Six years with the company goes way beyond a standard independent contractor gig. He'll be lucky if the Inland Revenue don't invite him to hand over far more than he picks up from the company.
Thing is, if Steam ban me I take them to court for the replacement cost of the games.
My worse case scenario is that I have to buy the ones I still want to play again. At current prices I could replace all 750 games for a few thousand quid, so a few hundred will get me any that I fancy playing. It's not so much in the greater scheme of things.
The one thing I sure as fuck couldn't do is replace them on GOG, as GOG just don't fucking sell many of them.
I was relatively late to Steam because I was buying games at shops. I even returned two games because they wouldn't work without Steam.
Eventually it became sufficiently ubiquitous that I couldn't avoid it, and then it became substantially easier to buy on Steam, and then they started doing sales that made it cheaper too. Add in the collapse of high street PC games sales, the options on other platforms that provide Steam keys and the massively increased number of games released that make it easy to defer purchases until prices drop and I'm spending the same on games that I was 20 years ago and getting ten times as many games a year.
Upgrading your source of entertainment once a decade is not unreasonable at all.
When I can read the 120 year old book I have downstairs, or play the 40 year old board game I own, or create a complex dynamic multiplayer experience using the same equipment I used 35 years ago (i.e. jumpers for goalposts) then yes, I think being forced to upgrade every decade is very unreasonable.
Actually, the inverse. Eventually your car gets so old the Government designate it 'classic' and admit it's not worth the effort to keep it roadworthy, so skip the checks and drive it anyway.
IQ testing isn't terribly useful. For instance a highly intelligent person that hasn't had access to education will score worse than someone like yourself that has.
Slashdot Mirror
Six years with the company goes way beyond a standard independent contractor gig. He'll be lucky if the Inland Revenue don't invite him to hand over far more than he picks up from the company.
They're not just 'not supporting' it, they're explicitly removing the ability to run purchased software on it.
Are you really so fucked in the head that you can't comprehend the difference, or are you just being a twat?
My Steam library covers games from the past couple of decades though, so it would be erroneous to pretend they're all 'modern'.
Oh no! So I can only use TLS with applications that need TLS?
I can see why you say it's not supported.
Nobody has burst into my house and removed key elements that prevent it from working.
20 years from now Dwarf Fortress might have reached beta.
You may like to explore the Steam 'family sharing' feature.
Show you? Shit, I don't have the source code any more.
Yes, we were writing root kits in the early 90s. Hell, the university encouraged it.
Company of Heroes was released DRM free. I first played it via, lets call them less commercial channels.
I've since bought the game and its expansion packs four times, for myself and for others. But the game itself will probably run sans steam.
I own IT equipment from the 60s and it provides me with pleasure even now.
Wait, that sounds entirely wrong. But my point stands.
Thing is, if Steam ban me I take them to court for the replacement cost of the games.
My worse case scenario is that I have to buy the ones I still want to play again. At current prices I could replace all 750 games for a few thousand quid, so a few hundred will get me any that I fancy playing. It's not so much in the greater scheme of things.
The one thing I sure as fuck couldn't do is replace them on GOG, as GOG just don't fucking sell many of them.
XP and Vista just do not support modern day TLS encryption
Sorry but this is utter bollocks.
Jesus, showing your age there. One DVD has the capacity to hold every game I bought for over a decade.
I used to get ten games on a single cassette.
I was relatively late to Steam because I was buying games at shops. I even returned two games because they wouldn't work without Steam.
Eventually it became sufficiently ubiquitous that I couldn't avoid it, and then it became substantially easier to buy on Steam, and then they started doing sales that made it cheaper too. Add in the collapse of high street PC games sales, the options on other platforms that provide Steam keys and the massively increased number of games released that make it easy to defer purchases until prices drop and I'm spending the same on games that I was 20 years ago and getting ten times as many games a year.
Hmm. If you're relying on that and haven't checked in a while, you may want to create some backups on more modern media.
Floppies suffer bitrot.
Ok, I have the latest client, and I have the OS the game tells me it requires. I'll just install the latest client on that OS and.. oh.
Refund please.
Upgrading your source of entertainment once a decade is not unreasonable at all.
When I can read the 120 year old book I have downstairs, or play the 40 year old board game I own, or create a complex dynamic multiplayer experience using the same equipment I used 35 years ago (i.e. jumpers for goalposts) then yes, I think being forced to upgrade every decade is very unreasonable.
No, chances are less than a third of my purchased games work on Linux.
Also, why should I bother to install Linux when I already have Win 98SE installed?
You are not helping.
Actually, the inverse. Eventually your car gets so old the Government designate it 'classic' and admit it's not worth the effort to keep it roadworthy, so skip the checks and drive it anyway.
https://www.gov.uk/historic-ve...
Considering XP is incapable of using TLS 1.1 or better
wtf? What the hell stops XP using TLS1.1?
Yeah, there's only a 72.9% chance you could fail to be drawn three times, it's clearly a biased algorithm working against you.
You're disturbed all right.
IQ testing isn't terribly useful. For instance a highly intelligent person that hasn't had access to education will score worse than someone like yourself that has.
Pence is far too much of a closet case homosexual
Being a happily married man faithful to his wife makes him a closet homosexual?
Let me guess, you invite other men in for a threesome then complain if your wife gets all the cock.
You'd rather revert to serfdom and be unable to leave the land you were born on?
A lot of online activity is creative and/or interactive. I think that makes it much better for the people involved.
It's also often social, which is substantially better than watching TV alone.