Slashdot Mirror


User: antaresv

antaresv's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Bad Credit? on Newest Job Qualification — A Good Credit History · · Score: 1

    I have a low credit score, why? Because I never buy anything with credit, ever. House is paid for, and I buy cars (and everything else) that I can afford now. No credit, ever! That is why it should, if not already, be illegal. I am being discriminated against because I refuse to take part in a corrupt system.

  2. Re:Effect on other cases? on ACLU, EFF, & Others Fight RIAA for Debbie Foster · · Score: 1

    I have lived in the United States all my life and have payed close attention recently to our legal system. And I still am not entirely sure how our legal system works (besides getting paid). "Would be fantastic to see them crushed down.....!" Yes it would.

  3. Re:the actual response... on Microsoft Workers Prefer Google · · Score: 1

    You have way too much time on your hands

  4. Re:Data Warehouse on U.S. Gov't Spent $30M On Citizens' Personal Info · · Score: 1

    "FBI lawyers rationalized that even though data brokers may have obtained financial information, agents could still use the information because brokers were not acting as a consumer-reporting agency but rather as a data warehouse." The FBI now has their own lawyers? What is our previously great country coming to?

  5. Re:Bad analogy on Small Cable Groups Seek To Break Net Neutrality · · Score: 1

    'Why don't they go and tell the oil companies what they should charge for their damn gas?'" To me the worst part is that, in most areas, these ISP's are "natural monopolies". Being a monopoly, natural or not, completely changes the rules. As bad as the oil companies seem, they are not (as far as I know) going back to the automotive companies and demanding a tariff for allowing the cars to use gasoline. This would be considered "double dipping" at best and extortion as worst case. And the oil companies are considered to be operating in a competitive market. But the communication companies operating in a monopoly environment want to given this special consideration. Consideration not given to a free, open market. Consideration that they themselves wouldn't give to anyone who wants to compete with them (smaller ISP's, communities, etc.)