ive noticed they seem to say that win-nt4 server is significantly better than linux, but they never seemed to mention the fact that win-nt couldnt handle the load of hotmail.com, causing win-nt to crash several times before solaris was restored as the server os for the hotmail mail service. they probably also didnt mention that redhat.com handles 30,000+ emails a day on a 486sx running redhat 5.2 "i think" without any problems. id say there was alot left out of that report and was merely a poor guided stab at linux.
Slashdot Mirror
ive noticed they seem to say that win-nt4 server is significantly better than linux, but they never seemed to mention the fact that win-nt couldnt handle the load of hotmail.com, causing win-nt to crash several times before solaris was restored as the server os for the hotmail mail service. they probably also didnt mention that redhat.com handles 30,000+ emails a day on a 486sx running redhat 5.2 "i think" without any problems. id say there was alot left out of that report and was merely a poor guided stab at linux.