But but Point 1 is making the same argument as point 2 and Point 4 is simply what happens _after_ point 3, or simply the cause of point 3 - not seperate factor In effect, you document 2 factors: the IBM name was useful in selling the things, and the machine had a large number of component suppliers due to full documentation of the hardware.
Slashdot Mirror
But but
Point 1 is making the same argument as point 2
and
Point 4 is simply what happens _after_ point 3, or simply the cause of point 3 - not seperate factor
In effect, you document 2 factors: the IBM name was useful in selling the things, and the machine had a large number of component suppliers due to full documentation of the hardware.
If so, their service would _suck_.