So, would it be fair to say that the US has the worst of the available scenarios? We have enough (too many?) guns easily available to the criminal element and not enough guns in the hands of the law-and-order civilians?
The Chicago & DC solutions are unrealistic because guns are easily available a few hundred yards outside of the "illegal" area.
It sounds like the extremes would work out better. No/few guns available OR everyone walking around armed. Thoughts?
VM
Slashdot Mirror
So, would it be fair to say that the US has the worst of the available scenarios? We have enough (too many?) guns easily available to the criminal element and not enough guns in the hands of the law-and-order civilians? The Chicago & DC solutions are unrealistic because guns are easily available a few hundred yards outside of the "illegal" area. It sounds like the extremes would work out better. No/few guns available OR everyone walking around armed. Thoughts? VM