You might have seen some headlines about 12 Russians being indicted for the hacks attributed to the group persona "Guiccifer 2.0."
I mean, either you know that Guiccifer 2.0 is a name used by a Russian military intelligence (GRU) and are just lying, or else you don't even follow the subject and your claim to have a bunch of words worth of analysis is a lie. You're completely full of shit either way.
It is true that they used some Romanian servers, and probably even visited Romania.
12 indictments of Russians for hacking attributed to Guiccifer 2.0. If you want to see the evidence, talk them into traveling to the US and the evidence will be presented; during the trial.
So how exactly did Canada meddle in the US election.
Even in my small city I encountered a Canadian during the election, he was all like, "They're all a bunch of wankers, eh? Are those really your best and brightest?"
Canadians are always trying to sew discord and anarchy through mildly negative observations. Sometimes they even resort to passive-aggressive insults.
No, Stalin was trying to goad the Americans into invading, which never happened. He knew that only through the horrors of war would Europeans ever want to be Communist.
He killed almost as many people as Hitler, but it wasn't done for direct reasons; and the indirect reasons failed. That is the level of evil the Russian state is capable of; killing millions of people is merely a tactic.
You either didn't have "life savings" but just a few months of savings, or else there were other unrelated reasons that were the primary ones involved in whatever you "lost." By which you probably meant, "spent."
When you type in a tag like that and don't get the result you want, it isn't that the website software is old and doesn't know what to do, it is that those tags are considered harmful, and intentionally stripped out or converted to safe values.
Use the allowed tags, stop trying to be an asshole. Stop complaining that tags whose entire purpose is to assist passive-aggressive behavior are intentionally stripped out. That's a feature. If you feel the urge to strike something through, just fucking delete it and don't say it. Done. Or at least^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HNaw, nevermind, you wouldn't understand.
I don't know what kind of software you develop, but we have on-site development only for security concerns. Not only that, but certain developer offices are physically locked to prevent unauthorized access.
What a horrible work environment. I wouldn't even consider it.
I'd go the other way and consider having locked offices a huge perk! It is bad enough to be stuck in an office, but I'd rather be in one where my team has their own territory they can defend from interlopers. That is more like working from home, where I am in a space I can protect.
Trains aren't the right shape to make efficient use of the space. These "skates" are like a carnival ride where you load in an area with headroom, but when they're traveling you're seated.
You would need to tunnel out 4x as much volume per traveler to fit a regular train.
I would say most people in the US reject public transit because they don't want to pay the extra taxes.
No. Republicans reject transit, because taxes. Blue states usually have good transit, and taxes to pay for it. In my area, when the transit district wants more money for new routes, we vote on the tax increases, and they're often approved. They're not approved as often as school and fire department taxes, but more often than for police, or new administrative buildings. They're like parks; people want to say yes, but they do check the plan first. Schools, people just vote "yes" if D, "no" if R.
LA, the place in the story, is the only major city in a D state without good transit. And the problem isn't the taxes, the problem is that LA is a suburban wasteland with no effort to force people to build "up," they built "out" to the horizon and beyond. Transit benefits heavily from population density; if you build "up" or "out" you still need transit stops about every 2 blocks, and so if density is low then you have way more stops per rider, which means that the service is slow and inefficient, and costs way way more money per rider. It also does less to alleviate traffic congestion, because the bus is making lots of stops for just 1 person. If a new type of transit technology can provide better neighborhood-neighborhood service that connects to the regular transit system, that would really really help. It could be as important for transit in LA as Caltrain is in the bay area!
Look, Dumb Ass, their last quarterly call that was discussed, and they said clearly there was no Wells Notice. That was just an attempt at stock price manipulation by some shorts. And you, apparently, since you're pushing the lie even now.
You're obviously not following the company, you're just reading a script, or you'd know at least a few details.
If you were on the front bench yesterday, today you'd be losing your job because SEC investigations are done in private. But you're not even a lawyer, much less one of the lawyers involved in this case! Back-bencher is a polite way of saying, "yes, yes, you could understand and talk about this stuff in a professional way as somebody who understands but isn't involved." No, you're not even a back-bencher, but you're definitely not on the front bench.
Having an irrational sense of capability still only supports belief in being a back-bencher, it doesn't support belief that you're actually involved in the case.
Uh, no. Subpoenas are commonly issued by the court clerk in civil matters, no judge necessary. You've been watching too much stupid fucking TV.
Only in the sense that they have to be filed with the Court, and that involves the Clerk stamping them.
They're issued by the lawyers, who are "Officers of the Court," and they don't get reviewed at all unless another lawyer challenges it. Then the Judge has to read everything and decide.
You've been watching a little less TV than the other guy, which is nice, but still too fucking much.
Slashdot Mirror
extremely amusing
My thesaurus says the word you're looking for is "ironic".
Find a new dictionary though, because ironic means it is amusing.
You do know how words work, right?
It can be subjected to code audits.
That's from 2 years ago dude. There were more stories, also published on reuters.com, from May of this year with the information I was talking about.
That's your line? I'm wrong because you missed 2 years worth of news?
I'd rather look at goats than Russian bots.
How is the general public expected to judge facts related to international intelligence operations?
There is only who you trust. It is a logic-free zone.
In Putin's Russia, self-interest targets YOU!
You might have seen some headlines about 12 Russians being indicted for the hacks attributed to the group persona "Guiccifer 2.0."
I mean, either you know that Guiccifer 2.0 is a name used by a Russian military intelligence (GRU) and are just lying, or else you don't even follow the subject and your claim to have a bunch of words worth of analysis is a lie. You're completely full of shit either way.
It is true that they used some Romanian servers, and probably even visited Romania.
12 indictments of Russians for hacking attributed to Guiccifer 2.0. If you want to see the evidence, talk them into traveling to the US and the evidence will be presented; during the trial.
popcorn
I'm waiting for some guilty verdicts. The real entertainment is when they go from being apologetic to apoplectic.
So how exactly did Canada meddle in the US election.
Even in my small city I encountered a Canadian during the election, he was all like, "They're all a bunch of wankers, eh? Are those really your best and brightest?"
Canadians are always trying to sew discord and anarchy through mildly negative observations. Sometimes they even resort to passive-aggressive insults.
No, Stalin was trying to goad the Americans into invading, which never happened. He knew that only through the horrors of war would Europeans ever want to be Communist.
He killed almost as many people as Hitler, but it wasn't done for direct reasons; and the indirect reasons failed. That is the level of evil the Russian state is capable of; killing millions of people is merely a tactic.
There is no such thing as a digital antenna in electronics.
Not even an active antenna with a class D amplifier?!?!
But some rube who cannot access the internet or get a clear signal is nothing at all.
I can haz mail merge?
You either didn't have "life savings" but just a few months of savings, or else there were other unrelated reasons that were the primary ones involved in whatever you "lost." By which you probably meant, "spent."
If we can't even agree on how the lines are numbered, I definitely don't want to work there, no matter the pay!
Learn you some computers, derpstick!
When you type in a tag like that and don't get the result you want, it isn't that the website software is old and doesn't know what to do, it is that those tags are considered harmful, and intentionally stripped out or converted to safe values.
Use the allowed tags, stop trying to be an asshole. Stop complaining that tags whose entire purpose is to assist passive-aggressive behavior are intentionally stripped out. That's a feature. If you feel the urge to strike something through, just fucking delete it and don't say it. Done. Or at least^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HNaw, nevermind, you wouldn't understand.
You will never be presented with an IQ test at a job interview in the United States. "Billy" lol
What a horrible work environment. I wouldn't even consider it.
I'd go the other way and consider having locked offices a huge perk! It is bad enough to be stuck in an office, but I'd rather be in one where my team has their own territory they can defend from interlopers. That is more like working from home, where I am in a space I can protect.
Trains aren't the right shape to make efficient use of the space. These "skates" are like a carnival ride where you load in an area with headroom, but when they're traveling you're seated.
You would need to tunnel out 4x as much volume per traveler to fit a regular train.
I would say most people in the US reject public transit because they don't want to pay the extra taxes.
No. Republicans reject transit, because taxes. Blue states usually have good transit, and taxes to pay for it. In my area, when the transit district wants more money for new routes, we vote on the tax increases, and they're often approved. They're not approved as often as school and fire department taxes, but more often than for police, or new administrative buildings. They're like parks; people want to say yes, but they do check the plan first. Schools, people just vote "yes" if D, "no" if R.
LA, the place in the story, is the only major city in a D state without good transit. And the problem isn't the taxes, the problem is that LA is a suburban wasteland with no effort to force people to build "up," they built "out" to the horizon and beyond. Transit benefits heavily from population density; if you build "up" or "out" you still need transit stops about every 2 blocks, and so if density is low then you have way more stops per rider, which means that the service is slow and inefficient, and costs way way more money per rider. It also does less to alleviate traffic congestion, because the bus is making lots of stops for just 1 person. If a new type of transit technology can provide better neighborhood-neighborhood service that connects to the regular transit system, that would really really help. It could be as important for transit in LA as Caltrain is in the bay area!
Pale Moon is a great idea but I have this unshakeable feeling that it is some kind of furry-related thing.
If it was Cheetara running the show I'd be a lot more comfortable with it.
I'll bet they don't even have Freedom Fries down there!
Evidence of what?
Another ten years.
Look, Dumb Ass, their last quarterly call that was discussed, and they said clearly there was no Wells Notice. That was just an attempt at stock price manipulation by some shorts. And you, apparently, since you're pushing the lie even now.
You're obviously not following the company, you're just reading a script, or you'd know at least a few details.
If you were on the front bench yesterday, today you'd be losing your job because SEC investigations are done in private. But you're not even a lawyer, much less one of the lawyers involved in this case! Back-bencher is a polite way of saying, "yes, yes, you could understand and talk about this stuff in a professional way as somebody who understands but isn't involved." No, you're not even a back-bencher, but you're definitely not on the front bench.
Having an irrational sense of capability still only supports belief in being a back-bencher, it doesn't support belief that you're actually involved in the case.
Uh, no. Subpoenas are commonly issued by the court clerk in civil matters, no judge necessary. You've been watching too much stupid fucking TV.
Only in the sense that they have to be filed with the Court, and that involves the Clerk stamping them.
They're issued by the lawyers, who are "Officers of the Court," and they don't get reviewed at all unless another lawyer challenges it. Then the Judge has to read everything and decide.
You've been watching a little less TV than the other guy, which is nice, but still too fucking much.