I can see some originality in the UI now, the theme is quite good. But I still think it needs a lot of work (things look very sparsely placed sometimes) Bluecurve was brilliant in that respect.
Only, I think the taskbar on top is something copied.
I am a little biased towards the OSS and Linux, but this time, its competition with one of the best software MS has got.
- OO mainly has disadv of being a little heavy (because of all the features (which is good)); - MSO is a bit lightweight and thus more handy - MSO is more stable as compared to OO
One could work very well even without MSO (its just a matter of personal preference)
-> Better support for hardware, its better from where I have seen, but it could get even better
-> User interface, The current user interfaces heavily imitate existing ones. There should be more originality in the user interface, some innovative designs of doing simple things. Also things like GNOME / KDE do not give a sense of a complete package, there is little something missing here and there. But we are getting there... Konqueror is a very good 'explorer', still there is no such thing as the simple 'Windows explorer'
-> Better package managers, even more abstracted installers as simple as double-click install
-> More Stability, I think thats the only reason why people opt for Unix
All said and done, kudos to all the linux devs for putting Linux as a viable alternative in the OS soup.
Slashdot Mirror
its something like erm ...
Web 3.0 technology suggests:
well yes! thats the word I am looking for
I can see some originality in the UI now, the theme is quite good. But I still think it needs a lot of work (things look very sparsely placed sometimes) Bluecurve was brilliant in that respect.
Only, I think the taskbar on top is something copied.
I am not a ST fan, but yep thats what most of the inventors admitted.
Imagining that such a high speed is achievable,
don't you think, there needs to be a look-ahead and clearer which would clear space debris.
For TV
Digital (unless HD) Analog
It starts with the hardware, .JET
who knows probably a few weeks later we might see a new prog. paradigm
after some days ...
.. okay,
Okay
you can block my advert. but please atleast accept my cookie
I am a little biased towards the OSS and Linux, but this time,
its competition with one of the best software MS has got.
- OO mainly has disadv of being a little heavy (because of all the features (which is good));
- MSO is a bit lightweight and thus more handy
- MSO is more stable as compared to OO
One could work very well even without MSO (its just a matter of personal preference)
-> Better support for hardware, its better from where I have seen, but it could get even better
...
-> User interface, The current user interfaces heavily imitate existing ones. There should be more originality in the user interface, some innovative designs of doing simple things.
Also things like GNOME / KDE do not give a sense of a complete package, there is little something missing here and there. But we are getting there
Konqueror is a very good 'explorer', still there is no such thing as the simple 'Windows explorer'
-> Better package managers, even more abstracted installers as simple as double-click install
-> More Stability, I think thats the only reason why people opt for Unix
All said and done, kudos to all the linux devs for putting Linux as a viable alternative in the OS soup.
Its nice to see some competition, that raises the level of the product