What idiot would confess to crimes they didn't commit (or being part of a group committing those crimes) and then be surprised when that draws the attention of the authorities?
kids.
with your logic, you can convict a 6 year old who says 'dodo' during a national anthem.
there is WAY too many hacking going on. and for some twist of fate, this just predates the pending internet censorship/control scheme vote in american senate. and, american sources are attacked. way too many 'coincidence'.
either this is some shady operation, or there is no course called 'statistics' on this planet.
or maybe you dont know shit about server administration/security ? are you aware that the foremost method to break into servers is ddosing them, causing normally unexploitable bugs and exploits become vulnerable ? and no server, even the most secure oses and cluster balanced servers are impervious to this ?
Just about all the people on LulzSec are posting on Flickr, Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, and 4chan... Many of them have posted videos of themselves, and there are a lot of "leaked" videos where they did video conferences with each other regularly.. Make no mistake, the majority of them are teenagers..
i dont know which is more appalling - the above, or the fact that you BELIEVE that those kids are who they claim to be.... posting a video on facebook and claiming to be someone, makes you someone ? are you forgetting that these are kids ?
in the land of the free, and prosperity, where 85% of the society get only 15% of everything, despite working 6-7 days a week in two or more jobs with minimum wage, without rest, and SOMEHOW, still there are sons of whores easily justifying this abomination by saying that anyone who are unfortunate, are 'lazy'.
really. is it that, or, it is easier to be statistically challenged for your conscience ?
google 'human development index' and see the picture of shame.
'it was in the pipeline', and it needed to be pushed right at the time of the takeover, right ? youre too naive. even if it was in the pipeline, such rush would mean that they shoved in something they urgently wanted, and pushed it with it.
One wonders, why. Why does a takeover/merger need in immediate abrupt disruption of release cycle.
unless you are pushing some questionable crap into customers. like govt. mandated backdoors, cutting in front of competitors, wiretapping or other crap ?
Maybe now the 'forestry industry' which so brutally fucks up forests worldwide can slow down. They are even mowing down the lungs of the planet in amazon. for their profit. hmmmm..... i think i remember this theme from somewhere.
do you know that banks can lend 10x the real assets they hold, and that those assets dont even need to be solid, real world assets, and the majority of the 'money' that goes around are in that electronic/bond/assurance form, rather than solid money ?
i hate to break it to you, but the forefather of the mindset here today, was saying that government should not intervene how people do their things back when slavery was made illegal. not to mention that they started a civil war over it.
there is no difference in between this and then. the only reason, they dont have the power to break away into a civil war now. had they not had the power back then, they would say the same 'dont intervene in business' bullshit back then instead of going into civil war.
We see that you big boys (3-4 corps, you know which) are going rather fast in your crusade to do some progress, and it is to some extent commendable, but, dont forget - in the end, you are just 4 corporations, regardless of how big and influential you are. (yes, even google). If you lose yourself and forget about the community that builds on the standards by deciding and implementing them without the community, the community will shove those up your ass.
no really. the hundreds of millions of web developers, webmasters, smalltime site operators have that much power - they were the power which tipped the internet in google's favor, with adsense - google had catered to these with adsense, whereas all the big boys ( then - like yahoo, altavista, microsoft) were shunning and excluding them in their business.
why is there a law for this ? oh wait - i know. because when the forefathers of republican mindset (although they were named different then - were going to be democrats) caused a civil war which they have lost, when someone attempted to put out a law banning slavery.
so, your logic is, we should start a war this time too ?
people halfway across the world can't steal my paper cash money electronically through my computer just because I went to a dodgy website with an insecure web browser
is it. how do you think the identity thefts are conducted, leave aside your cash disappearing through cayman islands via an unauthorized wire... fool. dont wander too much around online. you dont know shit about security.
with the legal obligation that your bank has, comes innumerable liabilities for you ranging from privacy to currency fluctuations to financial manipulation of entire system.
Slashdot Mirror
What idiot would confess to crimes they didn't commit (or being part of a group committing those crimes) and then be surprised when that draws the attention of the authorities?
kids.
with your logic, you can convict a 6 year old who says 'dodo' during a national anthem.
when the correlation goes statistically improbably congruent, it implies causation - direct or indirect.
time will tell, and you, my moronic little sister, will know the truth.
so then, you are in the same basket with us ...
there is WAY too many hacking going on. and for some twist of fate, this just predates the pending internet censorship/control scheme vote in american senate. and, american sources are attacked. way too many 'coincidence'.
either this is some shady operation, or there is no course called 'statistics' on this planet.
or maybe you dont know shit about server administration/security ? are you aware that the foremost method to break into servers is ddosing them, causing normally unexploitable bugs and exploits become vulnerable ? and no server, even the most secure oses and cluster balanced servers are impervious to this ?
Just about all the people on LulzSec are posting on Flickr, Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, and 4chan... Many of them have posted videos of themselves, and there are a lot of "leaked" videos where they did video conferences with each other regularly.. Make no mistake, the majority of them are teenagers..
i dont know which is more appalling - the above, or the fact that you BELIEVE that those kids are who they claim to be .... posting a video on facebook and claiming to be someone, makes you someone ? are you forgetting that these are kids ?
"Governments are going to win whatever the outcome" - how will that happen with the root of the hacking scene now being in russia.
i still have put thought into how the hell you might have concluded 'with most of Lulzsec being teenage kids' ...
in the end, i decided that you are a moron, else you wouldnt conclude the below without having enough information - which anyone cant have.
just say that 'we are not able to get to the real people in russia, china, and arresting pimpleface kids to save face'.
disgusting.
in the land of the free, and prosperity, where 85% of the society get only 15% of everything, despite working 6-7 days a week in two or more jobs with minimum wage, without rest, and SOMEHOW, still there are sons of whores easily justifying this abomination by saying that anyone who are unfortunate, are 'lazy'.
really. is it that, or, it is easier to be statistically challenged for your conscience ?
google 'human development index' and see the picture of shame.
'it was in the pipeline', and it needed to be pushed right at the time of the takeover, right ? youre too naive. even if it was in the pipeline, such rush would mean that they shoved in something they urgently wanted, and pushed it with it.
One wonders, why. Why does a takeover/merger need in immediate abrupt disruption of release cycle.
unless you are pushing some questionable crap into customers. like govt. mandated backdoors, cutting in front of competitors, wiretapping or other crap ?
Its called linux. all firefox needs, is to bundle an acceptable linux kernel together with an installer and firefox.
Maybe now the 'forestry industry' which so brutally fucks up forests worldwide can slow down. They are even mowing down the lungs of the planet in amazon. for their profit. hmmmm ..... i think i remember this theme from somewhere.
This is the point where it passes into 'hilarious' .....
we are now living in a monty python comedy skit - not real life any more.
is it ?
do you know that banks can lend 10x the real assets they hold, and that those assets dont even need to be solid, real world assets, and the majority of the 'money' that goes around are in that electronic/bond/assurance form, rather than solid money ?
and do you know what the term liquidity means ?
i hate to break it to you, but the forefather of the mindset here today, was saying that government should not intervene how people do their things back when slavery was made illegal. not to mention that they started a civil war over it.
there is no difference in between this and then. the only reason, they dont have the power to break away into a civil war now. had they not had the power back then, they would say the same 'dont intervene in business' bullshit back then instead of going into civil war.
We see that you big boys (3-4 corps, you know which) are going rather fast in your crusade to do some progress, and it is to some extent commendable, but, dont forget - in the end, you are just 4 corporations, regardless of how big and influential you are. (yes, even google). If you lose yourself and forget about the community that builds on the standards by deciding and implementing them without the community, the community will shove those up your ass.
no really. the hundreds of millions of web developers, webmasters, smalltime site operators have that much power - they were the power which tipped the internet in google's favor, with adsense - google had catered to these with adsense, whereas all the big boys ( then - like yahoo, altavista, microsoft) were shunning and excluding them in their business.
why is there a law for this ? oh wait - i know. because when the forefathers of republican mindset (although they were named different then - were going to be democrats) caused a civil war which they have lost, when someone attempted to put out a law banning slavery.
so, your logic is, we should start a war this time too ?
japanese yen stored in an american bank, is no different than bitcoin hash put in the same bank's safe you own.
people halfway across the world can't steal my paper cash money electronically through my computer just because I went to a dodgy website with an insecure web browser
is it. how do you think the identity thefts are conducted, leave aside your cash disappearing through cayman islands via an unauthorized wire ... fool. dont wander too much around online. you dont know shit about security.
with the legal obligation that your bank has, comes innumerable liabilities for you ranging from privacy to currency fluctuations to financial manipulation of entire system.
you can do the same with bitcoin. you can have numerous wallets, keep them all in different places, even offline computers/flashdisks.
you can also put your bitcoins in an OFFLINE computer. or flashdisk. or a secure 'bank' that will keep them.
thats a credit card. a credit card is not money. in real life, if your money is stolen, it is stolen.