i have used wikipedia to great extent. only witless morons who are not able to notice citation and references the articles are constructed from, talk blabberscrap about wikipedia.
so, because they begged, you are not going to wikipedia. before, you had no issues using the communal resource everyone came together and created, for FREE. however, when they asked you to give a hand for the costs, you have suddenly got irritated.
maybe its good that you are contributing to the effort, by not going.
its as if they are doing this consciously, to break down the patent system by showing how absurd and illogical it is. it is SO extreme that, well, extreme.
rand corporation's consolidation trend report will satisfy i presume. in the end its from the same political spectrum. yet, still an example from banking :
china doesnt obey wto and imf. very probably because these are organizations who are in u.s. mandate, always doing whatever u.s. wants. even in the trade conflict in early 2000s between eu and u.s., they didnt act objectively.
it is easy to become a superpower if you are able to dominate more than half of the world into a dominion, allowing you to use their raw resources cheaply and monopolizingly, and use them as markets to export.
i blame them because i see the pattern on stuff that relate to issues they are 'sensitive' (actually bigoted) about. i mean, even with other zealot types, if you provide enough facts, they do not go medieval. but with these, there is no evading that.
unfortunately it doesnt matter how you convey it. regardless of your language, you will see that if anything you put forth is not compatible with any certain radical party's views (regardless of what the party is), you get trollmodded or reacted in harsh words. out of the blue. this has been such in my experience in the last 1 to 1.5 months. i tried varying approaches to tone and manner, substance and language, yet result is the same.
no surprise though. it is no different in real life. regardless of how politely, nicely, smoothly you put any fact that contradicts a certain biased group's views, there is a certain break point at which they will go medieval. what the tone changes is just the time that that breakpoint comes. in addition, there are some trigger subjects that instantly tick their breakpoint, regardless of what you say.
its because you american right wingers are bigoted psychopaths who cant face truth. when you check my comments, moron, you will notice that all of them had been chain downmodded even if they were giving out FACTUAL information with links and references of information to the wrongdoings of united states, from united states government ITSELF.
bottom line is, you morons cant face the truth. its too much. here, again :
In 1989, the United States invaded Panama as part of Operation Just Cause, which involved 25,000 American troops. Gen. Manuel Noriega, head of government of Panama, had been giving military assistance to Contra groups in Nicaragua at the request of the U.S.—which, in exchange, allowed him to continue his drug-trafficking activities—which they had known about since the 1960s.[12][13] When the DEA tried to indict Noriega in 1971, the CIA prevented them from doing so.[12] The CIA, which was then directed by future president George H. W. Bush, provided Noriega with hundreds of thousands of dollars per year as payment for his work in Latin America.[12] However, when CIA pilot Eugene Hasenfus was shot down over Nicaragua by the Sandinistas, documents aboard the plane revealed many of the CIA's activities in Latin America, and the CIA's connections with Noriega became a public relations "liability" for the U.S. government, which finally allowed the DEA to indict him for drug trafficking, after decades of allowing his drug operations to proceed unchecked.[12] Operation Just Cause, whose ostensible purpose was to capture Noriega, killed numerous Panamanian civilians, but was successful in removing Noriega. The operation pushed Noriega back into the town asylum along with Papal Nuncio where he surrendered to U.S. authorities. His trial took place in Miami, where he was sentenced to 45 years in prison.
i am not implying, stating that the government agencies tasked with their duties are not doing their duties despite there are FAR worse problems on the planet that they are tasked with countering in their own country, but instead they are going after whatever particular private interests want.
i dont think you are able to perceive the scale of this issue. drug trafficking basically is something that causes WARS. or propagates and fuels them. it is that big a problem.
yet you see the agencies tasked with preventing it, doing a few hundred arrests per year for show, but, as you have seen the referenced information, supporting the drug trafficking instead.
what happened ? dumbstruck when faced with the fact that even cia has been running and aiding drug operations ? so you fall back to 'punctuation' and decide my 'lunacy' based on 'first couple of sentences' ?
basically, you are saying that you didnt know shit about these, and i have won the argument.
no fool. hundreds, thousands of dealers, smugglers, are still nothing. for, drug trafficking in the global scale, is something that is able to finance civil wars, operations of secret agencies on the scale like cia did in vietnam, entire countries' repression (afghanistan), endless amount of islamic/radical terror organizations in middle east and globally, and a whole fucking army better equipped than u.s. army, which is currently fighting the mexican army that has been equipped by usa to fight that drug army.
are you aware of the concept of proportionality ? now, compare the amount of copyright imprisonments to the number of similar level 'violators' like him. then compare your hundreds of dealers and smugglers being arrested to what i described above.
maybe youre someone easy to please... since you are easily satisfied with 'hundreds' of dealers, smugglers being arrested, while drug cartels are able to run countries, and even governmental 'agencies' like cia is running drugs to finance its operations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_drug_trafficking
are you aware that, what you sample above, is not even a tiny dot on a fly that lands on a huge pile of bullcrap, compared to what is happening in usa-mexico drug lane ? are you aware that, the drug cartels just next to your mexican border, are now equipped with SO expensive weapons that, their average equipment level is more than the average equipment of an u.s. army front line soldier ? do you think that is possible with just running a few hidden stashes of drugs to and fro from the border ?
here is your citation. this is news media. if you want to research, search procter & gamble, unilever, benckiser to see how narrow your chemical products choice actually is.
It sounds more like people who play on consoles likely also do other things, like have a life.
eewwwwwwwwww 'have a life' card was called. im out of the juvenile-destined discussion at this point. come back when you are grown up enough to know that there is no such thing as 'having a life' or the opposite.
Slashdot Mirror
i have used wikipedia to great extent. only witless morons who are not able to notice citation and references the articles are constructed from, talk blabberscrap about wikipedia.
so, because they begged, you are not going to wikipedia. before, you had no issues using the communal resource everyone came together and created, for FREE. however, when they asked you to give a hand for the costs, you have suddenly got irritated.
maybe its good that you are contributing to the effort, by not going.
using a communal resource freely and not donating for its costs, a viable model for decent behavior ?
its as if they are doing this consciously, to break down the patent system by showing how absurd and illogical it is. it is SO extreme that, well, extreme.
What we do is to exchange market for technologies
true and true. its a basic trade. they gave technology, chinese gave them the money. (as market).
rand corporation's consolidation trend report will satisfy i presume. in the end its from the same political spectrum. yet, still an example from banking :
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-13/soros-says-u-s-bank-oligopoly-should-be-broken-up-update1-.html
the homework i gave you, will also open you into a world of wonders. remember to research the owners of unilever et al.
And you still don't seem to understand what "monopoly" means. Here's a hint: there's a reason it starts with "mono".
there is no difference in between oligopoly or monopoly from citizens' side.
if you want to research, search procter & gamble, unilever, benckiser to see how narrow your chemical products choice actually is.
yeeeeeeees. they are after americans. yees. they are after american riches and whatnot yees.
china doesnt obey wto and imf. very probably because these are organizations who are in u.s. mandate, always doing whatever u.s. wants. even in the trade conflict in early 2000s between eu and u.s., they didnt act objectively.
and how did america become a superpower again ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/dictators.html
it is easy to become a superpower if you are able to dominate more than half of the world into a dominion, allowing you to use their raw resources cheaply and monopolizingly, and use them as markets to export.
Everyone knows this because the news is 20 years old, you idiot. And no, I am not American.
maybe because of the bold part, that you still do not know that there are bazillions of americans that do not know that 20 year old news.
i blame them because i see the pattern on stuff that relate to issues they are 'sensitive' (actually bigoted) about. i mean, even with other zealot types, if you provide enough facts, they do not go medieval. but with these, there is no evading that.
this is what happens if you elect a clown as prime minister. eventually your country becomes laughed at.
unfortunately it doesnt matter how you convey it. regardless of your language, you will see that if anything you put forth is not compatible with any certain radical party's views (regardless of what the party is), you get trollmodded or reacted in harsh words. out of the blue. this has been such in my experience in the last 1 to 1.5 months. i tried varying approaches to tone and manner, substance and language, yet result is the same.
no surprise though. it is no different in real life. regardless of how politely, nicely, smoothly you put any fact that contradicts a certain biased group's views, there is a certain break point at which they will go medieval. what the tone changes is just the time that that breakpoint comes. in addition, there are some trigger subjects that instantly tick their breakpoint, regardless of what you say.
its simply they cant handle the truth. doesnt matter how solid it is.
its because you american right wingers are bigoted psychopaths who cant face truth. when you check my comments, moron, you will notice that all of them had been chain downmodded even if they were giving out FACTUAL information with links and references of information to the wrongdoings of united states, from united states government ITSELF.
bottom line is, you morons cant face the truth. its too much. here, again :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_drug_trafficking
CIA DOES DRUG TRAFFICKING AND SUPPORTS PETTY DICTATORS WITH DRUG MONEY.
i take it you didnt dare read the linked article.
In 1989, the United States invaded Panama as part of Operation Just Cause, which involved 25,000 American troops. Gen. Manuel Noriega, head of government of Panama, had been giving military assistance to Contra groups in Nicaragua at the request of the U.S.—which, in exchange, allowed him to continue his drug-trafficking activities—which they had known about since the 1960s.[12][13] When the DEA tried to indict Noriega in 1971, the CIA prevented them from doing so.[12] The CIA, which was then directed by future president George H. W. Bush, provided Noriega with hundreds of thousands of dollars per year as payment for his work in Latin America.[12] However, when CIA pilot Eugene Hasenfus was shot down over Nicaragua by the Sandinistas, documents aboard the plane revealed many of the CIA's activities in Latin America, and the CIA's connections with Noriega became a public relations "liability" for the U.S. government, which finally allowed the DEA to indict him for drug trafficking, after decades of allowing his drug operations to proceed unchecked.[12] Operation Just Cause, whose ostensible purpose was to capture Noriega, killed numerous Panamanian civilians, but was successful in removing Noriega. The operation pushed Noriega back into the town asylum along with Papal Nuncio where he surrendered to U.S. authorities. His trial took place in Miami, where he was sentenced to 45 years in prison.
huh ? it was too much learning that cia had been drug trafficking ?
i am not implying, stating that the government agencies tasked with their duties are not doing their duties despite there are FAR worse problems on the planet that they are tasked with countering in their own country, but instead they are going after whatever particular private interests want.
i dont think you are able to perceive the scale of this issue. drug trafficking basically is something that causes WARS. or propagates and fuels them. it is that big a problem.
yet you see the agencies tasked with preventing it, doing a few hundred arrests per year for show, but, as you have seen the referenced information, supporting the drug trafficking instead.
what happened ? dumbstruck when faced with the fact that even cia has been running and aiding drug operations ? so you fall back to 'punctuation' and decide my 'lunacy' based on 'first couple of sentences' ?
basically, you are saying that you didnt know shit about these, and i have won the argument.
no fool. hundreds, thousands of dealers, smugglers, are still nothing. for, drug trafficking in the global scale, is something that is able to finance civil wars, operations of secret agencies on the scale like cia did in vietnam, entire countries' repression (afghanistan), endless amount of islamic/radical terror organizations in middle east and globally, and a whole fucking army better equipped than u.s. army, which is currently fighting the mexican army that has been equipped by usa to fight that drug army.
are you aware of the concept of proportionality ? now, compare the amount of copyright imprisonments to the number of similar level 'violators' like him. then compare your hundreds of dealers and smugglers being arrested to what i described above.
maybe youre someone easy to please... since you are easily satisfied with 'hundreds' of dealers, smugglers being arrested, while drug cartels are able to run countries, and even governmental 'agencies' like cia is running drugs to finance its operations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_drug_trafficking
are you aware that, what you sample above, is not even a tiny dot on a fly that lands on a huge pile of bullcrap, compared to what is happening in usa-mexico drug lane ? are you aware that, the drug cartels just next to your mexican border, are now equipped with SO expensive weapons that, their average equipment level is more than the average equipment of an u.s. army front line soldier ? do you think that is possible with just running a few hidden stashes of drugs to and fro from the border ?
but, they are able to catch 'copyright thieves'.
all the difference in between these, is that the latter hasnt gone mafia and started placing/bribing people in government.
way to go, united states of hypocritica.
http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1867262&cid=34218862
here is your citation. this is news media. if you want to research, search procter & gamble, unilever, benckiser to see how narrow your chemical products choice actually is.
It sounds more like people who play on consoles likely also do other things, like have a life.
eewwwwwwwwww 'have a life' card was called. im out of the juvenile-destined discussion at this point. come back when you are grown up enough to know that there is no such thing as 'having a life' or the opposite.