Are you kidding me, that article though correct in some cases is very false in others:
Examples:
"In addition, ASP.NET requires separate code and HTML files; HTML can not be directly included in code."
Uh, no. You have the option.
"If.Net's "the future" why haven't the major applications, like Microsoft Office and Exchange, been rewritten on the.Net platform?"
The web outlook offered with exchange 2003 is written in completely in.NET.
That article is a joke.
Slashdot Mirror
LOL, facts.... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/303247/EN-US/ Thats funny, there is code in one file, and in two files just like I said, obviously you know what you're talking about. Really no client apps? http://blogs.msdn.com/vsdata/archive/2004/11/01/25 0823.aspx
Hey, you know what keep believing everything you read and being a misinformed fool.
Are you kidding me, that article though correct in some cases is very false in others: Examples: "In addition, ASP.NET requires separate code and HTML files; HTML can not be directly included in code." Uh, no. You have the option. "If .Net's "the future" why haven't the major applications, like Microsoft Office and Exchange, been rewritten on the .Net platform?"
The web outlook offered with exchange 2003 is written in completely in .NET.
That article is a joke.
Why is MS SQL and .NET stupid? I can somewhat understand MS SQl but why .NET? You can use mono...