i agree with you on your other points, but i don't see why wikipedia shouldn't aim to be just as credible as... the encyclopedia brittanica (which seems to be the example to use) or any other book. if i can't trust the information on the website i'm going to, why am i going there at all?
Slashdot Mirror
i agree with you on your other points, but i don't see why wikipedia shouldn't aim to be just as credible as... the encyclopedia brittanica (which seems to be the example to use) or any other book. if i can't trust the information on the website i'm going to, why am i going there at all?