How does knowledge in a different domain than you prefer invalidate the potential benefits of better understanding the combustion dynamics within jet engines.
From the article:
"In order to make alternative jet fuel sources feasible, they need to be compatible with petroleum and produce similar combustion performance," Dryer said. "This will only be possible if we fully understand how both petroleum and alternative fuels burn and design engines based on this fundamental knowledge."
Furthermore until an alternative method of travel for large distances with a similar time transit is widely available, Jets remain a reality we must deal with.
I am not stating nothing new, plenty of previous post, state a similar comment, therefore as plainly as possible, the ruckus is that BBC content is in part funded for, via taxes, therefore their, UK citizens, complain is that the BBC's implementation poses an implied double tax to UK viewers; due to limited OS and Media Player availability.
With all good intentions there is an implied test of due diligence that your implementation will be equitable to all; problem is that is rarely possible.
Interesting proposal; specially as it could be further developed into an alternative open source competitor to Alexa and other such like services.
Along the lines to of your concern:
users aren't generate automatically
I wonder will any service be able to ensure that a person actually and intentionally viewed a site/page they wanted. Since beyond technical issues at the core, this is more a matter of a persons morals and standards than anything else.
for example: ( might be urban myth ) I was told of a family that had a Nielsen ratings box, that would often turn the TV to a show and go out for dinner. Since they were expected to maintain a certain number of hours TV viewing and after a while... they just did not care, but wanted to remain in the program.
Who cares what Linus has to say?
The value of his statement is not based on wether you agree or disagree with it; and his relevance is that his statements are often a good launch point for a dialog.
Slashdot Mirror
Use an IP Anonymizer as well as a common login from say something like bugmenot. Then your habits will be lost in the noise.
How does knowledge in a different domain than you prefer invalidate the potential benefits of better understanding the combustion dynamics within jet engines.
From the article: "In order to make alternative jet fuel sources feasible, they need to be compatible with petroleum and produce similar combustion performance," Dryer said. "This will only be possible if we fully understand how both petroleum and alternative fuels burn and design engines based on this fundamental knowledge."
Furthermore until an alternative method of travel for large distances with a similar time transit is widely available, Jets remain a reality we must deal with.
Easy on the hate....
I am not stating nothing new, plenty of previous post, state a similar comment, therefore as plainly as possible, the ruckus is that BBC content is in part funded for, via taxes, therefore their, UK citizens, complain is that the BBC's implementation poses an implied double tax to UK viewers; due to limited OS and Media Player availability.
With all good intentions there is an implied test of due diligence that your implementation will be equitable to all; problem is that is rarely possible.
Then the question begs to be asked:
When will Amazon consider the downloading of any and all music titles as released illegal?
Along the lines to of your concern
I wonder will any service be able to ensure that a person actually and intentionally viewed a site/page they wanted. Since beyond technical issues at the core, this is more a matter of a persons morals and standards than anything else.
for example: ( might be urban myth ) I was told of a family that had a Nielsen ratings box, that would often turn the TV to a show and go out for dinner. Since they were expected to maintain a certain number of hours TV viewing and after a while... they just did not care, but wanted to remain in the program.
The value of his statement is not based on wether you agree or disagree with it; and his relevance is that his statements are often a good launch point for a dialog.