The only people that have the blueprints to the WTC is the government even though they were built with public money and no longer exist. I find it difficult to believe a civil engineer would certify another engineers collapse findings without reviewing the blueprints first hand.
Whenever an event happens and the documented evidence does not correlate with the governments account the people have a right to question their government. We the people deserver total honesty from our government in order to make informed political decisions. While you certainly may be indifferent to government cover-ups others are not. At the very least if there is at least a shred of truth to any of the conspiracy theories in the absence of public scrutiny they will be engendered to commit more brazen attacks.
Actually this is a pissing contest between the People and the government. If a consensus of citizens has doubts about the government's account of 9/11 and demand the government release all the evidence and research they have on 9/11 then they are obligated to do so. If the people demand a new completely independent 9/11 commission with full access then the government must concede. It doesn't matter if the government thinks it is foolish or a waste of time; plain and simple the people demand it and since the governments only purpose of existence is to serve all of its citizens they must comply. We have a right to petition our government and we make no apologies for exercising that right.
There were many reports of molten metal that smolder weeks after the attacked. Molten metal can be seen dripping from WTC 2 moments before the collapse so indeed molten metal existed. The question is what was it and how was it created.
All scientific theories should be independently verifiable. Simply because the government asserts an explanation does not by virtue make it true.
Certainly it would be much easier to confirm the governments account if they would release the blueprints of the WTC centers, allow access to the few WTC metal samples that were salvaged from ground zero, and share all of their scientific analysis with the public. Is this too much to ask from our government?
I too have read that article but have found it to be inadequate in explaining the deficiencies of the official account. Namely:
it doesn't explain the hijacking simulations conducted during 911 nor mentions the previous NORAD simulation of hijacked commercial aircraft attacking the WTC. The article did not MSNBC reported the military scrambled jets 67 times to intercept suspicious aircraft the year prior to 9/11. Also remember flight 93 was known to be hijacked for over two hours until it was destroyed.
It doesn't explain the localized explosions that occurred during the collapse of the WTC well bellow the demolition wave above falling at the speed of gravity
It doesn't mention the vast amount of molten metal reported at the site smoldering weeks after the attack
It doesn't explain the governments peculiar behavior towards 9/11 , i.e. Not releasing all videos of the pentagon attack, Sibel Edmunds, government ignoring and blocking Al Qaeda investigation pre-911, blocking out FEMA and NTSB from the attack sites, year late formation of the 9/11 commission, not releasing the WTC building plans to the public,etc
Even better then eyewitness accounts would be for the government to release the all of the other video's they confiscated immediately after the attacks. There are at least three others. What would be a valid reason not to?
The most compelling evidence to me that the official government account was incorrect was the videographic evidence of separate explosions in the WTC tower when the second plane hit the tower and visible explosions well below the demolition waves as the towers were collapsing. Also white smoke could be seen at the bottom of the tower before the first collapse and the lobby of the WTC was in shambles before the collapse far below the planes impact. According to the governments report jet fuel fell down the elevator shafts 60+ stories and ignited at the base causing all the visible destruction in the lobby. Building 7 is also an anomaly the government is still working on a report about.
Eyewitness 9/11 is a good video to watch
[URL:http://universalseed.org/]
As well as Dr. Jones's research
Both explanations for the WTC collapses have serious consequences. On one hand If the collapses were due to the buildings infrastructure weakening due to fire and gravity did the rest then all future terrorists would have to do is take out a couple of upper floors on a skyscraper and watch the show. People working in 47+ buildings should be afraid that a few small fires in the building would cause a total destructive collapse as it did in the collapse of building 7. On the other hand if the government was complicit in the attacks in order to justify dramatic increased military spending then that presents its own set of ramifications.
Personally I would like to see a new completely independent investigation with full government access into the events of 9/11; everything the 9/11 commission was suppose to be but wasn't.
It is intriguing that they did not uncover this glaring defense weakness when they simulated commercial airliners crashing into the twin towers two years before the attack
Perhaps that is why the CIA was conducting a simulation the day of the attack
Bush keeps changing his account of what happened during the attack that it would be laughable to hear what he would say if he were not publicly visible.
Revisiting 9/11
Bush has publicly reported twice that he saw the first plane hit the WTC live on a TV at the school even though it was not televised until a couple days later.
Also worth noting is that the Bush family has documented ties to the Bin Laden family and that the Bin Laden family was given preferential treatment when they were evacuated during the flight ban as discussed in Fahrenheit 9/11
Do your own research and form your own independent opinions. If you take all the facts at face value and still believe the official 9/11 story then your views are justified. Just because Wolf Blitzer on CNN didn't spoon feed you all the facts of 9/11 doesn't mean they don't exist.
Here are a couple sites to start your research at.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/ http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.ht ml
Slashdot Mirror
The only people that have the blueprints to the WTC is the government even though they were built with public money and no longer exist. I find it difficult to believe a civil engineer would certify another engineers collapse findings without reviewing the blueprints first hand.
Whenever an event happens and the documented evidence does not correlate with the governments account the people have a right to question their government. We the people deserver total honesty from our government in order to make informed political decisions. While you certainly may be indifferent to government cover-ups others are not. At the very least if there is at least a shred of truth to any of the conspiracy theories in the absence of public scrutiny they will be engendered to commit more brazen attacks.
Actually this is a pissing contest between the People and the government. If a consensus of citizens has doubts about the government's account of 9/11 and demand the government release all the evidence and research they have on 9/11 then they are obligated to do so. If the people demand a new completely independent 9/11 commission with full access then the government must concede. It doesn't matter if the government thinks it is foolish or a waste of time; plain and simple the people demand it and since the governments only purpose of existence is to serve all of its citizens they must comply. We have a right to petition our government and we make no apologies for exercising that right.
There were many reports of molten metal that smolder weeks after the attacked. Molten metal can be seen dripping from WTC 2 moments before the collapse so indeed molten metal existed. The question is what was it and how was it created. All scientific theories should be independently verifiable. Simply because the government asserts an explanation does not by virtue make it true. Certainly it would be much easier to confirm the governments account if they would release the blueprints of the WTC centers, allow access to the few WTC metal samples that were salvaged from ground zero, and share all of their scientific analysis with the public. Is this too much to ask from our government?
Even better then eyewitness accounts would be for the government to release the all of the other video's they confiscated immediately after the attacks. There are at least three others. What would be a valid reason not to?
analysis of flight 77 passengers
The most compelling evidence to me that the official government account was incorrect was the videographic evidence of separate explosions in the WTC tower when the second plane hit the tower and visible explosions well below the demolition waves as the towers were collapsing. Also white smoke could be seen at the bottom of the tower before the first collapse and the lobby of the WTC was in shambles before the collapse far below the planes impact. According to the governments report jet fuel fell down the elevator shafts 60+ stories and ignited at the base causing all the visible destruction in the lobby. Building 7 is also an anomaly the government is still working on a report about.
Eyewitness 9/11 is a good video to watch [URL:http://universalseed.org/]
As well as Dr. Jones's research
Both explanations for the WTC collapses have serious consequences. On one hand If the collapses were due to the buildings infrastructure weakening due to fire and gravity did the rest then all future terrorists would have to do is take out a couple of upper floors on a skyscraper and watch the show. People working in 47+ buildings should be afraid that a few small fires in the building would cause a total destructive collapse as it did in the collapse of building 7. On the other hand if the government was complicit in the attacks in order to justify dramatic increased military spending then that presents its own set of ramifications.
Personally I would like to see a new completely independent investigation with full government access into the events of 9/11; everything the 9/11 commission was suppose to be but wasn't.
CIA simulations the day of the attack
It is intriguing that they did not uncover this glaring defense weakness when they simulated commercial airliners crashing into the twin towers two years before the attack Perhaps that is why the CIA was conducting a simulation the day of the attack
Bush keeps changing his account of what happened during the attack that it would be laughable to hear what he would say if he were not publicly visible. Revisiting 9/11 Bush has publicly reported twice that he saw the first plane hit the WTC live on a TV at the school even though it was not televised until a couple days later.
Also worth noting is that the Bush family has documented ties to the Bin Laden family and that the Bin Laden family was given preferential treatment when they were evacuated during the flight ban as discussed in Fahrenheit 9/11
Do your own research and form your own independent opinions. If you take all the facts at face value and still believe the official 9/11 story then your views are justified. Just because Wolf Blitzer on CNN didn't spoon feed you all the facts of 9/11 doesn't mean they don't exist.t ml
Here are a couple sites to start your research at.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.h