That's not the extent of the issue. Exposing the methods used by **AA to gather this "evidence" is equally important, and the legality of these methods deserves some scrutiny.
I'm not sure there would be any real benefit to such a plan. Why would they want to know what you may be more likely to order? Shit food is shit food, no matter what color box you put it in.
I seem to remember slashback being a digest of previous popular stories from previous weeks. Slashing back to something that's still under the "Yesterday's News" link is a little moronic.
Most of the recent slashbacks have some negative comments about the/backs themselves... hopefully the editors are paying attention: your readers don't want or need it.
Slashdot Mirror
between the clogged tubes and the friggin SNAKES... on a PLANE! I'm not sure what to do...
Google Desktop and crap-ware ridden screensavers have nothing to do with one another. Summary is a google-bashing troll, at best.
That's not the extent of the issue. Exposing the methods used by **AA to gather this "evidence" is equally important, and the legality of these methods deserves some scrutiny.
Makes sense, but I'd guess one would have to go to McDonalds first...
I'm not sure there would be any real benefit to such a plan. Why would they want to know what you may be more likely to order? Shit food is shit food, no matter what color box you put it in.
I seem to remember slashback being a digest of previous popular stories from previous weeks. Slashing back to something that's still under the "Yesterday's News" link is a little moronic.
/backs themselves... hopefully the editors are paying attention: your readers don't want or need it.
Most of the recent slashbacks have some negative comments about the