You dont have the right to be provided with absolute guaranteed security. And thats what americans are asking for now, or being fooled and goaded into it, by their govt so that it might slip the noose around the populace ever tighter and just point at the 'terrorism' issue and shrug. "We're doing it for you! its what you asked for!" Considering the number of Soccer Moms blown up recently in middle america by terrorists, its obviously working! GO Bush!
Its important to have control of the population and give the tools of authorit(y|arianism) to the police, cuz when the resource crunch/environmental disaster comes (or intensifies..), it's going to be hard for the stakeholders to maintain their lifestyles without a very strong arm of physical and legal force subject to their whims.
-math
ASBOs would be fine, the issue is the lack of public body oversight into them. If they want a lower-power and higher-volume court thats not necessary a full criminal tribunal system (costs, delays, complexity, etc), then *FORM ONE* an execute its mandate based on those criteria. I see no reason why there should not be a public non-governmental body not involved in making the decisions here.
(I can guess why - if it was a public body responsible for the results, politicians couldnt claim to be getting 'tough on crime' cuz they'd have no direct control over the body.)
The elite are just shoring up power for when the resource/environmental crunch comes... history bears this out.
Slashdot Mirror
You dont have the right to be provided with absolute guaranteed security. And thats what americans are asking for now, or being fooled and goaded into it, by their govt so that it might slip the noose around the populace ever tighter and just point at the 'terrorism' issue and shrug. "We're doing it for you! its what you asked for!" Considering the number of Soccer Moms blown up recently in middle america by terrorists, its obviously working! GO Bush! Its important to have control of the population and give the tools of authorit(y|arianism) to the police, cuz when the resource crunch/environmental disaster comes (or intensifies..), it's going to be hard for the stakeholders to maintain their lifestyles without a very strong arm of physical and legal force subject to their whims. -math
ASBOs would be fine, the issue is the lack of public body oversight into them. If they want a lower-power and higher-volume court thats not necessary a full criminal tribunal system (costs, delays, complexity, etc), then *FORM ONE* an execute its mandate based on those criteria. I see no reason why there should not be a public non-governmental body not involved in making the decisions here.
(I can guess why - if it was a public body responsible for the results, politicians couldnt claim to be getting 'tough on crime' cuz they'd have no direct control over the body.)
The elite are just shoring up power for when the resource/environmental crunch comes... history bears this out.
-math