Nobody is forcing you to believe anything on hear-say. Why don't just try it out and add some weight to your Office bashing?
P.S: Please don't tell you're sick of already trying out the all the previous versions and why should this version of Office be better. It just may be.
To place Google in context, Mr. Kraus offered a brief history lesson. In the 1990's, he said, I.B.M. was widely perceived in Silicon Valley as a "gentle giant" that was easy to partner with while Microsoft was perceived as an "extraordinarily fearsome, competitive company wanting to be in as many businesses as possible and with the engineering talent capable of implementing effectively anything."
Now, in the view of Mr. Kraus, "Microsoft is becoming I.B.M. and Google is becoming Microsoft." Mr. Kraus is the chief executive and a founder of JotSpot, a Silicon Valley start-up hoping to sell blogging and other self-publishing tools to corporations.
Why did the submitter think an article that was created on July of 2006 fresh enough to be posted on a forum which is News for nerds.
An article that old is hardly news.
You could do all that or just measure the costs incurred maintaining that vehicle in terms of $/mile or miles/$. This makes details of the fuel used irrelevant. This way most economic car would be the one that gives more miles per buck. And yeah we could keep all the pollution norms in place to make sure that the new type of fuel would be easy on environment.
Slashdot Mirror
85% and 20%? Actual figures? ;-)
You just proved that 90% of the statistics are just pulled out of one's ass.
Nobody is forcing you to believe anything on hear-say. Why don't just try it out and add some weight to your Office bashing?
P.S: Please don't tell you're sick of already trying out the all the previous versions and why should this version of Office be better. It just may be.
Aha!!! That explains its blazing speed!!
Here's the juicy excerpt from the article:
200 updates on an SP0 machine? You never know. 'cos Microsoft stopped supplying updates to the computer with SP0. It must be running at least SP1.
Sorry!! Actually I wanted to show this!! and btw I found out there are programmers who di hate Bill Gates
OMG!! PONIES!!!
Why did the submitter think an article that was created on July of 2006 fresh enough to be posted on a forum which is News for nerds. An article that old is hardly news.
You could do all that or just measure the costs incurred maintaining that vehicle in terms of $/mile or miles/$. This makes details of the fuel used irrelevant. This way most economic car would be the one that gives more miles per buck. And yeah we could keep all the pollution norms in place to make sure that the new type of fuel would be easy on environment.