but one of them is an old physics professor with a huge metal "crown" on his head and a metal door hanging on his neck, arguing about Copenhagen interpretation with his wife, a physicist as well, who succumbed to the Hóng Wèibngs pressure and forced to participate in public humiliation of her husband:
- Ye Zhetai, you cannot deny this charge! You have often lectured students on the reactionary Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.
- It is, after all, the explanation recognized to be most in line with experimental results.
- This explanation posits that external observation leads to the collapse of the quantum wave function. This is another expression of reactionary idealism, and it’s indeed the most brazen expression
- Should philosophy guide experiments, or should experiments guide philosophy?
- Of course it should be the correct philosophy of Marxism that guides scientific experiments!
- Then that’s equivalent to saying that the correct philosophy falls out of the sky. This is against the idea that the truth emerges from experience. It’s counter to the principles of how Marxism seeks to understand nature.
Fantastic. I watch the shit out of this.
We, tech nerds, whine and moaned about Big Bang Theory and nerdfaces.
Here, a series is on the way, where physicists are represented for what they are.
Answer the following question without your typical deceit: Between the years of 1962 and 1965, did you not decide on your own to add relativity to the intro physics course?”
“Relativity is part of the fundamental theories of physics,” Ye answered. “How can a basic survey course not teach it?”
That stupid overuse of "first they came" quote needs to end, and there is a very simple Occam razor for deciding what does this metaphor stand for.
It stands for stuff that matters, not just all kinda crap. It stands for something people are ready to give up their lives for and they did so noticeably historically.
In original quote it was Trade Unionists, Socialists, Jews and Catholics.
At what point overused metaphor loses all meaning? The more you use it, the more people realize the limits of application of it.
You just compared trash to serious ideological movements or simply ethnicity to which many people sacrificied their lives: trade unionists, socialists, Jews.
You are a dumbass, and, unfortunately, your name is Legion.
The poem quote is still applicable today: becausr they, indeed, already came for Muslim bloggers, for example, or people like James Damore.
I'd like to see the math: how tariffs work in the past: how much did they result in additonal tax, as you said, and how much did they affect new jobs in the country
Slashdot Mirror
You said "built" which implies in this case historic perspective. Neither Internet nor WWW was "built" on porn. Being a media, not matter what was the original purpose, it is of course immediately used for sharing various sort of crap, be it porn, be it catz, or cute babies (yes, there was a time on the Internet, when cute babies were as popular as cute pets, nowadays of course, a human degraded so much and so suddenly that the only feeling that a human being can feel looking at a picture of a cute baby is a criminal sexual desire to devour the child. O, humanity.).
"Used a lot for" != "built".
UK and Germany. Look at the Pokemon el-Catalonia.
No it's not, September child.
They are all liberals, they are all demagogues.
You think I give two shits about distinction between stupid democrats and stupid republicans?
Industrial revolution allowed to being MORE people to labor - women and children.
AI will eliminate that - it's the opposite direction.
Cell phones are consumer technology and human-powered businesd technology.
AI is to replace technology.
Tough problem is spreading wealth to the vast amount of unemployable. Spreading in clever way, creating social structures, not just nightmerish dystopian grey blocks for living.
By liberals.
This will have a chilling effect on SDC progress.
The deaths ate inevitable, they will happen, if every "servant of the people" stupid governor will start acting like this, this will have a tremendous negative impact on the progress.
Given that pedestrian caused this problem, this perfectly illustrates the future.
If the whole dialog from the excerpt I am reading is not in, it will be a contrarevutionary betrayal.
Imagine a dialog of two physicists, not in Pasadena, but one of them is an old physics professor with a huge metal "crown" on his head and a metal door hanging on his neck, arguing about Copenhagen interpretation with his wife, a physicist as well, who succumbed to the Hóng Wèibngs pressure and forced to participate in public humiliation of her husband:
- Ye Zhetai, you cannot deny this charge! You have often lectured students on the reactionary Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.
- It is, after all, the explanation recognized to be most in line with experimental results.
- This explanation posits that external observation leads to the collapse of the quantum wave function. This is another expression of reactionary idealism, and it’s indeed the most brazen expression
- Should philosophy guide experiments, or should experiments guide philosophy?
- Of course it should be the correct philosophy of Marxism that guides scientific experiments!
- Then that’s equivalent to saying that the correct philosophy falls out of the sky. This is against the idea that the truth emerges from experience. It’s counter to the principles of how Marxism seeks to understand nature.
Fantastic. I watch the shit out of this.
We, tech nerds, whine and moaned about Big Bang Theory and nerdfaces.
Here, a series is on the way, where physicists are represented for what they are.
What stopped you each time?
That stupid overuse of "first they came" quote needs to end, and there is a very simple Occam razor for deciding what does this metaphor stand for.
It stands for stuff that matters, not just all kinda crap. It stands for something people are ready to give up their lives for and they did so noticeably historically.
In original quote it was Trade Unionists, Socialists, Jews and Catholics.
At what point overused metaphor loses all meaning? The more you use it, the more people realize the limits of application of it.
You just compared trash to serious ideological movements or simply ethnicity to which many people sacrificied their lives: trade unionists, socialists, Jews.
You are a dumbass, and, unfortunately, your name is Legion.
The poem quote is still applicable today: becausr they, indeed, already came for Muslim bloggers, for example, or people like James Damore.
lipstick on a pig
> However, since his assists are probably entirely gone, It's probably doubtful that he could mount a meaningful appeal
That's what the RIAA mafia should always do! Seize the property right away - no appeals!
How screwed up the legal system is when people without lawyers have no chance of winning.
The logs on ANY car should not belong to the owner of the ar. It's not an iPhone, its a 4000 pounds killing machine.
Tesla is way above other EVa on US market by mileage alone.
>Having "investors" scrutinize everything I do would be the worst nightmare and the last option I'd ever consider if I started a company
People have a billion (or two) reasons to give up control.
reminded me of this clip:
https://youtu.be/VDJehCXMKwI?t...
My objection is to the liberal usage of the year 2050.
Are you... me? It became spooky when you mentioned playthroughs.
The idea is that the grandfather will buy a Samsung made in Korea instead of Apple made in China.
I'd like to see the math: how tariffs work in the past: how much did they result in additonal tax, as you said, and how much did they affect new jobs in the country
What if you replace bitcoin in the quotebite with "blockchain based currency"?
The immediate problem with this prediction arises when you remember that COBOL is still number one language in banking world.
In other words, banking is very conservative in terms of operation technology.
I wish it was THAT conservative in terms of what they do with the money.
Appr. quote:
We tend overestimate things that will happen in 2 years, and underestimate things that will happen in 10 years.
Despite bumper sticker nature of that quote, it's a food for thought.