Ok, smartypants, quick: Define the word "clock" in the phrase, "real clock" such that it includes your desired type of clock, but rejects all stopwatches and timers. LOL
If you ever get a chance to learn English, you'll find it is a much more forgiving language than that. All the known meanings used for a word are considered correct. So the type of insufferable pedanticism that you display, while available in some languages that have an official Authoritay on correctness, are guaranteed to be falsehoods and idiocies in English.
That's because it was words, expressing an idea. There isn't something you'd look up, instead you'd have to think about his words and keep thinking until they make sense. That will be the hint that you might have understood them.
If it doesn't make sense yet, you didn't understand it yet, keep trying.
Chess traditionally has fixed time, and even in modern time controls it is only a few seconds at most are added per move. But you still know exactly how many seconds are added, and when, and managing that time is a critically important part of competitive chess at all levels, from local amateur to the world championship.
Time can be paused to talk to the arbiter (referee) but pausing the time when you don't have a legit claim is a foul that can be penalized by a loss of time.
It is hilarious that there would be people willing to argue such a stupid lie.
The only explanation is that you didn't hear about this new website called youtube where you can find clips that step through frame-by-frame and show if there even was contact, or not!
Sadly, it tells us that you're a soccer fan, and that the team you rut for doesn't often win, so they try this shit all the time.
After 3 dives, you're banned for 1 calendar year, and all players from the same team have to receive 5 strokes on the field before the next game that they play in, and at the end each game they receive 1 stroke for each cumulative team yellow card.
And if they flop during caning, they forfeit half their pay for the season.
No. Just because it can be described does not mean it is a description. So things that exist are not automatically information, but the words you use to describe them are. All meta-data is information, but only data that intentionally instructs is information. Even interesting and instructive data only becomes information when you realize that it is interesting and respond by forming ideas about it in your mind; information is literally the something that forms the mind.
It often was. I mean, think about who your friends are, and how they keep their hovels.
But the store Blockbuster also sold (and rented; YMMV) special VHS and Betamax cassettes where instead of a magnetic data tape, they had an absorbent textile tape and a solvent reservoir; this could used to clean your tape heads.
The cleaning solvent is the same as used with magnetic server backup tape drives.
Thank you for the good explanation of additional details.
Just wanted to reiterate that the cost is only high, and in fact only even exists, when using threading within a single process; using the unix style of fork/exec leaves the GIL not even having a cost at all.
Generally the language designers assume that if you care about performance, you can do it the old way painlessly, but if you don't care about performance, you shouldn't even have to worry about it. And a GIL provides for both of these situations.
You'd have done better to re-read the thread since you forgot what was being talked about.
You seem really confused about if your data is really important, or not really important. Make up your fucking mind, and then your problems are solved and you can take responsibility for the administration of your own damn system.
Fuck an A, man, sysadmining one box isn't actually hard.
Sorry for adding the spoiler, but in this case "kinda lax" is a sarcastic way of saying, "missing or absent." The npn "review" process is that after somebody injects malware, and it gets pushed out, then if enough people report it as a bug it might get removed.
It is the same as everything else, if you're willing to install dependencies and allow them to automatically update, you're already p0wned.
Is the correct way to handle code reuse to learn from code already written, and to reuse the code that does what you want, or is it a crutch that lets you write code you don't actually understand how to write?
If I'm going to use a JS library, I'm going to choose it very carefully, and then place it inside my project. Even without the security considerations, just stuffing it into your project where the bleeding-edge version is automatically tracked, that's just asking to get hit early with every type of bug, not just the security ones and malfeatures from jerks and criminals. I don't want today's version; and if it is doing something critical where I need to care about updates, then using a third party project doesn't mean I can stop following the news about exploits; it actually means I have to follow it more closely than otherwise.
Updates aren't magic, they're an attack vector; you need to have a human evaluate the situation and then do an update promptly if needed. Don't trust updates from a repo unless it is a repo that receives testing from human engineers! You OS updates you might therefore want to have on auto; but most package dependencies, you should be on a "stable" version. Don't develop your applications to development versions of dependencies, you don't actually need untested features.
I'm not really sure why it is needed to say this, but if you think something is a fact, it is still possible that a phrase that contains it is a platitude. If you can't use words at least that well, why write so many of them?
You seem to be intentionally missing all my points, but arguing anyways. Weak sauce.
You've obviously never had a porn site advertising AI think you were Japanese, or you'd know that the boom started years ago.
Maybe it would help to explain to you that they're often euphemistically called "dating games."
I remember one of my classmates getting kicked out of the computer lab for playing one after school. That was on an Apple ][ in the 80s. Pre-boom, to be sure.
Sorry you can't comprehend that you're not brain damaged because you're a man, you're brain damaged because you were fed machismo pap as a child, and internalized it.
Real men don't have to dehumanize women in order to forgive themselves for not having a giant cock. And real men don't have to blame women for their lack of valuable communication, because they are in fact able to communicate with women, and do get value out of the interactions.
I believe Porn has led the way in leveraging technology in one way or another since the beginning f time.
I bet the first Cave Art was probably of naked women. but it was erased by someone's mother.
If you look into primitive art, it is highly unlikely that it is the mothers erasing pictures of naked women.
The two themes most prevalent in primitive art are hunting and motherhood.
Somebody's mother is more likely to have erased hunting pictures to make room for motherhood pictures, which generally consist of naked women.
Naked women as porn don't appear in primitive art until the agricultural revolution, when people started living in fixed homes and had leisure time while well fed. Prior to that, leisure time implied seasonal shortages without enough available food to make hunting and gathering worthwhile. So the art themes were usually resource-related; animals, and breasts containing sufficient milk to feed a child.
Also, starting at that time men appear to have spent a few thousand years making dick pics before they even started on pictures of sex. Women as sexualized art objects came even later than that.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok, smartypants, quick: Define the word "clock" in the phrase, "real clock" such that it includes your desired type of clock, but rejects all stopwatches and timers. LOL
If you ever get a chance to learn English, you'll find it is a much more forgiving language than that. All the known meanings used for a word are considered correct. So the type of insufferable pedanticism that you display, while available in some languages that have an official Authoritay on correctness, are guaranteed to be falsehoods and idiocies in English.
TLDR; Get a fucking dictionary, will you?!
PS calling it "soccer" means you are not in touch with the football world, as there is only one country that calls it that way
That's not true, we call it soccer in the US too.
Oh, wait, you didn't know that one of the biggest soccer countries calls it soccer?
LMAO
That's because it was words, expressing an idea. There isn't something you'd look up, instead you'd have to think about his words and keep thinking until they make sense. That will be the hint that you might have understood them.
If it doesn't make sense yet, you didn't understand it yet, keep trying.
We speak English, it doesn't have whatever that symbol is. So get used it when you're talking to people from an English-speaking country.
Words, they're what's for dinner!
Chess traditionally has fixed time, and even in modern time controls it is only a few seconds at most are added per move. But you still know exactly how many seconds are added, and when, and managing that time is a critically important part of competitive chess at all levels, from local amateur to the world championship.
Time can be paused to talk to the arbiter (referee) but pausing the time when you don't have a legit claim is a foul that can be penalized by a loss of time.
It is hilarious that there would be people willing to argue such a stupid lie.
The only explanation is that you didn't hear about this new website called youtube where you can find clips that step through frame-by-frame and show if there even was contact, or not!
Sadly, it tells us that you're a soccer fan, and that the team you rut for doesn't often win, so they try this shit all the time.
After 3 dives, you're banned for 1 calendar year, and all players from the same team have to receive 5 strokes on the field before the next game that they play in, and at the end each game they receive 1 stroke for each cumulative team yellow card.
And if they flop during caning, they forfeit half their pay for the season.
Except, the sport has minimal contact, minimal injuries, and they're almost always faking.
Faked injuries are an order of magnitude more prevalent than real injuries.
How is it even a "sport" when the most important tactic is, "I can't do it, I can't do it!"
No. Just because it can be described does not mean it is a description. So things that exist are not automatically information, but the words you use to describe them are. All meta-data is information, but only data that intentionally instructs is information. Even interesting and instructive data only becomes information when you realize that it is interesting and respond by forming ideas about it in your mind; information is literally the something that forms the mind.
That sounds dirty.
It often was. I mean, think about who your friends are, and how they keep their hovels.
But the store Blockbuster also sold (and rented; YMMV) special VHS and Betamax cassettes where instead of a magnetic data tape, they had an absorbent textile tape and a solvent reservoir; this could used to clean your tape heads.
The cleaning solvent is the same as used with magnetic server backup tape drives.
I said it above; dick pics were the first porn by thousands of years.
Thank you for the good explanation of additional details.
Just wanted to reiterate that the cost is only high, and in fact only even exists, when using threading within a single process; using the unix style of fork/exec leaves the GIL not even having a cost at all.
Generally the language designers assume that if you care about performance, you can do it the old way painlessly, but if you don't care about performance, you shouldn't even have to worry about it. And a GIL provides for both of these situations.
Neckbeards and humans are different, too.
You'd have done better to re-read the thread since you forgot what was being talked about.
You seem really confused about if your data is really important, or not really important. Make up your fucking mind, and then your problems are solved and you can take responsibility for the administration of your own damn system.
Fuck an A, man, sysadmining one box isn't actually hard.
Sorry for adding the spoiler, but in this case "kinda lax" is a sarcastic way of saying, "missing or absent." The npn "review" process is that after somebody injects malware, and it gets pushed out, then if enough people report it as a bug it might get removed.
It is the same as everything else, if you're willing to install dependencies and allow them to automatically update, you're already p0wned.
Is the correct way to handle code reuse to learn from code already written, and to reuse the code that does what you want, or is it a crutch that lets you write code you don't actually understand how to write?
If I'm going to use a JS library, I'm going to choose it very carefully, and then place it inside my project. Even without the security considerations, just stuffing it into your project where the bleeding-edge version is automatically tracked, that's just asking to get hit early with every type of bug, not just the security ones and malfeatures from jerks and criminals. I don't want today's version; and if it is doing something critical where I need to care about updates, then using a third party project doesn't mean I can stop following the news about exploits; it actually means I have to follow it more closely than otherwise.
Updates aren't magic, they're an attack vector; you need to have a human evaluate the situation and then do an update promptly if needed. Don't trust updates from a repo unless it is a repo that receives testing from human engineers! You OS updates you might therefore want to have on auto; but most package dependencies, you should be on a "stable" version. Don't develop your applications to development versions of dependencies, you don't actually need untested features.
I'm not really sure why it is needed to say this, but if you think something is a fact, it is still possible that a phrase that contains it is a platitude. If you can't use words at least that well, why write so many of them?
You seem to be intentionally missing all my points, but arguing anyways. Weak sauce.
I'm just glad IceCube is doing something useful with the rest of his life.
You've obviously never had a porn site advertising AI think you were Japanese, or you'd know that the boom started years ago.
Maybe it would help to explain to you that they're often euphemistically called "dating games."
I remember one of my classmates getting kicked out of the computer lab for playing one after school. That was on an Apple ][ in the 80s. Pre-boom, to be sure.
Sorry you can't comprehend that you're not brain damaged because you're a man, you're brain damaged because you were fed machismo pap as a child, and internalized it.
Real men don't have to dehumanize women in order to forgive themselves for not having a giant cock. And real men don't have to blame women for their lack of valuable communication, because they are in fact able to communicate with women, and do get value out of the interactions.
You're right that it is pretty simple, though.
I think the key word was "skinny," not "big."
Everybody knows most of slashdot has giant boobs, it's the chest:waist ratio that leads them to fantasy worlds.
I believe Porn has led the way in leveraging technology in one way or another since the beginning f time.
I bet the first Cave Art was probably of naked women. but it was erased by someone's mother.
If you look into primitive art, it is highly unlikely that it is the mothers erasing pictures of naked women.
The two themes most prevalent in primitive art are hunting and motherhood.
Somebody's mother is more likely to have erased hunting pictures to make room for motherhood pictures, which generally consist of naked women.
Naked women as porn don't appear in primitive art until the agricultural revolution, when people started living in fixed homes and had leisure time while well fed. Prior to that, leisure time implied seasonal shortages without enough available food to make hunting and gathering worthwhile. So the art themes were usually resource-related; animals, and breasts containing sufficient milk to feed a child.
Also, starting at that time men appear to have spent a few thousand years making dick pics before they even started on pictures of sex. Women as sexualized art objects came even later than that.
I don't know about 30 years, the first one I saw was no earlier than 1994.
But, a long time.