Slashdot Mirror


User: LynnwoodRooster

LynnwoodRooster's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,294
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,294

  1. Re:What he took away is more precious than given on Steve Jobs Dead At 56 · · Score: 1

    It's already withering... iOS is steadily losing marketshare. Sure, they're selling more and more iPhones and iPads each quarter, but that's because the market as a whole is growing faster than their loss of marketshare. It's already on a downslope, just masked by the general market as a whole. iOS devices will end up like Macs - relegated to a small, single-digit share of market, basically irrelevant to the industry as a whole. They had a good run with media players until that market was subsumed by cell phones, and are now watching the cellphone market go away from them as well... It will be interesting to see what they move to next.

  2. Re:Global warming on Severe Arctic Ozone Loss · · Score: 1

    The record says otherwise, unless you limit your timeframe to, say, 800 years or so...

  3. Re:Stop crying on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    Do I have the option for a trial with al-Qaeda? He did with the US - and chose to flee and cede his rights.

  4. Re:Stop crying on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    We are not better than them if we execute people without trial. We are then exactly the same as them.

    Our Justice Department went over it, and concluded that it was legal to do so. A trial not needed. Still doesn't change the fact that if he surrendered, he would have received a trial.

    I wonder if you could "surrender" to Al Qaeda and get a trial, or if they'd have their legal team debate and research if it's legal and ethical to execute you...

  5. Sure, just for the first few months... on Amazon To Lose $10 Per Kindle Fire · · Score: 1

    At the rate that electronics components drop in price, it'll only be a "loss leader" for a few months at most. After that, it'll be a break even or small profit-maker on its own - regardless of the amount of content consumed.

  6. Re:War /= civil process. on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 0

    Yes, we are all clear that you want more people murdered by police for any reason they like. In your mind it is fine to trade all liberty for the pretense of safety even as the total number of those killed increases, and the killers inevitably escape justice because they are police and not evil, evil terrorists.

    When you had no logical position to put forward, you made up a strawman and attacked that. Thanks for showing you have no point other than "USA = teh debbil!".

  7. Re:I live in China, and solved this a while ago on Ask Slashdot: Trustworthy Proxy Services? · · Score: 1

    Hate to tell you, ANY Proxy service that is US based or uses a US-based IP will gladly work with the US Government regarding your privacy. Now, you can have an EU-based proxy - but that's not going to help the original poster when streaming US services like Pandora, Hulu, and Netflix. You have to use a proxy based in the US to stream those services.

  8. Re:War /= civil process. on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    By your own numbers, the police are 1/15th as bad as the terrorists. Additionally, how many of those killed by the police had outstanding arrest warrants - basically Court ordered actions to capture? Now how many of those murdered on September 11th, 2001 had Court ordered executions or even arrest warrants?

  9. President Obama? on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    Interesting... When such actions were taken when President Bush was in office, /. was rife with "Bush is teh debbil!" type screaming. Now that it's President Obama calling the shots, the opposition is now genericized to "USA bad"...

  10. Re:Stop crying on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    We're supposed to be better than them. Otherwise you might as well just have a military dictatorship where the General can kill whoever he wants at any time.

    We are better than them. He could have surrendered at any time and then would have had his day in court. Now you go over there and tell your local Al Qaeda cell leader that you're an American - you'll probably end up like Daniel Pearl - no trial, no jury of peers, no court. Just a knife or - if they're feeling merciful - a bullet.

  11. Re:Other Countries Can Do This Too, You Know... on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    If Iran decides that someone in our country is an enemy and kills him, then Iran has committed an act of war against us. So if the US kills an enemy, the US has committed an act of war against them.

    However, in this case the country of Yemen gave us permission to carry out the attack - we're not at war with them since it was done with their blessing.

  12. Re:Let's get a couple things straight, here. on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    All your arguments hinge on a very strong assumption (which is unfortunately commonly claimed by Bush, Bush2.0 and followers)

    Don't forget President Obama in that little list...

  13. Re:Name the only candidate that would stop this.. on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    These people are not now, and never were an existential threat to this country. There is not now, and never has been, any real justification for declaring a ridiculous, unending global war against these insignificant mosquitos on the ass of world culture, who can barely get a plot together, and 90% of the time seem to need FBI help to find their way out of a paper bag.

    Tell that to the families of 2,977 people murdered on September 11, 2001. Heck, since they're so insignificant, go ahead and send your parents or siblings over to the wilds of Afghanistan or Yemen to have a chat. When they're beheaded like Daniel Pearl it won't mean jack shit because they're insignificant, and it's only a few people, well below the thousands killed earlier that you claim are irrelevant.

  14. Re:War /= civil process. on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    No formal declaration of war: Check.

    OK, let's get pedantic and say that since Congress didn't state an exact set of words you'd like to see, it hasn't declared war (we'll ignore the authorization and funding of all these operations as being an implicit - and financially explicit - declaration).

    Where in the Constitution is the Air Force? Doesn't exist. Hence the Air Force is not part of the military, so using Air Force drones to kill isn't an actual military action. It's not war, it's not military, it's espionage.

  15. Re:War /= civil process. on Drone Kills Top Al Qaeda Figure · · Score: 1

    In 2001, 2977 people were murdered by terrorists. It'll take the police 15 years to "catch up" to make your little trite attempt at comparison worthwhile...

  16. Re:This attitude makes me sick and I'm tired of it on Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Destroy Hard Drives? · · Score: 1

    If you can't hit it and split it with the first attempt, then you really suck at splitting wood, and need much more practice. Single stroke, single HDD shattered and destroyed (or 16" round split in half). Of course, this is /. where 8 hours of heavy mouse use constitutes a long work out period...

  17. Re:90% - really? on Social Media Bubble Pops Before It Fully Inflates · · Score: 1

    Net income - I do not think you know what that means...

  18. I live in China, and solved this a while ago on Ask Slashdot: Trustworthy Proxy Services? · · Score: 2

    Strong VPN. Great service, fast VPNs, lots of VPN options, and streams just about anything everywhere. Punches through the Great Firewall of China (here in Shanghai and elsewhere throughout China) with ease. Pretty cheap, too - worth it to get my fix of Pandora, Hulu, and Netflix!

  19. Re:This attitude makes me sick and I'm tired of it on Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Destroy Hard Drives? · · Score: 1

    In five minutes you'll be able to smash about two of them. Smashing hard drives isn't easy.

    Huh - seems to take but 3 seconds to heft up the 20 pound splitting maul and bring it down with sufficient force to turn the drive into lots of small bits...

  20. 90% - really? on Social Media Bubble Pops Before It Fully Inflates · · Score: 3, Informative
    From Zynga's most recent SEC filing:

    .
    For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, our revenue increased from $231.0 million to $522.0 million, our bookings increased from $373.0 million to $561.3 million, our net income decreased from $20.4 million to $18.1 million and our adjusted EBITDA decreased from $187.3 million to $177.3 million.

    It looks like net income dropped 10% (to 90% of what it was), and EBITDA dropped by about 5%.

    How that translates to a 90% loss in profits I'm not quite sure... Seems like it's a drop TO 90% of what it's profits were - a 10% reduction, not a 90% reduction.

  21. Re:Saxton Hale on Are Folding Containers the Future of Shipping? · · Score: 2

    No, I thought of Zaxxon. God I feel old...

  22. Re:one other reason on Apple Too Big For the Dow Jones Industrial Average · · Score: 1

    It happens rather often, however, especially with small cap stocks. I've stumbled across companies a few times worth less than their balance sheet.

  23. Re:one other reason on Apple Too Big For the Dow Jones Industrial Average · · Score: 1

    With that logic, Microsoft should be worth around $520 billion, given their $52 billion in cash on hand and short term investments...

  24. Re:Tax planning and rich people on White House Proposes "Wealthy Tax" · · Score: 1

    Yeah - you try that. Go ahead. Charges for overseas expenses that are "outside of industry norms" are not allowed, and will not only get you a solid audit but fines and penalties. That's a lot of what Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is disputing right now with the IRS - those kinds of overseas "expenses" that BH claims isn't owned, but the IRS insists is - to the tune of a little more than $1 billion.

  25. Re:Tax planning and rich people on White House Proposes "Wealthy Tax" · · Score: 1

    Nice straw man you set up and attacked there... Now go back and read what I wrote, and if you are actually honest and intelligent and not simply an ideologue you'll realize my statement was directed at the claim about the "rich" making 60% of the income. Which is provably false. If you want to now shift to a different subject (taxation of that income), then at least have the common courtesy to state as much,