There is a qualitative difference between "climate change experts", who would presumably use scientific methodolgy and your "bunch of experts on religion", who might or might not. It depends whether they were actual experts, in which care they probably wouldn't reach any agreement pertaining to the existence of God. They would more likely debate various religious philosophies, the historicity of the bible, etc.
It is a fallacy to equate religious "belief" which is based on... what, some type of raw emotive signals that you picked up under duress at age 6 or 7? with scientific understanding, based on hypotheses strengthening into theories when millions of facts support it and none fail to.
Slashdot Mirror
There is a qualitative difference between "climate change experts", who would presumably use scientific methodolgy and your "bunch of experts on religion", who might or might not. It depends whether they were actual experts, in which care they probably wouldn't reach any agreement pertaining to the existence of God. They would more likely debate various religious philosophies, the historicity of the bible, etc. ... what, some type of raw emotive signals that you picked up under duress at age 6 or 7? with scientific understanding, based on hypotheses strengthening into theories when millions of facts support it and none fail to.
It is a fallacy to equate religious "belief" which is based on