My data just happened to be on that hard drive, so I am a little upset about it to say the least. We in the armed forces have been told that the individual was definitely NOT supposed to take that data home. It even says so on the VA website reguarding this incident. http://www.firstgov.gov/veteransinfo.shtml If he had written authorization to do so, then that is a completely different story, and all of us that were affected should be even more angry. There are procedures in place for bringing ANY government property home; whether it be DATA or PHYSICAL media. Especially privacy act information.
So which is it? He was or he wasn't allowed to? It is a bit too convenient for my taste that the laptop was recovered so magically and with the data intact.
This kind of back-and-forth "truth" on these kinds of issues gets very old very fast.
So basically all the site would have to do is charge individuals signing up for accounts a one time payment of $.01 . That way the individual has given up something, and the site is giving them the membership. Then have a contract like a EULA, and a button to click "I agree" to the terms of not being a DirecTV employee or whatever else.
Would that qualify as significant protecton?
Slashdot Mirror
My data just happened to be on that hard drive, so I am a little upset about it to say the least. We in the armed forces have been told that the individual was definitely NOT supposed to take that data home. It even says so on the VA website reguarding this incident. http://www.firstgov.gov/veteransinfo.shtml If he had written authorization to do so, then that is a completely different story, and all of us that were affected should be even more angry. There are procedures in place for bringing ANY government property home; whether it be DATA or PHYSICAL media. Especially privacy act information.
So which is it? He was or he wasn't allowed to? It is a bit too convenient for my taste that the laptop was recovered so magically and with the data intact.
This kind of back-and-forth "truth" on these kinds of issues gets very old very fast.
Smells fishy...
So basically all the site would have to do is charge individuals signing up for accounts a one time payment of $.01 . That way the individual has given up something, and the site is giving them the membership. Then have a contract like a EULA, and a button to click "I agree" to the terms of not being a DirecTV employee or whatever else. Would that qualify as significant protecton?