Bulldust. They have the truth from the victims and other prosecutors reported no case to answer.
It is clear at this point that the prosecutor is not investigating and is stalling. It has become clear in Sweden. That is why she was sent to London. She has failed in her duties and followed a personal or political agenda.
As to charging him, well, are you asking me to believe that Sweden does not have laws against evading justice? Hell she got an international warrant out on him because he was a "fugitive". Look, you cannot have it both ways. Have you considered the point that you might be wrong?
Yes they have. It is the duty of the pressure to obtain a speedy trial. It is acknowledge by Swedish authorities that her tactics consisted of delay after delay. deliberate delay. Most countries have "acting under the colour of the law" too.
Seeing as she took up the case after all other (and senior) prosecutors said "there was no case to answer" as do the "victims". You really believe she is not in the crap?
Allowing anything to be classified is a dangerous thing. It shields official behaviour from scrutiny.
It is like the encryption debate. There are two sides to the argument and both are absolutes.
If you can trust your government then you can allow it to classify things so that secrets can be kept from enemies.
If you can not trust your government it will hide its bad behaviour behind the classified label.
The person who reveals the former is a traitor.
The person who reveals the latter is a hero.
So, what is revealed has to be considered. If it reveals official egregious offences against the law then the revealing person is a hero and should be praised not censured.
So what we have to ask is wether there was egregious behaviour involved. If yes, a patriot, if no, a traitor.
TL;DR "You pays youse money and you takes youse choice"
Err... No. Catch up. Sweden's own prosecutor's are going to wind up in trouble in Sweden for breaking Sweden's laws.
There was no 'misconduct' in Sweden and neither of the supposed victims feel that there was anything seriously wrong. They both deny there was any rape. It is the prosecutor (with US connections) that laid the rape charges not the supposed victims. The same prosecutor who agreed to let him leave and then charged him as a fugitive.
Can't be done? God does it to thousands every day. Google CAIS. When you have, apologise
FWIW many XY with CAIS are more "female" (although not fertile) than XX women since XX women still produce and use some testosterone but XY with CAIS can use none even if any is produced.
The Swedes give up? I think many there realise they are going to be paying him millions of dollars for acting under the colour of law. The prosecutors have (arguable) broken Swedish law repeatedly. This is now at least partially acknowledged.
Assange has not broken any US laws. He is not a US citizen. His (justified) fear is of getting black-holed. The reasons Assange now offers himself up might be that after all these years of publicity it would be too suspicious if he has a 'heart attack'.
There are no charges for America to bring so there is no way to pardon him from them.
Not only that but Iran will fund transition surgery for its citizens. That is why they say there are no 'gays' in Iran as gays are considered transgender.
Treatable but not curable. Or it would be extinct. It is something you can only catch if exposed as a child but manifests as an adult. Ages old knowledge, medicine may have progressed).
When the 'other' person's feelings are an attempt at exclusion of 'another' person. The 'other' is not denying the 'another' gender but 'another' is denying 'other' their gender. The situations are not equivalent.
I think you are blaming the wrong people. I do not know if it generally true but many of the tg people I know (not in the 3 digits) have a touch of Asperger's and have found many Asperger's (again I know less than 3 digits) pretty understanding of tg/ts issues.
If you had said autistic, I might have agreed, but there are not likely to be many (or any) full blown autistics posting here.
Are you talking about yourself? Because you have demonstrated every characteristic you criticised in the same post that criticised them. You will not call him she because you want to be an asshole. You want to be deliberately rude and annoying. By your self chosen labels and definitions you are deliberately being an arsehole (the right spelling btw).
Yes, truely, it is indeed the Age of the Arsehole. Your Age.
You realise (spelling correct) that you are slagging off at Daniel Webster? You claim to speak English. Unlikely. 'American English' maybe. Cultural appropriation of the worst order, hey? Daniel Webster (tried to) rewrite an entire language. Someone else's language.
No, not really. I would call those states sub-cultures not cultures. I would have to ask an anthropologist to be sure that this is correct though. Me. I am not sure the state, any state, even has the right to ask your sex let alone proclivities. They need numbers for planning but do not need to know that person X is female to not, gay or not, trans or not.
Slashdot Mirror
Bulldust. They have the truth from the victims and other prosecutors reported no case to answer.
It is clear at this point that the prosecutor is not investigating and is stalling. It has become clear in Sweden. That is why she was sent to London. She has failed in her duties and followed a personal or political agenda.
As to charging him, well, are you asking me to believe that Sweden does not have laws against evading justice? Hell she got an international warrant out on him because he was a "fugitive". Look, you cannot have it both ways. Have you considered the point that you might be wrong?
Yes they have. It is the duty of the pressure to obtain a speedy trial. It is acknowledge by Swedish authorities that her tactics consisted of delay after delay. deliberate delay. Most countries have "acting under the colour of the law" too.
Seeing as she took up the case after all other (and senior) prosecutors said "there was no case to answer" as do the "victims". You really believe she is not in the crap?
Difficult to prove
I did. My apologies.
Turns out you not quite are correct. There are a number of cultures with a third gender. Google it. Western civilisation tried to wipe it out.
Do you put tomatoes in a fruit salad?
Allowing anything to be classified is a dangerous thing. It shields official behaviour from scrutiny.
It is like the encryption debate. There are two sides to the argument and both are absolutes.
If you can trust your government then you can allow it to classify things so that secrets can be kept from enemies.
If you can not trust your government it will hide its bad behaviour behind the classified label.
The person who reveals the former is a traitor.
The person who reveals the latter is a hero.
So, what is revealed has to be considered. If it reveals official egregious offences against the law then the revealing person is a hero and should be praised not censured.
So what we have to ask is wether there was egregious behaviour involved. If yes, a patriot, if no, a traitor.
TL;DR "You pays youse money and you takes youse choice"
That could actually be done nowadays.
Err... No. Catch up. Sweden's own prosecutor's are going to wind up in trouble in Sweden for breaking Sweden's laws.
There was no 'misconduct' in Sweden and neither of the supposed victims feel that there was anything seriously wrong. They both deny there was any rape. It is the prosecutor (with US connections) that laid the rape charges not the supposed victims. The same prosecutor who agreed to let him leave and then charged him as a fugitive.
Precisely what would the charges be?/p?
Can't be done? God does it to thousands every day. Google CAIS. When you have, apologise
FWIW many XY with CAIS are more "female" (although not fertile) than XX women since XX women still produce and use some testosterone but XY with CAIS can use none even if any is produced.
The Swedes give up? I think many there realise they are going to be paying him millions of dollars for acting under the colour of law. The prosecutors have (arguable) broken Swedish law repeatedly. This is now at least partially acknowledged.
Could you please advise me of what possible federal or state charges can be brought against Assange?
Not to the Constitution. Chelsea has proved her loyalty to the constitution and the USA. Have you?
Assange has not broken any US laws. He is not a US citizen. His (justified) fear is of getting black-holed. The reasons Assange now offers himself up might be that after all these years of publicity it would be too suspicious if he has a 'heart attack'.
There are no charges for America to bring so there is no way to pardon him from them.
Not only that but Iran will fund transition surgery for its citizens. That is why they say there are no 'gays' in Iran as gays are considered transgender.
Treatable but not curable. Or it would be extinct. It is something you can only catch if exposed as a child but manifests as an adult. Ages old knowledge, medicine may have progressed).
When the 'other' person's feelings are an attempt at exclusion of 'another' person. The 'other' is not denying the 'another' gender but 'another' is denying 'other' their gender. The situations are not equivalent.
God, I hope I didn't met that up.
I think you are blaming the wrong people. I do not know if it generally true but many of the tg people I know (not in the 3 digits) have a touch of Asperger's and have found many Asperger's (again I know less than 3 digits) pretty understanding of tg/ts issues.
If you had said autistic, I might have agreed, but there are not likely to be many (or any) full blown autistics posting here.
Are you talking about yourself? Because you have demonstrated every characteristic you criticised in the same post that criticised them. You will not call him she because you want to be an asshole. You want to be deliberately rude and annoying. By your self chosen labels and definitions you are deliberately being an arsehole (the right spelling btw).
Yes, truely, it is indeed the Age of the Arsehole. Your Age.
No, that could only really apply to those who are gender fluid.
You realise (spelling correct) that you are slagging off at Daniel Webster? You claim to speak English. Unlikely. 'American English' maybe. Cultural appropriation of the worst order, hey? Daniel Webster (tried to) rewrite an entire language. Someone else's language.
You do not have a leg to stand on mate.
When I used the term stat I was using it in the sense of nation state.
No, not really. I would call those states sub-cultures not cultures. I would have to ask an anthropologist to be sure that this is correct though. Me. I am not sure the state, any state, even has the right to ask your sex let alone proclivities. They need numbers for planning but do not need to know that person X is female to not, gay or not, trans or not.
My reaction would be - OOOh! Maybe someone interesting to talk to...