No, actually, if you're not sexist you don't care who made it, and you can just judge it based on the imagery.
And, news flash, whenever there is harmful Foo-ism running rampant there will be examples of Foos that are also anti-Foo, for various reasons. Only Fooists are going to point at that as if it changes the debate. It is not substantive in any way.
histery (n) A building in which artificial wombs or similar devices are made. Usage: I just ordered a new `pocket' from some random histery, I hope it isn't contaminated!
From the ancient Greek "hustera."
First use: 2018
Zee is Netherlands for the sea. I think you said something about a Dutch sex toy factory on solid ground not below sea level. If it was below sea level it would be Histeridam or something.
And generally breaking stuff is quicker and easier than creating it in the first place.
That's never once been my experience with QA. Breaking it always takes longer and is more expensive, because it only gets written in the first place one time, and it gets broken again and again and again and you'll never know if it is done breaking.
whereas a microkernel has defined communication channels and segregates blocks of code so they can only affect their own state and the state of information sent to them.
If that was actually true, GNU Hurd would be something useful that people work on, instead of something useless that was abandoned!
Sorry to reply twice, but I did want to add that I do at least agree Xenophon is the more accurate narrator, and the source I intended to allude to. It is in Xenophon's account of the trial that we learn that Socrates used his poverty as proof that he wasn't even a teacher. As for your other speculation, he was executed on the theory that his lack of debauchery indicated a lack of faith in the Gods, and corrupted the minds of the young, so it seems a bit of a stretch to think that among his proclivities. He was also ugly. Poor, ugly, executed for being a party-pooper. These are among the few facts not in dispute about him.
I even explained the level to which it was already formalized, and gave evidence that he didn't even support that much organization. Seems like a weak argument you're making.
Another slashdot scientisticist! Thanks for commenting. Surely your words refute any studies, or measurements. Surely the existence of an effect being below the threshold to be called important in some study is exactly the same as there being no effect at all possible at any level of precision. Thank you so much for your Authoritative bloviations grandpa!
If competitors do it, they can just sue them and get their lost profits restored. It isn't like they're short on lawyers. That said, the fastest they would be using is Q-band which is 6-9mm wavelength, and wouldn't even see most kites or balloons. With enough balloons you'd slow it down, but you'd also be blocking most of the city skyline and somebody might notice.
You'd need special materials, and now it's getting harder to maintain deniability.
A steam chimney isn't likely to be installed in the middle of the river, and I don't think steamboats are really a common thing anymore. Wall Street NY to New Jersey... check a map.
Even President W liked the umbrella idea. Definitely better than Cheney's moon mirrors.
But what happens when hackers get in and hold the planet hostage? What if Bruce Willis is too old to pass the pre-launch physical and can't save the planet?
Models don't "have errors." They model exactly what they're designed to model.
You don't sound like a person who understands what statistical models are even used for.
How could you possibly be a statistician when you can't even comprehend the metaphysics of a mathematical model? I'll give you a hint about them: They're not promises.
Conversion of energy from other forms into heat is not known to be reversible. See also: entropy
True that there is no natural law that would prevent it, but OTOH there is no known effect or technology that creates a net reduction in heat energy.
Literally any other physical effect that humans know how to manipulate is known to be reversible. So it seems reasonable that the methods just might not be understood. But we can't say clearly that it is.
Obviously, the planet will have additional climate cycles in the future, so it won't be hot forever, but that's not actually the same thing as reversing what happened already.
I dunno, whatabout the squirrels though? Do you have any idea WTF you're talking about? No. No you don't.
Why are you blathering about "supported by both state and federal government" blah blah fucking blah. Guess what, the government regulates accounting to a certain degree, but they don't mandate the use of particular accounting software. Do you think I'm supposed to stop using Apache ofbiz if I do consulting work? No, that would be idiotic, but anyways, you don't have any clue either way so you could reject the idea even without knowing it is wrong, just by knowing you don't know!
You do know that quickbooks is for small businesses, right? And that it doesn't include the features for larger businesses that ofbiz does? You literally can replace quickbooks with ofbiz, but you can't always replace ofbiz with quickbooks.
Just because you didn't hear about it on the teevee doesn't stop it from being real software. And WTF are you blathering about "network effect" for? Are you saying that ofbiz doesn't exist, because something else is the popular kid? What?
In the end you could have simply refrained from replying, you don't even know the general range of features the software provides.
Slashdot Mirror
No, actually, if you're not sexist you don't care who made it, and you can just judge it based on the imagery.
And, news flash, whenever there is harmful Foo-ism running rampant there will be examples of Foos that are also anti-Foo, for various reasons. Only Fooists are going to point at that as if it changes the debate. It is not substantive in any way.
histery (n) A building in which artificial wombs or similar devices are made.
Usage: I just ordered a new `pocket' from some random histery, I hope it isn't contaminated!
From the ancient Greek "hustera."
First use: 2018
Zee is Netherlands for the sea. I think you said something about a Dutch sex toy factory on solid ground not below sea level. If it was below sea level it would be Histeridam or something.
http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-...
First result for "dilbert bug bounty minivan"
Shit, I just realized all my unreleased vaporware is suddenly worth a fortune!
I've got thousands or millions of bugs that are non-exploitable, and as long as nobody releases the software, they'll stay that way!
I am not yet entertained.
And generally breaking stuff is quicker and easier than creating it in the first place.
That's never once been my experience with QA. Breaking it always takes longer and is more expensive, because it only gets written in the first place one time, and it gets broken again and again and again and you'll never know if it is done breaking.
whereas a microkernel has defined communication channels and segregates blocks of code so they can only affect their own state and the state of information sent to them.
If that was actually true, GNU Hurd would be something useful that people work on, instead of something useless that was abandoned!
when programmers already can’t write bug-free code, how the heck are they going to make up 100% guaranteed non-exploitable false bugs
Machine learning.
I'd put a /s, but no, I'm seriously predicting that they'll try this.
Werks is an obsolete spelling, not an error. Dumb-ass.
If your compiler doesn't remove that, you probably turned off optimizations.
Sorry to reply twice, but I did want to add that I do at least agree Xenophon is the more accurate narrator, and the source I intended to allude to. It is in Xenophon's account of the trial that we learn that Socrates used his poverty as proof that he wasn't even a teacher. As for your other speculation, he was executed on the theory that his lack of debauchery indicated a lack of faith in the Gods, and corrupted the minds of the young, so it seems a bit of a stretch to think that among his proclivities. He was also ugly. Poor, ugly, executed for being a party-pooper. These are among the few facts not in dispute about him.
I even explained the level to which it was already formalized, and gave evidence that he didn't even support that much organization. Seems like a weak argument you're making.
If those are your Gods, you should really watch an old show called Stargate. It's about ISPs.
I just want the Freedom to demand that assholes either shut the fuck up, or settle our dispute with a sword duel.
Another slashdot scientisticist! Thanks for commenting. Surely your words refute any studies, or measurements. Surely the existence of an effect being below the threshold to be called important in some study is exactly the same as there being no effect at all possible at any level of precision. Thank you so much for your Authoritative bloviations grandpa!
If competitors do it, they can just sue them and get their lost profits restored. It isn't like they're short on lawyers. That said, the fastest they would be using is Q-band which is 6-9mm wavelength, and wouldn't even see most kites or balloons. With enough balloons you'd slow it down, but you'd also be blocking most of the city skyline and somebody might notice.
You'd need special materials, and now it's getting harder to maintain deniability.
A steam chimney isn't likely to be installed in the middle of the river, and I don't think steamboats are really a common thing anymore. Wall Street NY to New Jersey... check a map.
No, not 10ms, 10us, one-thousandth of what you said.
I recommend spending more time considering units, and other facts.
Where did you get that idea?
The movie Office Space.
I wish I was kidding, but this is slashdot.
What next, reading fine print?! Where does the slippery slope to knowledge end?!
Even President W liked the umbrella idea. Definitely better than Cheney's moon mirrors.
But what happens when hackers get in and hold the planet hostage? What if Bruce Willis is too old to pass the pre-launch physical and can't save the planet?
It was a good movie, I dunno what people are so scared of.
But what happena when we run out of ice?
No more boat drinks, but we'll live on boats in the drink. Like Waterworld.
Models don't "have errors." They model exactly what they're designed to model.
You don't sound like a person who understands what statistical models are even used for.
How could you possibly be a statistician when you can't even comprehend the metaphysics of a mathematical model? I'll give you a hint about them: They're not promises.
Conversion of energy from other forms into heat is not known to be reversible. See also: entropy
True that there is no natural law that would prevent it, but OTOH there is no known effect or technology that creates a net reduction in heat energy.
Literally any other physical effect that humans know how to manipulate is known to be reversible. So it seems reasonable that the methods just might not be understood. But we can't say clearly that it is.
Obviously, the planet will have additional climate cycles in the future, so it won't be hot forever, but that's not actually the same thing as reversing what happened already.
I dunno, whatabout the squirrels though? Do you have any idea WTF you're talking about? No. No you don't.
Why are you blathering about "supported by both state and federal government" blah blah fucking blah. Guess what, the government regulates accounting to a certain degree, but they don't mandate the use of particular accounting software. Do you think I'm supposed to stop using Apache ofbiz if I do consulting work? No, that would be idiotic, but anyways, you don't have any clue either way so you could reject the idea even without knowing it is wrong, just by knowing you don't know!
You do know that quickbooks is for small businesses, right? And that it doesn't include the features for larger businesses that ofbiz does? You literally can replace quickbooks with ofbiz, but you can't always replace ofbiz with quickbooks.
Just because you didn't hear about it on the teevee doesn't stop it from being real software. And WTF are you blathering about "network effect" for? Are you saying that ofbiz doesn't exist, because something else is the popular kid? What?
In the end you could have simply refrained from replying, you don't even know the general range of features the software provides.